Few domestic violence offenders are prosecuted for their crimes, but it is not known which offenders are most likely to receive this most serious treatment. This study examines the nature of prosecution within a state that employs a mandatory arrest policy. A population of 448 cases of intimate family violence was examined using court and police records. Only 14 percent of the offenders were found to have been prosecuted and convicted. The legal characteristics of the crime and the offender most clearly distinguished prosecuted cases from cases that were dismissed or nolle prosequi. Social factors, such as the age and relationship of the defendant, however, may have influenced the decision not to prosecute. Variations in the treatment across courts and dual arrest are implementation problems of this new policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, K.
, & Cutshall, C. R. (1987). Refusing to prosecute minor offenses: The relative influence of legal and extralegal factors. Justice Quarterly, 4, 595-607.
2.
Albonetti, C. A.
(1986). Criminality, prosecutorial screening, and uncertainty: Toward a theory of discretionary decision making in felony case processings. Criminology, 24, 623-643.
3.
Albonetti, C. A.
(1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty. Law and Society Review, 21, 291-313.
4.
Buzawa, E. S.
, & Buzawa, C. G. (1990). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Daly, K.
(1987). Structure and practice of a familial-based justice in a criminal court. Law and Society Review, 21, 267-290.
6.
Dunford, F. W.
, Huizinga, D., & Elliott, D. S. (1990). The role of arrest in domestic assault: The Omaha police experiment. Criminology, 28, 183-206.
7.
Edwards, S. S. M.
(1989). Policing "domestic" violence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
Ellis, J. W.
(1984). Prosecutorial discretion to charge in cases of spousal assault: A dialogue. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 75, 56-102.
9.
Feeney, F.
, Dill, F., & Weir, A. (1983). Arrests without conviction-How often they occur and why. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
10.
Ford, D. A.
(1983). Wife battery and criminal justice: A study of victim decision-making. Family Relations, 32, 463-475.
11.
Forst, B.
, & Brosi, K. B. (1977). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the prosecutor. Journal of Legal Studies, 6, 177-191.
12.
Gottfredson, M. R.
, & Gottfredson, D. M. (1988). Decision making in criminal justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
13.
Hernon, J.
, & Forst, B. (1984). The criminal justice response to victim harm. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
14.
Hirschel, J. D.
, Hutchinson, I. W., & Dean, C. W. (1992). The failure to deter spouse abuse. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 7-23.
15.
Jacoby, J. E.
(1982a). Basic issues in prosecution and public defender performance. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
16.
Jacoby, J. E.
(1982b). Prosecutorial decision making: A national study. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
17.
Lear, E. T.
(1993, June). Is conviction irrelevant?UCLA Law Review, 40, 1179-1228.
18.
MacKenzie, D. L.
(1994). Drug policy initiatives: The next 25 years. In D. L. MacKenzie & C. D. Uchida (Eds.), Drugs and crime (pp. 283-290). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
McLeod, M.
(1983). Victim noncooperation in the prosecution of domestic assaultCriminology, 21, 395-416.
20.
Miethe, T. D.
(1987). Stereotypical conceptions and criminal processing: The case of the victim-offender relationship. Justice Quarterly, 4, 571-593.
21.
Moulds, E. F.
(1980). Chivalry and paternalism: Disparities of treatment in the criminal justice system. In S. K. Datesman & F. R. Scarparitti (Eds.), Women, crime andjustice (pp. 277-299). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
Myers, M. A.
, & Hagan, J. (1979). Private and public trouble: Prosecutors and the allocation of court resources. Social Problems, 26, 439-451.
23.
Quarm, D.
, & Schwartz, M. D. (1983). Legal reform and the criminal court: The case of domestic violence. Northern Kentucky Law Review, 10, 199-225.
24.
Rauma, D.
(1984). Going for the gold: Prosecutorial decision making in cases of wife assault. Social Science Research, 13, 321-351.
25.
Sarri, R. C.
(1986). Gender and race differences in criminal justice processing. Women's Studies International Forum, 9, 89-99.
26.
Schmidt, J.
, & Steury, E. H. (1989). Prosecutorial discretion in filing charges in domestic violence cases. Criminology, 27, 487-510.
27.
Shapiro, D. I.
(1991). Sentencing the reformed addict: Deparure under the federal sentencing guidelines. Columbia Law Review, 91, 2051-2073.
28.
Sherman, L.
(1992). Policing domestic violence. New York, NY: Free Press.
29.
Sherman, L.
, & Berk, R. A. (1984, April). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
30.
Spohn, C.
, Gruhl, J., & Welch, S. (1981-1982). The effect of race on sentencing: A reexamination of an unsettled question. Law and Society Review, 16, 71-88.
31.
Thomson, R. J.
, & Zingraff, M. T. (1981). Detecting sentencing disparity: Some problems and evidence. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 869-880.
32.
Vera Institute of Justice
. (1977). Felony arrests: Their prosecution and disposition in New York City's courts. New York, NY: Author.
33.
Zora, J.
(1992). The criminal law of misdemeanor domestic violence, 1970-1990. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 46-72.
