In order to establish whether a relationship exists between deterrence and moral reasoning, respondents were administered a questionnaire containing a list of possible factors that could account for deterrence, along with a questionnaire measuring their level of moral reasoning within the conceptual framework developed by Kohlberg. Analyses revealed differences between subgroups at various stages of moral development. Results are discussed in terms of research and policy implications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akers, R.
, Krohn, M., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44, 636-655.
2.
Andenaes, J.
(1974). Punishment and deterrence. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
3.
Anderson, L.
, Chiricos, T., & Waldo, G. (1977). Formal and informal sanctions: A comparison of deterrent effects. Social Problems, 25, 103-114.
4.
Bailey, W.
, & Lott, R. (1976). Crime, punishment and personality: An examination of the deterrence question. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 67, 99-110.
5.
Blasi, A.
(1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 1-45.
6.
Campbell, D.
, & Ross, L. (1968). The Connecticut crackdown on speeding: Time-series data in quasi-experimental analysis. Law & Society Review, 3, 33-35.
7.
DeLorto, T.
, & Cullen, F. (1985). The impact of moral development on delinquent involvement. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 9, 129-139.
8.
Erickson, M.
, & Gibbs, J. (1978). Objective and perceptual properties of legal punishment and the deterrence doctrine. Social Problems, 25, 253-264.
9.
Etzioni, A.
(1988). The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. New York, NY: The Free Press.
10.
Gibbs, J.
(1968). Crime, punishment and deterrence. Social Science Quarterly, 49, 157-162.
11.
Glass, G.
(1968). Analysis of data on the Connecticut speeding crackdown as a time-series quasi-experiment. Law & Society Review, 3, 55-76.
12.
Grasmick, H.
, & Green, D. (1980). Legal punishment, social disapproval and internalization as inhibitors of criminal behavior. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 71, 325-335.
13.
Hays, W.
(1988). Statistics. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
14.
Jacob, H.
(1980). Deterrent effects of formal and informal sanctions. Law and Policy Quarterly, 2, 61-70.
15.
Jennings, W.
, Kilkenny, R., & Kohlberg, L. (1983). Moral development theory and practice for youthful and adult offenders. In W. Laufer & J. Day (Eds.), Personality theory, moral development and criminal behavior (pp. 281-355). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
16.
Jensen, G.
, Erickson, M., & Gibbs, J. (1978). Perceived risk of punishment and self-reported delinquency. Social Forces, 57, 57-58.
17.
Johnson, R.
(1979). Juvenile delinquency and its origins. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Kohlberg, L.
(1964). Development of moral character and ideology. In M. L. Hoffman (Ed.), Review of child development research (pp. 383-432). New York, NY: Rand McNally.
19.
Kohlberg, L.
(1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive developmental approach. In T. Lichona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues (pp. 31-53). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
20.
Kurtines, W.
, & Gewirtz, J. (1984). Morality, moral behavior and moral development. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
21.
Landes, W.
(1978). An economic study of U.S. aircraft hijacking, 1961-1976. Journal of Law and Economics, 21, 1-32.
22.
Meier, R.
, & Johnson, W. (1977). Deterrence as social control: The legal and extralegal production of conformity. American Sociological Review, 42, 292-304.
23.
Minor, W.
(1977). A deterrence-control theory of crime. In R. Meier (Ed.), Theory in criminology (pp. 117-137). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
Parker, R.
, & Grasmick, H. (1979). Linking actual and perceived certainty of punishment: An exploratory study of an untested proposition in deterrence theory. Criminology, 17, 366-379.
25.
Parsons, T.
(1951). The social system. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
26.
Paternoster, R.
(1983). Perceived risk and social control: Do sanctions really deter?Law & Society Review, 17, 457-479.
27.
Paternoster, R.
(1987). The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues. Justice Quarterly, 4, 173-217.
28.
Paternoster, R.
(1989). Decisions to participate in and desist from four types of common delinquents: Deterrence and the rational choice perspective. Law & Society Review, 23, 7-40.
29.
Paternoster, R.
, & lovanni, L. (1986). The deterrent effect of perceived severity: A reexamination. Social Forces, 64, 751-777.
30.
Paternoster, R.
, Saltzman, L., Chiricos, T., & Waldo, G. (1983). Estimating perceptual stability and deterrent effects: The role of perceived legal punishments in the inhibition of criminal involvement. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 74, 270-297.
31.
Rich, J.
, & Devites, M. (1985). Theories of moral development. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
32.
Ross, H.
(1977). Deterrence regained: The Cheshire constabulary's breathalyzer blitz. Journal of Legal Studies, 6, 241-292.
33.
Silberman, M.
(1976). Toward a theory of criminal deterrence. American Sociological Review, 41, 442-461.
34.
Tittle, C.
(1980). Sanctions and social deviance. New York, NY: Praeger.
35.
Veneziano, C.
, & Veneziano, L. (1988). Correlates of moral development in juvenile delinquents. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 12, 97-116.
36.
Williams, K.
, & Hawkins, R. (1986). Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical overview. Law & Society Review, 20, 545-572.
37.
Zedlewski, E.
(1983). Deterrence findings and data sources: A comparison of the Uniform Crime Reports and the National Crime Surveys. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 20, 262-276.
