Grass-roots victims' rights organizations have had substantial success in recent years regarding legislative changes supportive of victim issues. The movement, however, has avoided empirical scrutiny, perhaps due to the diverse nature of local groups. This paper compares data collected from one of these organizations in a Southern state with a sample of non-activist victims. Demographic and attitudinal data reveal significant differences between activist and nonactivist victims. The analysis suggests that, due to such differences, the victims' rights movement may not adequately represent the needs or desires of all victims. Instead, depending upon the demographic composition of local victims groups, the focus of advocated legislative change may vary significantly.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Biderman, A. D.
, Johnson, L., McIntyre, J., & Wier, A. (1967). Report on a pilot study in the District of Columbia on victimization and attitudes toward law enforcement (Field Surveys I). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
2.
Bureau of Justice Statistics
. (1986). Criminal victimization: 1985. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
3.
Carrington, F.
, & Nicholson, G. (1984). The victims' movement: An idea whose time has come. Pepperdine Law Review, 11, 1-14.
4.
Ennis, P. H.
(1967). Criminal behavior in the United States: A report of a national survey (Field Surveys II). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
5.
Finn, P.
, & Lee, B. N. W. (1987). Serving crime victims and witnesses. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
6.
Flanagan, T. J.
, & Jamieson, K. M. (Eds.) (1988). Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics-1987. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
7.
Forst, B.
, & Hernon, J. (1985). The criminal justice response to victim harm. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
8.
Gamson, W. A.
(1975). The strategy of social protest. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
9.
Hagan, J.
(1982). Victims before the law: A study of victim involvement in the criminal justice process. Journal of Criminal Justice, 73(1), 317-330.
10.
Hagan, J.
(1983). Victims before the law: The organizational domination of criminal law. Toronto: Butterworths.
11.
Hudson, P. S.
(1984). The crime victim and the criminal justice system: Time for a change. Pepperdine Law Review, 11, 23-62.
12.
Jeffries, C. R.
(1972). The historical development of criminology. In H. Mannheim (Ed.), Pioneers in criminology (2nd ed.) (pp. 458-498). Montclair, NJ: Patterson-Smith.
13.
Kahn, A.
(1984). Victims of crime and violence: Final report of the APA task force on the victims of crime and violence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
Karmen, A.
(1984). Crime victims: An introduction to victimology. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
15.
Knudten, M.
, & Knudten, R. (1981). What happens to crime victims and witnesses in the justice system? In B. Galaway and J. Hudson (Eds.), Perspectives on crime victims (pp. 52-61). St. Louis: Mosby.
16.
Knudten, R. D.
, Mead, A., Knudten, M., & Doerner, W. (1976). The victim in the administration of criminal justice: Problems and implications. In W. McDonald (Ed.), Criminal justice and the victim (pp. 115-146). Beverly Hills: Sage.
17.
Lofland, J.
(1985). Protest: Studies of collective behavior and social movements. New Brunswick: Transaction.
18.
McGillis, D.
(1986). Crime victim restitution: An analysis of approaches. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
19.
McGillis, D.
, & Smith, P. (1983). Compensating victims of crime: An analysis of American programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
20.
National Research Council
(1978). Deterrence and incapacitation: Estimating the effects of criminal sanctions on the crime rate. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
21.
President's Task Force on Victims of Crime
(1982). President's Task Force on Victims of Crime: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
22.
Radelet, L.
(1986). The police and the community (4th ed.). New York: MacMillan.
23.
Reilly, J.
(1981, October). Victim/witness services in prosecutors' offices. Prosecutor, 8-11.
24.
Reiss, A. J.
(1967). Studies in crime and law enforcement in major metropolitan areas (Field Surveys III). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25.
Schafer, S.
(1968). The victim and his criminal. New York: Random House.
26.
Smith, B. L.
(1985). Trends in the victims' rights movement and implications for future research. Victimology: An International Journal, 10(1-4), 34-43.
27.
Symonds, M.
(1980). The second injury to victims. Evaluation and Change, 7(1), 36-38.
28.
U.S. Department of Justice
. (1980). Restitution to victims of personal and household crimes. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
29.
U.S. Department of Justice
. (1983). Victim and witness assistance: New state laws and the system's response. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30.
U.S. Department of Justice
. (1986). Four years later: A report on the President's Task Force on Victims of Crime. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
31.
Viano, E.
(1987). Victim's rights and the Constitution: Reflections on a bicentennial. Crime and Delinquency, 33(4), 438-451.
32.
Vold, G.
, & Bernard, T. (1986). Theoretical criminology (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford.
33.
von Hentig, H.
(1948). The criminal and his victim. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
34.
Wilson, J.
(1973). Introduction to social movements. New York: Basic Books.
35.
Wolfgang, M.
(1958). Patterns in criminal homicide. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
36.
Zald, M.
, & Ash, R. (1966). Social Movement Organizations: Growth, Decay, and Change. Social Forces, 44, 327-340.
