Case studies have long been utilized in a variety of disciplines for educational and training purposes enhanc ing the student learning process. The experiential case study model presents a problem solving approach to a criminal justice oriented situation with no precise, clear-cut solutions. The utility of this model allows the student to apply theoretical concepts and principles to practical situations. An evaluation of the model was made in a quasi-experimental research design with two groups of criminal justice students. The results supported the experi ential approach over a traditional teaching method.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bard, M.
& Zacker, J. (November, 1976). How police handle explosive squabbles. Psychology Today (pp. 27-29).
2.
Braswell, M.
(1978). The role of criminal justice education in meeting prac titioner needs. Southern Journal of Criminal Justice, 3, 42-45.
3.
Braswell, M.
& Brown, S. (1981). Teaching the behavioral arts and sciences to law enforcement students. Journal of Police Science and Administra tion, 9, 19-23.
4.
Braswell, M.
& Meeks, R. (1982). The police officer as a marriage and fam ily therapist: A discussion of some issues. Family Therapy, 9, 12-19.
5.
Braswell, M.
& Miller, L. (1986). Case studies in criminal justice education: An experiential model. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 10, 15-24.
6.
Breslin, W.
(1978). Police intervention in domestic confrontations. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 6, 13-21.
7.
Brown, S.
(1982). Research methods and criminal justice curricula: Sur mounting the obstacles. Criminal Justice Review, 7(1), 11-16.
8.
Crawford, O.
(1977). Cases and materials: Evidence for police. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
9.
Esbensen, F.
(1985). Liberal arts in criminal justice: The students' perspec tive. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 10, 117-126.
10.
Goldstein, A.
(1977). Police crisis intervention. Kalamazoo, MI: Behaviordelia.
11.
Green, E.
(1976). Psychology for law enforcement. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
12.
Miller, L.
& Braswell, M. (1983). Human relations and police work. Pros pect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
13.
Miller, L.
& Braswell, M. (1985). Teaching police ehtics: An experiential model. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 10, 41-54.
14.
Milligan, J.
(1978). Attitude changes among police. In W. Taylor and M. Braswell (Eds.) Issues in police and criminal psychology. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
15.
Mills, R.
(1980). Offender assessment: A casebook in corrections. Cincin nati: Anderson Publishing.
16.
Moore, R.
(1979). Proceedings of the National Symposium on Higher Edu cation for Police Officers. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
17.
Nettler, G.
(1982). Explaining the criminal (Vol. 1). Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing.
18.
Parker, L.
& Meier, R. (1975). Interpersonal psychology for law enforce ment and corrections. St. Paul: West Publishing.
19.
Russell, M.
& Beigel, A. (1976). Understanding human behavior for effec tive law enforcement. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Sherman, L.
(1979). The quality of police education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
21.
Taylor, M.
(1978). A computer simulation of innovative decision making in organizations. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
22.
Ward, R.
& Webb, V. (1984). Quest for quality. New York: University Publications.
