Perceived Effectiveness of the Chicago Crime Commission,1980-1985: Insiders and Outsiders

Abstract

Privatization is one of the most significant issues in criminal justice. Previous studies have concentrated on greater private involvement in corrections and policing, but have ignored citizens' crime commissions as a form of private sector participation in the justice system. This study examines the perceived effectiveness of the oldest and most famous citizens' crime commission in the United States-the Chicago Crime Commission. The Commission's effectiveness is measured, using data obtained through focused interviews with the top criminal justice authorities in the Chicago criminal justice system and in the Illinois legislature. Overall, the Commission was given high ratings on the criteria utilized to measure effectiveness. A high degree of similarity was discovered in the ratings of decisionmakers in city and county criminal justice agencies. Ratings by state legislators were much lower than those of decisionmakers from Chicago and Cook County. Differences in perceptions of the Commission's legiti macy account for some of the variation in the perceptions of effectiveness. Many city and county authorities re garded the Commission as part of the informal, unofficial criminal justice system in Chicago. By contrast, most of the legislators perceived the Commission as operating outside both the local justice system and the legislative system. One of the important substantive issues raised by this study is the distinction between realistic change and fundamental change in the criminal justice system.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bickel, C. (1962). The least dangerous branch. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Black, C. (1960). The people and the court. New York: Macmillan.

Cameron, K.S. & Whetten, D.A. (Eds.). (1983). Organizational effective ness: A comparison of multiple models. New York: Academic Press.

Camp, C.G. & Camp, G.M. (1984). Private sector involvement in prison services operations. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.

Chicago Crime Commission . (1984). Annual report. Chicago: Author.

Chicago Crime Commission . (1982). How to organize a citizen's crime com mission. Chicago: Author.

Goldberg, W.A. (1940). The Chicago Crime Commission. Unpublished doc toral dissertation, Northwestern University.

Haller, M. (1971). Civic reformers and police leadership: Chicago, 1905 1935. In H. Hahn (Ed.), Police in urban society (pp. 39-56). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Haller, M. (1970). Urban crime and criminal justice: The Chicago case, Journal of American History, 57, 619-635.

10.

Healy, P.F. (1985). Personal interview. Crime Commission Office in Chi cago, June 24.

11.

Hoffman, D.E. (1986). Tilting at windmills: The Chicago Crime Commission vs. organized crime, 1980-1984. In T. Bynum (Ed.). Organized crime in America: Concepts and controversy. In press.

12.

Jacob, H. (1980). Crime and justice in urban America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

13.

Kouzes, J.M. & Mico, P.R. (1979). Domain theory: An introduction to orga nizational behavior in human service organizations. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 15, 449-469.

14.

Merton, R.K. (1972). Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. In C.A. Anderson (Ed.), Variety of political expression in so ciology (pp. 9-47). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

15.

Morse, W.L. & Moley, R.C. (1929). Crime commissions as aids in the legal social field. American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 145, 68-73.

16.

Mullen, J. , Chabotar, K. , & Carrow, D. (1984). The privitazion of correc tions. Washington, DC: ABT Associates.

17.

Patrick, M. (1968). The Supreme Court and authority acceptance. Western Political Quarterly, 31, 5-19.

18.

Peterson, V.W. (1945). Crime commissions in the United States. Chicago: Chicago Crime Commission.

19.

Price, J.L. (1968). Organizational effectiveness: An inventory of proposi tions. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

20.

Robbins, I.P. (1986). Privatization of corrections: Defining the issues. Judi cature, 69, 324-331.

21.

Ruchelman, L. (1974). Police politics: A comparative study of three cities. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.

22.

Schon, D.A. (1971). Beyond the stable state. New York: Norton.

23.

Shearing, C.D. & Stenning, P.C. (1981). Modern private security: Its growth and implications. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice (vol. 3) (pp. 193-246). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

24.

Wakefield, W. & Webb, V.J. (1979). An application of the interorganiza tional perspective to community-based corrections in an urban area. Crim inal Justice Review, 4, 41-50.

25.

Warren, R.L. (1983). The sociology of knowledge and the problems of the inner cities. In R.L. Warren & L. Lyons (Eds.), New perspectives on the American community (pp. 360-373). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

26.

Warren, R.L. , Rose, S.M. & Bergunder, A.B. (1974). The structure of ur ban reform. Lexington, MA: Lexington.

27.

Webb, V.J. & Hoffman, D.E. (1985, October). A survey of citizens crime commissions in the United States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Diego, CA.