A number of studies suggest that crimes and punishments can be scaled. Some evidence indicates, however, that development of such scales may be hampered by the number of items which appropriately can be evaluated by respondents. In the present study two survey instruments were administered to 90 respondents. The results suggest that although the rankings of identical items derived from two survey instruments (one containing a large number of items and the other containing a subset of the larger set) were highly correlated, the instrument containing the larger number of items resulted in several instances of scale item displacement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beccaria, C.
(1963). On crimes and punishments. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merril.
2.
Bridges, G.S.
& Lisagor, N.S. (1975). Scaling seriousness: An evaluation of magnitude and category scaling techniques. Journal of Law and Criminology, 66, 215-221.
3.
Buchner, D.
(1979). Scale of sentence severity. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70, 182-187.
4.
Erickson, M.L.
& Gibbs, J.P. (1978). Objective and perceptual properties of legal punishment and the deterrence doctrine. Social Problems, 25, 253264.
5.
Erickson, M.L.
& Gibbs, J.P. (1979). On the perceived severity of legal penalties. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70, 102-116.
6.
Erickson, M.L.
, Gibbs, J.P., & Jensen, G.F. (1977). The deterrence doctrine and the perceived certainty of legal punishments. American Sociological Review, 42, 305-317.
7.
Figlio, R.M.
(1975). The seriousness of offenses: An evaluation by offenders and nonoffenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 66, 189-200.
8.
Gottfredson, S.D.
, Young, K.L., & Laufer, W.S. (1980). Additivity and interactions in offense seriousness scales. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 17, 26-41.
9.
Miethe, T.D.
(1982). Public consensus on crime seriousness: Normative structure or methodological artifact?Criminology, 20, 515-526.
10.
Riedel, M.
(1975). Perceived circumstances, inferences of intent and judgments of offense seriousness. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 66. 201-208.
11.
Rossi, P.H.
, Waite, E., Bose, C.E., & Berk, R.A. (1974). The seriousness of crimes: Normative structure and individual differences. American Sociological Review, 39, 224-237.
12.
Sebba, J.
(1980). Is mens rea a component of perceived offense seriousness. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 71, 124-135.
13.
Sebba, J.
(1978). Some explorations in the scaling of penalties. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 15, 247-265.
14.
Sellin, T.
& Wolfgang, M.E. (1964). The measurement of delinquency. New York: John Wiley.
15.
Sheley, J.G.
(1980). Crime seriousness ratings: The impact of survey questionnaire form and item context. British Journal of Criminology, 20, 123-135.
16.
Wagner, E.
& Pease, K. (1978). On adding up scores of offense seriousness. British Journal of Criminology, 8, 175-178.
17.
Wellford, C.F.
& Wiatrowski, M. (1975). On the measurement of delinquency. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 66, 175-188.
