The Impact of Restitution on Recidivism of Juvenile Offenders: An Experiment in Clayton County,Georgia

Abstract

Juvenile courts have increasingly been interested in using restitution as a sanction for juvenile offenders, but until recently very little information has been available on the effects of restitution. To assess the impact of restitution on recidivism rates of juveniles, a series of experiments was undertaken as part of a national evaluation of the Juvenile Restitution Initiative, which was funded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP). This study reports on the results from one of those experiments. The findings from the Clayton County, Georgia, experiment indicate that youths required to make restitution to their victims either through community service or monetary payments generally had lower recidivism rates than those given more traditional juvenile court dispositions. Furthermore, the results clearly suggest that restitution works quite well on its own and does not need to be combined with mental health counseling. In contrast with many other types of delinquency programs, the restitution intervention not only had a positive impact when contrasted with traditional dispositions, but actually slowed the delinquency rate of the group. The overall offense rate of the restitution-only group, for example, dropped from approximately one offense per youth, per year, to .74 offenses, per youth for a one-year time period.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beck-Zierdt, N. (1980). Tri-county juvenile restitution program. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Crime Control Board Research and Evaluation Unit.

Bonta,J.L. , Boyle, J. , Mothuk, L. & Sonnichsen, P. (1983). Correctional halfway houses: Victim satisfaction, attitudes and recidivism. Canadian Journal of Corrections, 20, 140-152.

Cannon, A. & Stanford, R.M. (1981). Evaluation of the juvenile alternative services project. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services.

Galaway, B. & Hudson, J. (1978). Offender restitution in theory and action. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Guedalia, L.J. (1979). Predicting recidivism of juvenile delinquents on restitutionary probation: Selected background, subject, and program variables. Doctoral dissertation, The American University, Washington, DC.

Heinz, J. , Galaway, B. , & Hudson, J. (1976). Restitution or parole: A follow-up study of adult offenders. Social Sciences Review, 50, 148-156.

Hofford, M. (1981). Juvenile restitution program (Final Report). Charleston, SC: Trident United Way.

Hudson, J. & Chesney, S. (1978). Research on restitution: A review and assessment. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Ed.) Offender restitution in theory and action (pp. 131-148). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Hudson, J. & Galaway, B. (1977). Victims, offenders, and alternative sancations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

10.

Schneider, A.L. & Reiter, P. (1975). Victim attitudes toward the criminal justice system: Final evaluation report for the Multnomah County Victim Assistance Program. Eugene, OR: Institute for Policy Analysis.

11.

Sutton, R.L. (1976). Victim's assistance program: A summary evaluation.

12.

Las Vegas: Clark County Juvenile Court Services. Wax, W. L. (1977). Effects of symbolic restitution and presence of victim on delinquent shoplifters. Doctoral dissertation, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.