Evaluations of judicical competence and propriety of behavior have generally been negative in the literature on the courts. The present analysis provides further illustration of misbehavior on the part of judges. The data include observations of criminal trials, responses to a questionnaire by attorneys, and interviews with judges. Desirable qualities for judges are discussed together with a look at the distribution of power in a courtroom.
Downie, L. Jr.
(1971). Justice denied. Baltimore, MD: Penguin Books.
3.
Guthman, E.
(1982, May 2). Merit selection of judges deserves a close look. The Philadelphia Inquirer, p. 7-F-7-F.
4.
Morrison, D.
(1982, July 10). City court nominee is said to lack bar-group support. The Philadelphia Inquirer, p. 3-B-3-B.
5.
Newfield, J.
(1976). The two worst judges. In R. Nader & M. Green (Eds.) Verdicts on lawyers (pp. 269-285). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.
6.
Ravitz, J.C.
(1976). Reflections of a radical judge: Beyond the courtroom. In R. Nader & M. Green (Eds.) Verdicts on lawyers (pp. 255-268). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.
7.
Tulsky, EN
. (1982, July 23). Chief justice blocking court reform, Leonard says. The Philadelphia Inquirer, p. 7-B-7-B.
8.
Wice, P.
(1981). Judicial socialization: The Philadelphia experience. In J.A. Cramer (Ed.), The Courts (pp. 149-172), Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
