Adult Probation and Parole Officers: Influence of Their Weapons,Role Perceptions and Role Conflict

Abstract

Conventional wisdom asserts that probation and parole officers experience a high degree of role conflict because of the nature of their job. These officers are expected to provide both treatment and supervision services which have opposed philosophies. This study sought to provide empirical evidence to support this contention and to examine the influences of weapon use on role conflict. The data indicate that Alabama state adult probation officers experience relatively low levels of role conflict with a weak association with weapon use. This low level of role conflict may be attributable to the fact that Alabama adult probation and parole officers receive a substantial cash subsidy for carrying a weapon.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abadinsky, H. (1975). Should parole officers make arrests and carri firearms? Microfiche, No. 01964, Rockville, MD: National Criminal Justice Reference Service.

Biddle, B.J. (1979). Role theorY: Expectations, identities, and behaviors. New York: Academic Press.

Giardini, G.I. (1959). The parole process. Chicago: Charles C. Thomas.

Keve, P.W. (1979). No farewell to arms. Crime and Delinquency, 25,425-435.

Nie, N.H. , Hull, C.H. , Jenkins, J.G. , Steinbrenner, K. , & Bent, D.H. (1975). SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Spica, A. (1980, December). Correctional novagram. Federal Probation, 41(4), 47-51.

Wilson, R. (1977, September). Cop or counselor? A day in the life of a parole agent. Corrections Magazine, 3, 60-63.