Abstract
Sentencing patterns in a middle-sized, Midwestern town are examined over the period 1932 to 1975. Data were gathered from the criminal court dockets and included only cases originally filed as a felony and resulting in a conviction. The analyses indicate that: (a) prosecution offelonies and subsequent convictions did not keep pace with the increase in reported crime; (b) plea bargaining became an extremely common practice in lateryears; (c) the role of court appointed defense counsel changed dramatically; (d) time delays between filing of information and sentencing increased greatly after the mid-i 960s; and (e) sentences to state penal institutions declined over the period of study. Explanations for these changes and related developments are offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
