This paper reports the findings of structural level research into the process of commitment of criminal defendants as incompetent to stand trial because of insanty in Louisiana. Conceptualizing criminal courts as open systems, it was predicted their structural environments would operate as contingencies in the perception and labeling of defendants as being (or having been at the time of the offense) mentally incompetent. Several structural-cultural features were predicted to have contingency effects on forensic commitment. (1) mileage of parish seat to the state s single forensic facility, (2) ruralness, (3) metropolitanism (SAISA status), (4) religious and cultural ethnicity, (5) relative power of the parish population to influence criminal court outcomes, and (6) community climate of repressiveness. These varibles' effects on parish commitment rates were analyzed using path analysis techniques, and results did indicate that the probability of incompetency and criminal insanity labels being applied were contingent on the parishes' social structural characteristics. Interestingly, the proximity of the parish to the hospital had the greatest direct effect on the commitment rate.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Balbus, I.D.The dialectics of legal repression. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1973.
2.
Baldwin, B.
, Floyd, H. H., Jr., & McSeveney, D. R.Status inconsistency and psychiatric diagnosis: A structural approach to labeling theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1975, 34, 257-267.
3.
Bankston, W. B. A structural level examination of forensic hospitalization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 1975.
4.
Bankston, W. B.
, & Cramer, J. A.Toward a macro-sociological interpretation of general deterrence. Criminology, 1974, 12, 251-277.
5.
Bittner, E.Peace-keeping on skid-row. In W. Chambliss (Ed.), Crime and the legal process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.
6.
Black, D J.The social organization of arrest
. Stanford LawReview, 1971. 23, 1104-1110.
7.
Blumberg, AThe practice of law as a confidence game
. Law and Society Review, 1967. 1, 15-19.
8.
Carlin, J. E.Lawyer's ethics. In R. Schwartz & J. Skolnick (Eds.), Society and the legal order. New York: Basic Books, 1970.
9.
Cicourel, A.The social organization of juvenile justice. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1968.
10.
Clinard, M.The sociology of deviant behavior (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1974.
11.
Cole, G.The decision to prosecute
. Law and Society Review, 1970, 4, 331-344.
12.
Cressey, D. R.Role theory, differential association, and compulsive crimes. In D. R. Cressey & D. Ward (Eds.), Delinquency, crime, and social process. New York: Harper and Row, 1969.
13.
Currie, E.Crimes without criminals: Witchcraft and its control in Renaissance Europe
. Law and Society Review, 1968, 3, 7-32.
14.
Dolbeare, K.Trial courts in urban politics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1967.
15.
Douglas, J. D.Deviance and order in a pluralistic society. In J. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakain (Eds.), Theoretical sociology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970.
16.
Durkheim, E.[Suicide] (J. A. Spaulding & G. Simpson, trans.). New York: Free Press, 1951.
17.
Durkheim, E.[The rules of sociological method] (S. A. Solsvay & J. H. Mueller, trans.). New York: Free Press, 1964. (a)
18.
Durkheim. E.[The division of labor in society] (G. Simpson, trans.). New York: Free Press, 1964. (b)
19.
Erikson, K.Wayward puritans. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1966.
20.
Fingarette, H.The meaning of criminal insanity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.
21.
Friedman, L.Legal rules and the process of social change
. Stanford Law Review, 1967, 19, 798-8 10.
22.
Garfinkel, H.Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. In E. Rubington & M. S. Weinberg (Eds.), Deviance: The interactionist perspective (2nd ed.). New York: MacMillan Company, 1973.
23.
Goffman, E.Asylums. New York: Doubleday Anchor, 1961.
24.
Goffman, E.The moral career of the mental patient. In S. Spitzer & N. Denzin (Eds.), The mental patient. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.
25.
Gove, W. R.
(Ed.). The labelling of deviance. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1975.
26.
Green, P. Legal sanctions and the division of labor. Unpublished masters thesis, University of New Orleans, 1974.
27.
Grosman, B. A.The prosecutor: An inquiry into the exercise of discretion. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1969.
28.
Gusfield, J. R.Moral passage: The symbolic process in public designations of deviance. In W. Filstead (Ed.), An introduction to deviance. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company, 1972.
29.
Halleck, S. L.The psychiatrist and the legal process
. Psychology Today, 1969, 2, 25-28.
30.
Halleck, S. L.A troubled view of current trends in forensic psychiatry
. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 1974, 20, 135-157.
31.
Hogarth, J.Sentencing as a human process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1971.
32.
Jaffe, J.Civil commitment of the mentally ill
. Penmnswvlania Law Review, 1959, 107, 668-685.
33.
Jaros. D.
, & Mendelsohn, R.The judicial role and sentencing behavior. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 1967, 2, 471-488.
34.
Kitsuse, J.
, & Cicourel, A.A note on the uses of official statistics. Social Problems, 1962, 12, 244-255.
35.
Kutner, J. I.The illusion of due process in commitment proceeding
. Northwestern Law Review, 1962. 57383-399.
36.
LaFave. W.Arrest. The decision to take a suspect into custody. Boston: Little, Brown and Company1965
37.
Levin, M.An empirical evaluation of urban political systems The courts. In D. R. Morgan & S. A. Kirkpatrick (Eds.), Urban political analysis: A systems analysis. New York: The Free Press, 1972.
38.
Louisiana Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration ot Criminal Justice
. Statistical analiv'is of tlic Louisiana law enforcement and criminal justice system. Baton Rouge: Office of the Governor. 1974.
39.
Louisiana Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Criminal Justice
. Statistical analvsis of the Louisiana law enforcement and criminal justice system. Baton Rouge: Office of the Governor. 1975.
40.
Matthews, A. R., Jr.Mental illness and the criminal law. Community health the answer?Washington D).C.1 he American Bar Foundation
, 1967.
41.
McGarry, A.
, Curran, W., Lipsitt, P., Lelos, D., Schwitzgebel, R., & Rosenberg, A.Incompetencv to stand trial and mental illness. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Mental Health. 1973.
42.
Mead, G. H.The social psychology of primitive justice
. American Journal of Sociology, 1928, 23, 557-602.
43.
Mileski, M.Courtroom encounters: An observational study of a lower criminal court
. Law and Society. 1971..5, 473-5 38.
44.
Piliavin, I.
, & Briar, S.Police encounters with juveniles. American Journal of Sociology, 1964, 70, 206-214.
45.
President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice
. Lower Courts. In R. Schwartz & J. Skolnick (Eds.), Society and the legal orderNew York: Basic Books, 1970.
46.
Public Affairs Research Council of Louisiana
. Statistical Profiles. Baton Rouge: Public Affairs Research Council, 1972.
47.
Quinney, R.The social reality of crime. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1970.
48.
Rheinstein, M.Introduction. In M. Weber, [On Law in economy and societyl (E. Shils & M. Rheinstein, trans.). New York: Simon and Schuster, 1954.
49.
Scheff, T. J.Social conditions for rationality: How urban and rural courts deal with the mentally ill. American Behavioral Scientist, March 1964, pp. 21-24.
50.
Scheff, T. J.The societal reaction to deviance. In S. Spitzer & N. Denzin (Eds.), The mental patient. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968. (a)
51.
Scheff, T. J.Negotiating reality: Notes on power in the assessment of responsibility
. Social Problems, 1968. 16, 3-17. (b)
52.
Schur. E.Labeling deviant behavior. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.
53.
Scott, R. A.The making of blind men. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969.
54.
Shugg, R. W.Origins of class struggle in Louisiana. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1968.
55.
Skolnick. J.H. Justice without trial. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 1966.
56.
Skolnick, J. H.Social control and the adversary system
. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1967, 11, 52-70.
57.
Sorokin, P. A.Social and cultural dynamics (Rev. ed.). Boston: Porter Sargent, 1957.
58.
Sudnow, D.Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender's office
. Social Problems, 1965. 12. 255-270.
59.
Turk. A.Criminality and the legal order. Chicago: Rand McNally and Company, 1969.
60.
U.S.Bureau of the Census. City and county' data book. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972. (a)
61.
U.S.Bureau of the Census. General social and economic characteristics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972. (b)
62.
Weber, M.[On law in economy and societyl (E. Shils & M. Rheinstein, trans.). New York: Simon and Schuster, 1954.
63.
Weber, M.{The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism! (T. Parsons, trans.). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1958.
64.
Wexler, D. B.
, & Scoville, S. E.The administration of psychiatric justice. Arizona Law Review, 1971, 13, 1-259.
65.
Wilkinson, G. S.Patient-audience social status and the social construction of psychiatric disorders: Toward a differential frame of reference hypothesis
. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1975, 16, 28-38.
66.
Wilson, J. Q.The police and the delinquent in two cities. In S. Wheeler (Ed.), Controlling Delinquents. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1968.
67.
Wilson, J. Q.Police work in two cities. In E. Rubington & M. S. Weinberg (Eds.), Deviance: The interactionist perspective. New York: The MacMillan Company, 1973.
68.
Zeisel, H.
, Kalven, H., Jr., & Buchholz, B.Justice delayed. In R. Schwartz & J. H. Skolnick (Eds.), Society and the legal order. New York: Basic Books, 1970.
