Alschuler, A.The prosecutor's role in plea bargaining
. University of Chicago Law Review, 1968,36,50-50.
2.
Blumberg, A.Criminaijustice. New York: Quadrangle Books, 1967.
3.
Casper, J.Criminal justice The consumer's perspective. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office1972.
4.
Cole, G.
(Ed.) Criminal justice: Law and politics. Belmont, Calif.: Duxbury Press, 1972.
5.
Cole, G.The decision to prosecute
. Law and Society Review, 1970,4, 331-331.
6.
Feeley, M. M.Two models of the criminal justice system: An organizational perspective
. Law and Society Review, 1973, 7, 407-407.
7.
Feritta, R.Comparative study of prosecutor's offices: Baltimore and Houston
. The Prosecutor, 1969, 5, 48-48.
8.
Ingraham, B. L.The impact of Argersinger One year later
. Law and Society Review, 1974,8, 615-615.
9.
Mather, L. M.Some determinants of the method of case disposition: Decision-making by public defenders in Los Angeles
. Law and Society Review, 1973,8, 187-187.
10.
Neubauer, D. W.Criminaljustice in middleAmerica. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press, 1974.
11.
Newman, D.Pleading guilty for considerations: A study of bargain justice
. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 1956, 46, 780-780.
12.
Oaks, D.
, & Lehman, W.A criminal justice system and the indigent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
13.
Packer, H. L.The limits of the criminal sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1968.
14.
Rosett, A.The negotiated guilty plea
. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 1967,374, 70-70.
15.
Smith, G. W.
, & Wendell, M. A.Public defenders and private attorneys: A comparison of cases. The Legal Aid Brief Case, 1968, 27, 95-95.
16.
Vetri, D. R.Note Gilty plea bargaining: Compromises by prosecutors to secure guilty pleas
. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1964,112, 865-865.
