Over the last 40 years, research and advocacy around wrongful convictions has accelerated and, in turn, produced more widespread awareness on the contributors to system errors. Specifically, exoneration data dating to 1989 point to increased discoveries of official misconduct in convictions of the innocent. Prior research shows who commits official misconduct and the acts in which they engage, but gaps between wrongful convictions scholarship and law persist. In this paper, I conducted a content analysis of criminal official misconduct statutes in 20 U.S. jurisdictions. I examined how acts, perpetrators, and sanctions are characterized in law, aiming to provide researchers with a legal framework for contextualizing official misconduct in wrongful convictions. The study's findings demonstrate how the relationship between law and scholarship can be mutually informative for addressing system errors. Particularly, I discuss how a legal framework can help scholars and legal officials understand the nuances of misconduct and, in turn, develop a more concrete interpretation of particular acts and perpetrators. I conclude by addressing the importance of these results for future works on official misconduct as a contributor to miscarriages of justice.
BattsA. W.deLoneM.StephensD. W. (2014). Policing and wrongful convictions. New perspectives in policing bulletin. DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, p. NCJ 246328.
6.
BerubeR.WilfordM. M.RedlichA. D.WangY. (2022). Identifying patterns across the six canonical factors underlying wrongful convictions. The Wrongful Conviction Law Review, 3(3), 166–195. https://doi.org/10.29173/wclawr82
7.
BettensT.RedlichA. D. (2024). The effects of confessions on misconduct and guilty pleas in exonerations: Implications for discovery policies. Criminology & Public Policy, 23(1), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12643
8.
BonventreC. L. (2020). Wrongful convictions and forensic science. WIREs Forensic Science, 3, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1406
9.
BorchardE. M. (1932). Convicting the innocent: Errors of criminal justice. Yale University Press.
ColeS. A. (2012). Forensic science and wrongful convictions: From exposer to contributor to corrector. New England Law Review, 46(4), 711–736.
13.
CoveyR. (2013). Police misconduct as a cause of wrongful convictions. Washington University Law Review, 90, 1133–1189.
14.
CovingtonB. (2021). State official misconduct statutes and anticorruption federalism after Kelly v. United States. Columbia Law Review Forum, 121(8), 273–302.
DonovanK. M.KlahmC. F.IV (2018). How priming innocence influences public opinion on police misconduct and false convictions: A research note. Criminal Justice Review, 43(2), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016817707809
17.
DrummondC. B.MillsM. N. (2020). Addressing official misconduct: Increasing accountability in reducing wrongful convictions. Wrongful Conviction Law Review, 1(3), 270–290. https://doi.org/10.29173/wclawr34
18.
EitleD.D’AlessioS. J.StolzenbergL. (2014). The effect of organizational and environmental factors on police misconduct. Police Quarterly, 17(2), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611114522042
19.
FisterD. L. (1969). Criminal law–official misconduct–the need for legislative reform. Kentucky Law Journal, 57(3), 598–605.
20.
GarrettB. L. (2005). Innocence, harmless error, and federal wrongful conviction law. Wisconsin Law Review, 2005(1), 35–114.
21.
GarrettB. L.NeufeldP. J. (2009). Invalid forensic science testimony and wrongful convictions. Virginia Law Review, 95(1), 1–97. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25475240
22.
GettyR. M.WorrallJ. L.MorrisR. G. (2016). How far from the tree does the apple fall? Field training officers, their trainees, and allegations of misconduct. Crime & Delinquency, 62(6), 821–839. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714545829
GouldJ. B.LeoR. A. (2010). One hundred years later: Wrongful convictions after a century of research. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100(3), 825–868. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25766110
26.
GrossS. R.PossleyM. J.RollK. J.StephensK. H. (2020). Government misconduct and convicting the innocent: The role of prosecutors, police and other law enforcement. National Registry of Exonerations.
27.
GrossS. R.PossleyM. J.StephensK. (2017). Race and wrongful convictions in the United States. National Registry of Exonerations.
28.
HassellK. D.ArchboldC. A. (2010). Widening the scope on complaints of police misconduct. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 33(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511011066863
29.
HenningP. J. (1999). Prosecutorial misconduct and constitutional remedies. Washington University Law Quarterly, 77(3), 713–834.
30.
HenryJ. S. (2020). Smoke but no fire: Convicting the innocent of crimes that never happened. University of California Press.
31.
HicksW. D.MullinixK. J.NorrisR. J. (2021). The politics of wrongful conviction legislation. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 21(3), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/spq.2020.4
IvkovicS. K. (2009). Rotten apples, rotten branches, and rotten orchards: A cautionary tale of police misconduct. Criminology and Public Policy, 8(4), 777–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00593.x
35.
JoyP. A. (2006). The relationship between prosecutorial misconduct and wrongful convictions: Shaping remedies for a broken system. Wisconsin Law Review, 2006(2), 399–430.
KassinS. M.CardenasS. A.MeterkoV.BarksdaleF. (2022). Prosecutorial misconduct: Assessment of perspectives from the bench. Court Review, 58(4), 162–169.
38.
KentS. L.CarmichaelJ. T. (2015). Legislative responses to wrongful conviction: Do partisan principals and advocacy efforts influence state-level criminal justice policy?Social Science Research, 52, 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.01.004
39.
LeoR. A. (2005). Rethinking the study of miscarriages of justice: Developing a criminology of wrongful conviction. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(3), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986205277477
40.
LeoR. A. (2017). The criminology of wrongful conviction: A decade later. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33(1), 82–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986216673013
41.
LeoR. A.DavisD. (2010). From false confession to wrongful conviction: Seven psychological processes. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 38(1&2), 9–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/009318531003800103
42.
LeoR. A.OfsheR. J. (1998). The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88(2), 429–496. https://doi.org/10.2307/1144288
43.
MadrigalA. J.NorrisR. J. (2022). The good, the bad, and the uncertain: State harm, the aftermath of exoneration, and compensation for the wrongly convicted. Critical Criminology, 30(4), 895–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-022-09656-7
44.
MedwedD. (2012). Prosecution complex: America’s race to convict and its impact on the innocent. New York University Press.
45.
Miranda v. Arizona. (1966). 384 U.S. 436.
46.
MogaveroM. C.HsuK. H.BolgerP. C. (2022). A conjunctive analysis of false accusations, official misconduct, and race in violent and sexual exonerations cases. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 40(6), 756–786. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2587
NorrisR. J. (2017). Framing DNA: Social movement theory and the foundations of the innocence movement. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 33(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986216673014
64.
NorrisR. J.AckerJ. R.BonventreC. L.RedlichA. D. (2020). Thirty years of innocence: Wrongful convictions and exonerations in the United States, 1989-2018. Wrongful Conviction Law Review, 1(1), 2–58. https://doi.org/10.29173/wclawr11
65.
NorrisR. J.BonventreC. L.RedlichA. D.AckerJ. R.LoweC. (2019). Preventing wrongful convictions: An analysis of state investigation reforms. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(4), 597–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403416687359
66.
NorrisR. J.HicksW. D.MullinixK. J. (2023). The politics of innocence: How wrongful convictions shape public opinion. NYU Press.
PorterL. E. (2021). Police misconduct. In DunhamR. E.AlpertG. P.McLeanK. D. (Eds.), Critical issues in policing: Contemporary readings (8th Ed., pp. 261–278). Waveland Press.
69.
PunchM. (2000). Police corruption and its prevention. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8(3), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008777013115
70.
RidolfiK. M.PossleyM. (2010). Preventable error: A report on prosecutorial misconduct in California 1997-2009. Northern California Innocence Project.
71.
RubinA. T. (2021). Rocking qualitative social science: An irreverent guide to rigorous research (1st ed.). Stanford University Press.
72.
SaksM. J.ConstantineL.DolezalM.GarciaJ. (2001). Toward a model act for the prevention and remedy of erroneous convictions. New England Law Review, 35(3), 669–684.
73.
ScheckB.NeufeldP.DwyerJ. (2000). Actual innocence: Five days to execution and other dispatches from the wrongly convicted. Doubleday.
TrivediS.Van CleveN. G. (2020). To serve and protect each other: How police-prosecutor codependence enables police misconduct. Boston University Law Review, 100(3), 895–934.
WebsterE. (2020). The prosecutor as a final safeguard against false convictions: How prosecutors assist with exoneration. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 110(2), 245–306.
82.
WesterveltS. D.CookK. J. (2010). Framing innocents: The wrongly convicted as victims of state harm. Crime, Law and Social Change, 53, 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-009-9231-z
83.
ZalmanM. (2006). Criminal justice system reform and wrongful conviction: A research agenda. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17(4), 468–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403406292740
84.
ZalmanM. (2010/2011). An integrated justice model of wrongful convictions. Albany Law Review, 74(3), 1465–1524.
85.
ZalmanM.CarranoJ. (2013/2014). Sustainability of innocence reform. Albany Law Review, 77(3), 955–1004.
