Older people (50+) are a growing proportion of the prison population. Upon release from prison, they contend with deteriorating physical and mental health, obtaining housing, work, and navigating modern technology with limited family support. The current study aims to understand what support is available for older people leaving prison in the state of New Jersey. Two minifocus groups were conducted and included representatives from a variety of community-based organizations across the state. Results indicated that older people require a great deal of support leaving prison, but no programs address those needs specifically. Program providers shared the difficulties in supporting this population and their willingness to collaborate across organizations. However, uncertainty about how to connect and roadblocks from superiors stifled respondents’ efforts. Weighty guidance and creativity were necessary to provide support. Directions for future research and actionable recommendations are discussed.
BrownG. P.GrecoC. (2024). The well-being of older offenders on release in the community. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 0306624X231219222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X231219222
5.
Campagnaa, L. M., & Murolo, A. S. (2025). RESEARCH BRIEF: Ghosting in the realm of research: The realities of conducting social science research in the digital age. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice and Criminology, 14(1), 158–165.
6.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
7.
ColibabaA.SkinnerM. W.BalfourG.ByrneD.DielemanC. (2023). Community reintegration of previously incarcerated older adults: Exploratory insights from a Canadian community residential facility program. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 35(4), 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2022.2029269
8.
CrawleyE.SparksR. (2006). Is there life after imprisonment? How elderly men talk about imprisonment and release. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 6(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895806060667
9.
CronholmS. (2002). Grounded Theory in use–a review of experiences. Proceedings of European Conference on Research Methods in Business, Reading.
10.
CullenF. T. (1994). Social support as an organizing concept for criminology: Presidential address to the academy of criminal justice sciences. Justice Quarterly, 11(4), 527–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829400092421
11.
DeyI. (2004). Grounded theory. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, D. Silverman (Eds.) Grounded theory (pp. 81–94). SAGE Publications Ltd, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608191.d9.
12.
DillmanD. A.SmythJ. D.ChristianL. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method.
13.
DiTomasM.AugustineD.WilliamsB. A. (2022). Growing older: Challenges of prison and reentry for the aging population. In GreifingerRB (Ed.), Public health behind bars: From prisons to communities. Springer, pp. 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1807-3_5
14.
DivakaranB.BlochN.SinhaM.SteinerA.ShavitS. (2023). The reentry health care hub: Creating a California-based referral system to link chronically ill people leaving prison to primary care. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(10), 5806. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5806/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105806
EckJ. E. (2006). When is a Bologna sandwich better than sex? A defense of small-n case study evaluations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-006-9014-9
GatesM. L.HunterE. G.DicksV.JessaP. N.WalkerV.YooW. (2018). Multimorbidity patterns and associations with functional limitations among an aging population in prison. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 77, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2018.03.012
GrosholzJ. M.ThomasD. M.StoneS. S.FogelS. J.PorcelliT. N. (2024). “Nobody is really going to hire a 69-year-old man with a felony record”: Challenges finding employment for older, formerly incarcerated individuals. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 63(6), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2024.2370291
21.
HughesM. H.ten BenselT. (2022). “Stuck in their ways”: Examining parole officers’ perceptions on guiding older offenders through the reentry process. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(2), 287–305. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-021-09613-0.
22.
JimenezL. B.CrossS. H.BoucherN. A. (2021). “He needed just about everything”: Caring for aging adults postincarceration. Journal of Applied Gerontology : The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 40(12), 1828–1836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464821990511
23.
KaiksowF. A.BrownL.MerssK. B. (2023). Caring for the rapidly aging incarcerated population: The role of policy. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49(3), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20230209-02
24.
KruegerR. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th Ed.). Sage publications.
25.
La VigneN.DaviesE.PalmerT.HalberstadtR. (2008). Release planning for successful reentry. A guide for corrections, service providers, and community groups. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/71348466.pdf
26.
LinN. (1986). Conceptualizing social support. In LinDeanEdsel (eds.). Social support, life events, and depression (17–30). Academic Press.
27.
MaguireM.RaynorP. (2017). Offender management in and after prison: The end of ‘end to end’?Criminology & Criminal Justice, 17(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895816665435
28.
Murolo, A. S. (2022). Aging on Parole: An empirical analysis of reentry, reintegration, and life satisfaction (Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York).
OnyealiR.HowellB. A.McInnesD. K.EmersonA.WilliamsM. E. (2023). The case for transitional services and programs for older adults reentering society: A narrative review of US departments of correction and recommendations. International Journal of Prisoner Health, 19(1), 4–19. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-08-2021-0073
31.
PasmaA. J.Van GinnekenE.PalmenH.NieuwbeertaP. (2023). Professional support and re-entry preparedness among prisoners. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 17488958231161432. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1177/17488958231161432
32.
PuglieseK.MellowJ. (2024). Reimagining housing during reentry: A process evaluation of the village of hope transitional housing program. Corrections, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2024.2426105
33.
SawyerW.WagnerP. (2020). Mass incarceration: The whole pie 2020 (Vol. 24). MA: Prison Policy Initiative.
SolomonL.MontagueB. T.BeckwithC. G.BaillargeonJ.CostaM.DumontD.KuoI.KurthA.RichJ. D. (2014). Survey finds that many prisons and jails have room to improve HIV testing and coordination of postrelease treatment. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 33(3), 434–442. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1115
36.
StarksH.Brown TrinidadS. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1372–1380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307307031
37.
SternM. J.BilgenI.DillmanD. A. (2014). The state of survey methodology: Challenges, dilemmas, and new frontiers in the era of the tailored design. Field Methods, 26(3), 284–301.
38.
TillA.ExworthyT.ForresterA. (2015). Integration and offender mental health. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 26(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2014.960440
39.
TimmermansS.TavoryI. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
VauxA. (1988). Social support: Theory, research, and intervention. Praeger publishers.
42.
WesternB.BragaA. A.DavisJ.SiroisC. (2015). Stress and hardship after prison. American Journal of Sociology, 120(5), 1512–1547. https://doi.org/10.1086/681301
