This rebuttal to Marina Sorochinski's work, “Beyond the Badge: A Critical Commentary on B. Beyer's ‘Rethinking the False Confession Phenomenon,’” identifies and analyzes Sorochinski's pervasive pattern of misinterpretation, mischaracterization, and outright fabrication of points made in “Rethinking the False Confession Phenomenon: A Law Enforcement Perspective.” Sorochinski's hyperemotional response to this work, her unwillingness to consider alternative points of view on the false confession issue, her dismissal of practitioner insights, and her reliance on the unanimity of thought in the existing false confession literature are highlighted and discussed. Through an analysis of the existing false confession literature and the inaccurately reported positions of “Rethinking the False Confession Phenomenon,” an argument is outlined for why the false confession research and related conclusions should be questioned, the statistics surrounding the false confession phenomenon should be more closely analyzed, the underlying biases present within the innocence movement should be considered, and alternative positions should not be so easily and reflexively dismissed. This rebuttal helps to elucidate not only the emotional advocacy that undergirds Sorochinski's critique, put the potential problems that may arise if this same emotional advocacy is shared by other false confession researchers.
BernhardP. A.MillerR. S. (2018). Juror perceptions of false confessions versus witness recantations. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(4), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1463874
2.
BeyerB. J. (2023). Rethinking the false confession phenomenon: A law enforcement perspective. Defiance Press & Publishing, LLC.
3.
BradfordD.Goodman-DelahuntyJ. (2008). Detecting deception in police investigations: Implications for false confessions. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 15, 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710701873932
4.
BrandlS. G. (2014). Criminal investigation. Sage.
5.
BullR.SoukaraS. (2009). Four studies of what really happens in police interviews. In LassiterG. D.MeissnerC. (Eds.), Police interrogations and confessions: Current research, practice and policy recommendations (pp. 249–263). American Psychological Association.
6.
CassellP. G. (1997). Balanced approaches to the false confession problem: A brief comment on Ofshe, Leo, and Alschuler. Denver Law Review, 74(4), 1123–1133.
7.
CassellP. G. (1998). Protecting the innocent from false confessions and lost confessions—and from Miranda. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88(2), 497–556. https://doi.org/10.2307/1144289
8.
ChapmanF. E. (2013). Coerced internalized false confessions and police interrogations: The power of coercion. Law and Psychology Review, 37, 159–209. https://doi.org/10https://doi.org/ .2139/ssrn.2467049
9.
ContiR. P. (1999). The psychology of false confessions. The Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology, 2(1), 14–36.
10.
DavisD.LeoR. A. (2012). Interrogation-related regulatory decline: Ego depletion, failures of self-regulation, and the decision to confess. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18(4), 673–704. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027367
11.
DrizinS. A.LeoR. A. (2004). The problem of false confession in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 891–1007.
GrossS. R.PossleyM.OtterbourgK.StephensK.ParedesJ.O’BrienB. (2022). Race and wrongful convictions in the United States. National Registry of Exonerations.
17.
Haney-CaronE.GoldsteinN. E. S.MesiarikC. (2018). Self-perceived likelihood of false confession: A comparison of justice-involved juveniles and adults. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(12), 1955–1976. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818799806
18.
HaselL. E.KassinS. M. (2009). On the presumption of evidentiary independence: Can confessions corrupt eyewitness identification?Psychological Science, 20, 122–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02262.x
19.
InbauF. E.ReidJ. E.BuckleyJ. P.JayneB. C. (1986). Criminal interrogation and confessions (3rd d.). Williams & Wilkins.
20.
JohnsonM. B.DruckerJ. (2009). Two recently confirmed false confessions: Byron A. Halsey and Jeffrey M. Deskovic. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 37, 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2063
21.
JoselowM. (2019). Promise-induced false confessions: Lessons from promises in another context. Boston College Law Review, 60, 1641–1687.
22.
KassinS. M. (2005). On the psychology of confession: Does innocence put innocents at risk?American Psychologist, 60, 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215
23.
KassinS. M. (2008). False confessions: Causes, consequences, and implications for reform. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214548678
24.
KassinS. M.ApplebyS. C.Torkildson PerilloJ. (2010a). Interviewing suspects: Practice, science, and future directions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X449361
25.
KassinS. M.DrizinS. A.GrissoT.GudjonssonG. H.LeoR. A.RedlichA. D. (2010b). Police-induced confessions: Risk factors and recommendations. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6
26.
KassinS. M.FongC. T. (1999). “I’m innocent!”: Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 23(5), 499–516. https://doi.org/0147-7307/99/1000-0499
27.
KassinS. M.GudjonssonG. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(2), 33–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00016.x
28.
KassinS. M.KiechelK. L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7, 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00344.x
29.
KassinS. M.LeoR. A.MeissnerC. A.RichmanK. D.ColwellL. H.LeachA.-M.LaFonD. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law & Human Behavior, 31, 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9073-5
30.
KassinS. M.McNallK. (1991). Police interrogations and confessions: Communicating promises and threats by pragmatic implication. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 233–251. https://doi.org/0147-7307/91/0600-0233$06.50/0
KassinS. M.RedlichA. D.AlcesteF.LukeT. J. (2018). On the general acceptance of confessions research: Opinions of the scientific community. American Psychologist, 73, 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1037llamp0000141
33.
KlaverJ. R.LeeZ.RoseV. G. (2008). Effects of personality, interrogation techniques and plausibility in an experimental false confession paradigm. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532507X193051
34.
KostelnikJ. O.ReppucciN. D. (2009). Reid training and sensitivity to developmental maturity in interrogation: Results from a national survey of police. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27, 361–379. https://doi.org/www.interscience.wiley.com/https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.871
35.
LackeyJ. (2020). False confessions and testimonial injustice. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 110(1), 43–68. https://doi.org/0091-4169/20/11001-0043
36.
LeoR. A. (1996). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 266–303. https://doi.org/10.2307/1144028
37.
LeoR. A. (2007). Police interrogation, false confessions, and alleged child abuse cases. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 50, 693–721.
38.
LeoR. A.LiuB. (2009). What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions?Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.872
39.
MalloyL. C.ShulmanE. P.CauffmanE. (2014). Interrogations, confessions, and guilty pleas among serious adolescent offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 38(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000065
40.
MeissnerC. A.KassinS. M. (2002). He’s guilty!: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 469–480. https://doi.org/0147-7307/02/1000-0469/1
41.
NewringK. A. B.O’DonohueW. (2008). False confessions and influenced witnesses. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 4(1), 81–107.
42.
PerezD. A. (2012). The (in)admissibility of false confession expert testimony. Touro Law Review, 26(1), 23–52.
43.
RedlichA. D. (2004). Law & psychiatry: Mental illness, police interrogations, and the potential for false confession. Psychiatric Services, 55(1), 19–21. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.55.1.19
44.
RedlichA. D.SummersA.HooverS. (2010). Self-reported false confessions and guilty pleas among offenders with mental illness. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9194-8
TrocinoC. J. (2016). You can’t handle the truth: A primer on false confessions. University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review, 16(1), 85–100.
50.
WaxmanS. P. (2020). Innocent juvenile confessions. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 110(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/0091-4169/20/11001-0001
51.
WoodyW. D.ForrestK. D. (2009). Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors’ verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27, 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.865
52.
WoodyW. D.StewartJ. M.ForrestK. D.CamachoL. J.WoestehoffS. A.ProvenzaK. P.WalkerA. T.PownerS. J. (2018). Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors, juries, and judges. Cogent Psychology, 5, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1528744
