Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-9
Parents and Best Friends Perceived Reaction to Participant Deviance and Self-Reported Delinquency: Moderation by Sex and Mediation by Youth Attitude Toward Deviance in Mid- to Late Adolescence
The current study set out to determine whether youth perceptions of parental and best friends’ likely reactions to their involvement in deviant behavior influenced their own attitude toward deviance (AD) and propensity for future delinquency. It also asked whether the effect was conditional on participant sex. Relationships between time-ordered measures of youth perceptions of mother, father, and best friends’ likely reactions to participant deviance, the youth’s own AD, and the youth’s level of participation in subsequent delinquency were tested in a sample of 3,880 adolescents (mean age = 15.33 years at the start of the study, 50.6% male). A moderated mediation path analysis revealed that perceived acceptance of participant deviance by the individual’s best friends predicted a rise in participant positive attitudes toward deviance, which, in turn, led to a rise in future delinquency. There was no effect, however, for mother or father perceived attitudes toward participant deviance. These results further revealed that the effect was moderated by sex and only significant in boys. From these results, it can be surmised that best friends’ perceived reactions to deviance may have an indirect effect on future delinquency of male youth by shaping and influencing the youth’s own AD.
AkersR. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Northeastern University Press.
2.
AllisonP. D. (2002). Missing data. Sage.
3.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
4.
BanduraA. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
5.
BrownB. B.BakkenJ. P. (2011). Parenting and peer relationships: Reinvigorating research on family–peer linkages in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 153–165.
6.
BrownfieldD.ThompsonK. (2005). Self-concept and delinquency: The effects of reflected appraisals by parent and peers. Western Criminology Review, 6, 22–29.
7.
Chesney-LindM.PaskoL. (2004). The female offender: Girls, women and crime (2nd ed.). Sage.
8.
ColeD. A.MaxwellS. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577.
9.
DeutschA. R.CrockettL. J.WolffJ. M.RussellS. T. (2012). Parent and peer pathways to adolescent delinquency: Variations by ethnicity and neighborhood context. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 1078–1094.
10.
ElliottD. S. (1976–1980). National youth survey (United States): Waves 1–5, 1976–1980. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
11.
ElseyH.OwireduE.ThomsonH.MannG.MehtaR.SiddiqiK. (2015). Do children overestimate the extent of smoking among their peers? A feasibility study of the social norms approach to prevent smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 41, 7–11.
12.
ElwertF.WinshipC. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 31–53.
13.
FaganA. A.Van HornM. L.AntaramianS.HawkinsJ. D. (2011). How do families matter? Age and gender differences in family influences on delinquency and drug use. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 9, 150–170.
14.
ForgatchM.SnyderJ. J.PattersonG. R.PauldineM. R.ChawY.ElishK.HarrisJ. B.RichardsonE. B. (2016). Resurrecting the chimera: Progressions in parenting and peer processes. Development and Psychopathology, 28, 689–706.
15.
GottfredsonM. R.HirschiT. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.
16.
HaugS.UlbrichtS.HankeM.MeyerC.JohnU. (2011). Overestimation of drinking norms and its association with alcohol consumption in apprentices. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 46, 204–209.
17.
HaynieD. L.OsgoodD. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter?Social Forces, 84, 1109–1130.
18.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
19.
HoebenE. M.ThomasK. J. (2019). Peers and offender decision-making. Criminology and Public Policy, 18, 759–784.
20.
ImaiK.KeeleL.YamamotoT. (2010). Identification, inference, and sensitivity analysis for causal mediation effects. Statistical Science, 25, 51–71.
21.
JanssenH. J.EichelsheimV. I.DekovićM.BruinsmaG. J. N. (2017). Sex differences in longitudinal pathways from parenting to delinquency. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 23, 503–521.
LandsheerJ. A.HartH. (2000). Punishments adolescents find justified: An examination of attitudes toward delinquency. Adolescence, 35, 683–693.
24.
LansfordJ. E.CrissM. M.PettitG. S.DodgeK. A.BatesJ. E. (2003). Friendship quality, peer group affiliation, and peer antisocial behavior as moderators of the link between negative parenting and adolescent externalizing behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 161–184.
25.
LeeJ. S.TajimaE. A.HerrenkohlT. I.HongS. (2017). Effects of formal and informal deviant labels in adolescence and crime in adulthood. Social Work Research, 41, 97–109.
26.
MatsuedaR. L. (1992). Reflected appraisals, parental labeling, and delinquency: Specifying a symbolic interactionist theory. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1577–1611.
27.
McCoyS. S.DimlerL. M.SamuelsD. V.NatsuakiM. N. (2019). Adolescent susceptibility to deviant peer pressure: Does gender matter?Adolescent Research Review, 4, 59–71.
28.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press.
29.
MillerW. E. (1999). Temporal order and causal inference. Political Analysis, 8, 119–146.
30.
MuthénB.MuthénL. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén and Muthén.
31.
PapeH. (2012). Young people’s overestimation of peer substance use: An exaggerated phenomenon?Addiction, 107, 878–884.
32.
PaternosterR. (2001). Youths and deterrence: Columbia, South Carolina, 1979–1981 [Computer file]. 2nd ICPSR version. University of Maryland [producer], 1985. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
33.
PreacherK. J. (2015). Advances in mediation analysis: A survey and synthesis of new developments. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 825–852.
34.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
35.
ReissA. J. (1951). Delinquency as the failure of personal and social controls. American Sociological Review, 16, 196–207.
36.
RoditisM. L.DelucchiK.ChangA.Halpern-FelsherB. (2016). Perceptions of social norms and exposure to pro-marijuana messages are associated with adolescent marijuana use. Preventive Medicine, 93, 171–176.
37.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Mifflin.
38.
ShulmanE. P.SmithA. RSilvaK.IcenogleG.DuellN.CheinJ.SteinbergL. (2016). The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 103–112.
39.
SobelM. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methods, 13, 290–312.
40.
SteinbergL. (2010). A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Psychobiology, 52, 216–224.
41.
SutherlandE. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). J.B. Lippincott.
42.
SvenssonR.PauwelsL. J. R.WeermanF. M.BruinsmaJ. N. (2017). Explaining individual changes in moral values and moral emotions among adolescent boys and girls: A fixed effects analysis. European Journal of Criminology, 14, 290–308.
TruccoE. M.ColderC. R.WieczorekW. F. (2011). Vulnerability to peer influence: A moderated mediation study of early adolescent alcohol use initiation. Addictive Behaviors, 36, 729–736.
45.
WalkerL. J.HenningK. H.KrettenauerT. (2000). Parent and peer contexts for children’s moral reasoning development. Child Development, 71, 1033–1048.
46.
WaltersG. D. (2015). Proactive criminal thinking and the transmission of differential association: A cross-lagged multi-wave path analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 1128–1144.
47.
WaltersG. D. (2016a). Friends, cognition, and delinquency: Proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects among male delinquents. Justice Quarterly, 33, 1055–1079.
48.
WaltersG. D. (2016b). Reflected appraisals and self-view in delinquency development: An analysis of retrospective accounts from members of the Racine birth cohorts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 47, 100–107.
49.
WaltersG. D. (2020). Positive parents and negative peers: Assessing the nature and order of caregiver and friend effects in predicting early delinquency. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 18, 96–114.
50.
WebsterR. G.VermeulenS. C. (2011). Tolerance for law violations and social projection among offenders and nonoffenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1028–1041.
51.
ZhangQ.LoeberR.Stouthamer-LoeberM. (1997). Developmental trends of delinquent attitudes and behaviors: Replications and synthesis across domains, times, and samples. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 13, 181–215.
