“Upskirting” or video voyeurism involves the use of video cameras in public spaces to record underneath women’s clothing. This activity became commonplace with the advent of cell phones cameras and other small video recording devices. A prior 2006 analysis of statutes aimed at criminalizing the practice of upskirting revealed that two thirds of the statutes require that a violation of privacy occurs before a crime has been committed. Some state courts have held that this was not a crime since there were no statute specifically prohibiting such behavior. This article examines state and federal statutes related to upskirting in an effort to determine how these laws have evolved in the 10 years since the original study.
AbelG. G.BeckerJ. V.MittelmanM.Cunningham-RathnerJ.RouleauJ. L.MurphyW. D. (1987). Self-reported sex crimes of nonincarcerated paraphiliacs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 3–25. doi: 10.1177/088626087002001001
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
BellV.HemmensC.SteinerB. (2006). Up skirts and down blouses: A statutory analysis of legislative responses to video voyeurism. Criminal Justice Studies, 19, 301–314.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608. doi:10.2307/2094589
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2015). National-incident based reporting system (NIBRS). Data tables: “Arrestees, age by arrest offense category”. Retrieved June 27, 2017, fromhttps://ucr.fbi.gov/nibrs/2015/tables/data-tables
KarN.KoolaM. M. (2007). A pilot survey of sexual functioning and preferences in a sample of English-speaking adults from a small south Indian town. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 4, 1254–1261. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00543.x
14.
LångströmN. (2010). The DSM diagnostic criteria for exhibitionism, voyeurism, and frotteurism. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 317–324. doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9577-4
15.
LångströmN.SetoM. C. (2006). Exhibitionistic and voyeuristic behavior in a Swedish national population survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 427–435. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9042-6
16.
LorandS.SchneerH. I. (1967). Sexual deviations III: Fetishism, transvestism, masochism, sadism, exhibitionism, voyeurism, incest, pedophilia, and bestiality. In FreedmanA. M.KaplanH. I. (Eds.), Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (pp. 977–988). Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
17.
MetzlJ. M. (2004). Voyeur nation? Changing definitions of voyeurism, 1950-2004. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 12, 127–131.
18.
PopeM. (1999). Technology arms peeping toms with a new and dangerous arsenal: A compelling need for states to adopt new legislation. John Marshall Journal of Computer and Information Law, 17, 1167.
19.
RothenbergL. E. (2001). Re-thinking privacy: Peeping Toms, video voyeurs, and the failure of the criminal law to recognize a reasonable expectation of privacy in the public space. American University Law Review, 49, 1127–1165.
20.
TemplemanT. L.StinnettR. D. (1991). Patterns of sexual arousal and history in a “normal” sample of young men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 20, 137–150. doi:10.1007/BF01541940
21.
Video Voyeurism Prevention Act, 18 U.S. C. § 1801 (2004).
22.
WarrenS.BrandeisL. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4, 193–355.
23.
Washington v. Glas, No. 71514–9, 71571–8 (Washington State Supreme Court September 19, 2002).
