Focus groups help researchers obtain rich, experiential data in order to increase our sociological and psychological understanding of human interactions. In this study, I used qualitative data obtained from two focus groups, comprising 13 participants from the Ghanaian community, to understand Ghanaian immigrants’ personal experiences with and perceptions of the police in the United States. The rise in immigration from sub-Saharan Africa means that these immigrants’ views of and experiences with the police will become increasingly important to successful policing in local communities across the United States. The results of this study point to the need for U.S. police to employ procedural justice and distributive justice in their dealings with Ghanaian immigrants. These immigrants also believe that both their skin color and foreign accent pose a disadvantage when dealing with police. By addressing these concerns, the U.S. police would gain the trust and cooperation of the Ghanaian immigrant community. The policy implications of the findings are discussed.
AkinlabiO. M. (2015). Young people, procedural justice and police legitimacy in Nigeria. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy. doi:10.1080/10439463.2015.1077836
AsburyJ. (1995). Overview of focus group research. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 414–420.
6.
BabbieE. (2007). The practice of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
7.
BradfordB.HohlK.JacksonJ.MacQueenS. (2015). Obeying the rules of the road: Procedural justice, social identity, and normative compliance. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31, 171–191.
8.
ChiricosT.EschholzS. (2002). The racial and ethnic typification of crime and the criminal typification of race and ethnicity in local television news. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 39, 400–420.
9.
CrosnoeR.Lopez TurleyR. (2011). K-12 educational outcomes of immigrant youth. The Future of Children, 21, 129–152.
10.
DeversK. J.FrankelR. M. (2000). Study design in qualitative research—2: Sampling and data collection strategies. Education for Health, 13, 263–271.
11.
EberhardtJ.DaviesP. G.Purdie-VaughnsV. J.JohnsonS. L. (2006). Looking death-worthy: Perceived stereotypicality of black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17, 383–386.
12.
FaganJ.DaviesG. (2000). Street stops and broken windows: Terry, race and disorder in New York City. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 28, 457–504.
13.
GabbidonS. L.HigginsG. E.PotterH. (2011). Race, gender, and the perception of recently experiencing unfair treatment by the police: Exploratory results from an all-black sample. Criminal Justice Review, 36, 5–21.
14.
GauJ. M. (2014). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A test of measurement and structure. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 187–205.
15.
GauJ. M.BrunsonR. K. (2015). Procedural injustice, lost legitimacy, and self-help: Young males’ adaptations to perceived unfairness in urban policing tactics. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31, 132–150.
16.
GellerA. B.FaganJ. (2010). Pot as pretext: Marijuana, race and the new disorder in New York City street policing. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 7, 59–97.
Hollander-BlumoffR.TylerT. R. (2008). Procedural justice in negotiation: Procedural fairness, outcome acceptance, and integrative potential. Law & Social Inquiry, 33, 473–500.
19.
HuqA.TylerT. R.SchulhoferS. (2011a). Mechanisms for eliciting cooperation in counterterrorism policing: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8, 728–761.
20.
HuqA.TylerT. R.SchulhoferS. (2011b). Why does the public cooperate with law enforcement? The influence of the purposes and targets of policing. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 17, 419–450.
21.
IoimoR.TearsR. S.MeadowsL. A.BectonB.CharlesM. T. (2007). The police view of biased-based policing. Police Quarterly, 10, 270–287.
22.
JohnsonD.MaguireE. R.KuhnsJ. B. (2014). Public perceptions of the legitimacy of the law and legal authorities: Evidence from the Caribbean. Law and Society Review, 48, 947–978.
23.
MauerM. (1999). Race to incarcerate. New York, NY: New Press.
24.
MaxfieldM. G.BabbieE. (2006). Basics of research methods for criminal justice and criminology. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
25.
MazerolleL.AntrobusE.BennettS.TylerT. R. (2013). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 51, 33–64.
26.
MercerJ. (1995). Canadian cities and their immigrants: New realities. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 538, 169–184.
27.
MishlerE. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context & narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
MurphyK. (2003). Procedural justice and tax compliance. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38, 379–408.
29.
MurphyK. (2004). The role of trust in nurturing compliance: a study of accused tax avoiders. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 187–210.
30.
MurphyK.HindsL.FlemingJ. (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for police, Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy, 18, 136–155. doi:10.1080/10439460802008660
31.
MurphyK. (2009). Public satisfaction with police: The importance of procedural justice and police performance in police-citizen encounters. The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 42, 159–178.
32.
NapierJ. L.TylerT. R. (2008). Does moral conviction really override concerns about procedural justice?Social Justice Research, 21, 509–528.
33.
PryceD. K. (2016). Does procedural justice influence general satisfaction with police? A study from a hard-to-reach population of immigrants in the United States. Journal of Crime and Justice. doi:10.1080/0735648X.2016.1193820
34.
RussellK. K. (2002). The racial hoax as crime: The law as affirmation. In GabbidonS. L.GreeneH. T.YoungV. D. (Eds.), African American classics in criminology and criminal justice (pp. 349–376). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
SenjoS. R.DhunganaK. (2009). A field data examination of policy constructs related to fatigue conditions in law enforcement personnel. Policy Quarterly, 12, 123–136.
36.
SkitkaL.MullenE. (2002). Understanding judgments of fairness in a real-world political context: A test of the value protection model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1419–1429.
37.
StahlT.VermuntR.EllemersN. (2008). Reactions to outgroup authorities’ decisions: The role of expected bias, procedural fairness and outcome favorability. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11, 281–299.
38.
SunshineJ.TylerT. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37, 513–548.
39.
TankebeJ. (2009). Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: Does procedural fairness matter?Criminology, 47, 701–730.
40.
TankebeJ. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51, 103–135.
41.
TylerT. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 84–99.
42.
TylerT. R. (2005). Policing in Black and White: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8, 322–342.
43.
TylerT. R.SchulhoferS.HuqA. (2010). Legitimacy and deterrence effects in counterterrorism policing: A study of Muslim Americans. Law & Society Review, 44, 365–401.
44.
TylerT. R.JacksonJ. (2013). Future challenges in the study of legitimacy and criminal justice. In TankebeJ.LieblingA. (Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
VandiverD. M.DialK. C.WorleyR. M. (2008). A qualitative assessment of registered female sex offenders. Criminal Justice Review, 33, 177–198.
48.
WilsonC. PWilsonS. A.ThouM. (2015). Perceptions of African American Police officers on racial profiling in small agencies. Journal of Black Studies, 46, 482–505.
