Staff support of agency mission is an accepted axiom in organizational research. This analysis examined staff attitudes toward reentry preparation in a large prison system. Analysis examined whether local conditions at different prisons had an impact upon average views about the importance of reentry efforts. The study also investigated whether local conditions across prisons mediated differences between custody and treatment staff evaluations of reentry importance. Multilevel models demonstrated that average levels of reentry importance did vary across prisons, but the gap between custody and treatment staff evaluations was consistent across prisons.
AdamsK.FerrandinoJ. (2008). Managing mentally ill inmates in prisons. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 913–927.
2.
AntonioM. E.YoungJ. L.WingeardL. M. (2009a). Reinforcing positive behavior in a prisons: Whose responsibility is it?Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48, 53–66.
3.
AntonioM. E.YoungJ. L.WingeardL. M. (2009b). When actions and attitude count most: Assessing perceived level of responsibility and support for inmate treatment and rehabilitation programs among correctional employees. Prison Journal, 89, 363–382.
4.
ApplebaumK. A.HickeyJ. M.PackerP. (2001). The role of correctional officers in multi-disciplinary mental health care in prisons. Psychiatric Services, 52, 1343–1347.
5.
BonnerR.VandecreekL. D. (2006). Ethical decision making for correctional mental health providers. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 33, 542–564.
6.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A. (Ed.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2015). Corrections statistical analysis tool (CSAT)—Prisoners. Retrieved November 25, 2015, fromhttp://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=nps
8.
CampS. D. (1994). Assessing the effects of organizational commitment and job satisfaction on turnover: An event history approach. The Prison Journal, 74, 279–305.
9.
CampS. D.LanganN. P.PrussN. (2013). Research brief: PSCS scales of reentry and camaraderie. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Office of Research and Evaluation.
10.
ClemmerD. (1940). The prison community. Boston, MA: Christopher.
11.
CrawleyE. (2004). Doing prison work: The public and private lives of prison officers. Portland, OR: Willan.
12.
CullenF. T.LutzeF. E.LinkB. G.WolfeN. T. (1989). Correctional orientation of prison guards: Do officers support rehabilitation. Federal Probation, 53, 33–42.
13.
DvoskinJ. A.SpiersE. M. (2004). On the role of correctional officers in prison mental health. Psychiatric Quarterly, 75, 41–59.
14.
FarkasM. A. (1999). Correctional officer attitudes toward inmates and working with inmates in a ‘get tough’ era. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 495–506.
15.
FarnworthM.LeiberM. (1989). Strain theory revisited: Economic goals, educational means, and delinquency. American Sociological Review, 54, 263–274.
16.
FellnerJ. (2006). A corrections quandary: Mental illness and prison rules. Harvard Civil Rights—Civil Liberties Review, 41, 391–412.
17.
GaesG. G.KendigN. (2003). The skill sets and health care needs of released offenders. In TravisJ.WaulM. (Eds.), Prisoners once removed: The impact of incarceration and reentry on children, families, and communities (pp. 105–153). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
18.
HepburnJ. R. (1987). The prison control structure and its effects on work attitudes: The perceptions and attitudes of prison guards. Journal of Criminal Justice, 15, 49–64.
19.
HepburnJ. R.AlbonettiC. (1980). Role conflict in correctional institutions: An empirical examination of the treatment-custody dilemma among correctional staff. Criminology, 17, 445–459.
20.
JacobsJ. B. (1977). Stateville: The penitentiary in mass society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21.
JeglicE. L.KnightK.JonhnstonJ. S.TrickeyM. (2005). The function of self-harm behavior in a forensic population. International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 49, 131–142.
22.
JurikN. C. (1985). Individual and organizational determinants of correctional officer attitudes toward inmates. Criminology, 23, 523–540. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1985.tb00352.x
23.
KerceE. W.MagnussonP.RudolphA. (1994). The attitudes of navy correctional staff members: What they think about confinees and their jobs. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
24.
LambertE. G.AltheimerI.HoganN. L.Barton-BellessaS. M. (2011). Correlates of correctional orientation in a treatment-oriented prison a partial test of person—Environment fit theory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 453–470.
25.
LambertE. G.Barton-BellessaS. M.HoganN. L. (2014). The association between correctional orientation and organizational citizenship behaviors among correctional staff. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 953–974.
26.
LambertE. G.HoganN. (2009). Exploring the predictors of treatment views of private correctional staff: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48, 504–528.
27.
LambertE. G.HoganN. L.CheesemanK.Barton-BellessaS. M. (2013). The relationship between job stressors and job involvement among correctional staff: A test of the job strain model. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 52, 19–38. doi:10.1111/hojo.12002
28.
LambertE. G.KimB.HoganN. L.KelleyT. M.GarlandB. (2014). Why I am here matters: The effects of continuance and affective commitment on the organizational citizenship of private prison staff. Security Journal. doi:10.1057/sj.2014.29
29.
LambertE. G.Paoline IiiE. A.HoganN. L.BakerD. N. (2007). Gender similarities and differences in correctional staff work attitudes and perceptions of the work environment. Western Criminology Review, 8, 16–31.
30.
LarivièreM. (2001). Antecedents and outcomes of correctional officer attitudes towards federal inmates: An exploration of person-organization fit. Doctoral Thesis, National Archives of Canada. Carleton UniversityOttawa, ON.
31.
LermanA. E.PageJ. (2012). The state of the job: An embedded work role perspective on prison officer attitudes. Punishment & Society, 14, 503–529.
32.
LinA. C. (2000). Reform in the making: The implementation of social policy in prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
LindquistC.WillisonJ. B.RossmanS.WaltersJ. H.LattimoreP. K. (2015). Second chance act adult offender reentry demonstration programs: Implementation challenges and lessons learned. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
34.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
35.
MackeyD.DourtrightK. (2000). Assessing punitiveness among college students: A comparison of criminal justice majors with other majors. The Justice Professional, 12, 423–441.
36.
MaximP. (1976). Treatment-custody staff conflicts in correctional institutions: A reanalysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology & Corrections, 18, 379–386.
37.
McLarenD. (1973). Cons, hacks and educated screws—The prison politics of discipline and rehabilitation. Canadian Journal of Criminology & Corrections, 15, 25–38.
38.
MollemanT.LeeuwF. L. (2012). The influence of prison staff on inmate conditions: A multilevel approach to staff and inmate surveys. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 18, 217–233.
39.
PogrebinM. (1978). Role conflict among correctional officers in treatment oriented correctional institutions. International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 22, 149–155.
40.
Scott RonaldJ. (1977). Treatment-custody role conflict in community based correctional workers: Causes & effects. Palo Alto, CA: R and E Research Associates.
41.
StataCorp. (2013). Stata statistical software: Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
42.
SteadmanH. J.Mc CartyD. W.MorrisseyJ. P. (1986). Developing jail mental health services: Practices & principles. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services.
43.
YoungJ. L.AntonioM. E.WingeardL. M. (2009). How staff attitude and support for inmate treatment and rehabilitation differs by job category: An evaluation of findings from Pennsylvania’s Department of Corrections’ employee training curriculum ‘reinforcing positive behavior.’Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 435–441.
44.
ZimbardoP. G. (1973). On the ethics of intervention in human psychological research: With special reference to the Stanford prison experiment. Cognition, 2, 243–256.
