Despite low overall crime rates, physical and sexual attacks are not uncommon at many American residential universities and colleges based, in part, on a strong association between intoxication and crime risk. Drawing upon concepts from a routine activities perspective and using ordinal logistic regression, this study contextualizes the effects of students’ “party” routines on their risk of recurrent crime victimization while at college. Findings show that, for women, spending time at bars doubles their risks of repeat physical attack and unwanted sexual contact. For men, crime risk is better predicted by types of substances used. Specifically, alcohol and pharmaceutical drugs increase men’s risk of repeat physical attack, whereas marijuana decreases risk. Still, marijuana use is the only routine that increases risk of repeat rape for both women and men. Implications of findings for student safety and strategies for reducing recurrent victimization within a party context are discussed.
AbbeyA.McAuslanP.ZawackiT.ClintonA.BuckP. (2001). Attitudinal, experiential and situational predictors of sexual assault perpetration. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 764–807.
2.
AbbeyA.WegnerR.WoernerJ.PegramS. E.PierceJ. (2014). Review of survey and experimental research that examine the relationship between alcohol consumption and men’s sexual aggression perpetration. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 15, 265–282.
3.
AgnewR. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
4.
AgrestiA. (2012). Categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
5.
AndersonB. M.RizzoM.BlockR. I.PearlsonG. D.O’LearyD. S. (2010). Sex, drugs and cognition: Effects of marijuana. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 42, 413–424.
6.
ArmstrongE. A.HamiltonL.SweeneyB. (2006). Sexual assault on campus: A multilevel, integrative approach to party rape. Social Problems, 53, 483–499.
7.
ArmstrongE. A.HamiltonL. T. (2013). Paying for the party: How college maintains inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BennetM. E.MillerJ. H.WoodallG. W. (1999). Drinking, binge drinking, and other drug use among Southwestern undergraduates: Three-year trends. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 25, 331–350.
9.
BleeckerE.MurnenS. K. (2005). Fraternity membership, the display of degrading sexual images of women, and rape myth acceptance. Sex Roles, 53, 487–493.
10.
BrowerA. M.CarrollL. (2007). Spatial and temporal aspects of alcohol-related crime in a college town. Journal of American College Health, 55, 267–275.
11.
BuddieA. M.ParksK. A. (2003). The role of the bar context and social behaviors on women’s risk for aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 1378–1393.
12.
CohenL. E.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–607.
13.
CookC.HealthF.ThompsonR. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web-or internet based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 821–836.
14.
CowleyA. D. (2014). “Let’s get drunk and have sex”: The complex relationship of alcohol, gender and sexual victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 1258–1278.
15.
DaigleL. E.FisherB. S.CullenF. T. (2008). The violent and sexual victimization of college women: Is repeat victimization a problem?Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1296–1313.
16.
DowdallG. W. (2007). The role of alcohol abuse in college student victimization. In FisherB. S.SloanJ. T.III (Eds.), Campus crime: Legal, social and policy perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 167–187). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
17.
FelsonR. B.BurchfieldK. B. (2004). Alcohol and the risk of physical and sexual assault victimization. Criminology, 42, 837–859.
18.
FinkelhorD.AsdigianN. L. (1996). Risks Factors for youth victimization: Beyond a lifestyle/routine activities theory approach. Violence and Victims, 11, 3–19.
19.
FirthD. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80, 27–38.
20.
FisherB. S.DaigleL. E.CullenF. T. (2010). What distinguishes single from recurrent sexual victims? The role of lifestyle-routine activities and first incident characteristics. Justice Quarterly, 27, 102–129.
21.
FisherB. S.WilkesA. R. P. (2003). A tale of two ivory towers: A comparative analysis of victimization rates and risks between university students in the US and England. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 526–544.
22.
FlowersR. B. (2009). College crime: A statistical study of offense on American campuses. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.
23.
HarfordT. C.WechslerH.MuthénB. O. (2003). Alcohol-related aggression and drinking at off-campus parties and bars: A national study of current drinkers in college. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 704–711.
24.
HingsonR. W.HeerenT.ZakocsR. C.KopsteinA. (2002). Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among US college students ages 18-24. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63, 136–144.
25.
JohnsonV. E.AlbertJ. H. (1999). Ordinal data modeling. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
26.
KarmenA. (2013). Crime victims: An introduction to victimology (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
27.
KimmelM. (2008). Guyland: The perilous world where boys become men. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
28.
McNeeleyS. (2015). Lifestyle-routine activities and crime events. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 3, 30–52.
29.
MietheT. D.MeierR. F. (1990). Opportunity, choice and criminal victimization: A test of a theoretical model. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 27, 243–266.
30.
MinowJ. C.EinolfC. J. (2009). Sorority participation and sexual assault risk. Violence Against Women, 15, 835–851.
31.
Mohler-KuoM.LeeJ. E.WechslerH. (2003). Trends in marijuana and other illicit drug use among college students: Results from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College alcohol study surveys: 1993-2001. Journal of American College Health, 52, 17–24.
32.
MosherC. J.AkinsS. (2007). Drugs and drug policy: The control of consciousness alteration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
MurnenS. K.KohlmanM. H. (2007). Athletic participation, fraternity membership, and sexual aggression among college men: A meta-analytic review. Sex Roles, 57, 145–157.
34.
MustaineE. E.TewksburyR. (2004). Profiling the druggie lifestyle: Characteristics related to southern college students’ use of illicit drugs. Sociological Spectrum, 24, 157–189.
35.
MustaineE. E.TewksburyR. (2007). Routine activities and criminal victimization of students: Lifestyle and related factors. In FisherB. S.SloanJ. T.III (Eds.), Campus crime: Legal, social and policy perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 147–166). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
36.
O’GradyK. E.ArriaA. M.FitzellaD. M.WishE. D. (2008). Heavy drinking and polydrug use among college students. Journal of Drug Issues, 38, 445–466.
37.
PinoN. W.Johnson-JohnsA. M. (2009). College women and the occurrence of unwanted sexual advances in public drinking settings. Social Science Journal, 46, 252–267.
38.
PoppA. M.PegueroA. A. (2011). Routines activities and victimization at school: The significance of gender. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 2413–2436.
39.
RobinsonM. B.RohS. (2007). Crime on campus: Spatial aspects of campus crime at regional comprehensive university. In FisherB. S.SloanJ. T.III (Eds.), Campus crime: Legal, social and policy perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 231–258). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
40.
SeamanB. (2005). Binge: What your college student won’t tell you. Campus life in an age of disconnection and excess. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
41.
ShillingtonA. M.ClappJ. D. (2006). Heavy alcohol use compared to alchol and marijuana use: Do college students experience a difference in substance use problems?Journal of Drug Education, 36, 91–103.
42.
ShoreyR. C.McNultyJ. K.MooreT. M.StuartG. L. (2016). Being the victim of violence during a date predicts next-day cannabis use among female college students. Addiction, 111, 492–498.
43.
TewksburyR.HigginsG. E.MustaineE. E. (2008). Binge drinking among college athletes and non-athletes. Deviant Behavior, 29, 275–293.
44.
TewksburyR.MustaineE. E. (2003). College students’ lifestyles and self-protective behaviors: Further considerations of the guardianship concept in routine activity theory. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 302–327.
45.
TewksburyR.PedroD. (2003). The role of alcohol in victimization. In MoriartyL. J. (Ed.), Controversies in victimology (pp. 25–42). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
46.
TuranovicJ. J.PrattT. C. (2014). “Can’t stop, won’t stop”: Self-control, risky lifestyles, and repeat victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 29–56.
47.
Vander VenT. (2011). Getting Wasted: Why college students drink too much and party so hard. New York, NY: New York University Press.
48.
WechslerH.NelsonT. F. (2008). What we have learned from the Harvard School of Public Health college alcohol study: Focusing attention on college student alcohol consumption and the environmental conditions that promote it. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 69, 481–490.
49.
WechslerH.WuethrichB. (2002). Dying to drink: Confronting binge drinking on college campuses. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
50.
WeissK. G. (2013). Party school: Crime, campus and community. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
51.
WeissK. G.DilksL. M. (2015). Marijuana, gender and health-related harms: Disentangling marijuana’s contribution to risk within a college “party” context. Sociological Spectrum, 35, 254–270.
52.
WellsS.GrahamK.TremblayP. (2007). Beliefs, attitudes and male-to-male barroom aggression: Development of a theoretical predictive mode. Addiction Research and Theory, 15, 575–586.
53.
WilcoxP.TillyerM. S.FisherB. S. (2009). Gendered opportunity? School based adolescent victimization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 46, 245–269.
