Beckett and Sasson argue that the wars on crime and drugs of the 1980s and 1990s were part of an elite-engineered hegemonic strategy aimed at replacing the welfare state with the security state. As the welfare state came under attack, a new hegemonic strategy emerged that attacked welfare policies and promoted “tough on crime” policies. Yet, Beckett and Sasson note that for the new hegemonic strategy to be successful, it must be rooted in the experiences and cultural beliefs of the general population. We investigate the possibility of an elite-engineered effort to build support for tough on crime policies by conducting a time series analysis using General Social Survey data and statements by presidents in State of the Union addresses from 1972 to 2010. Specifically, we predict aggregate levels of fear of crime and support for welfare spending with presidential mentions of “crime” and “welfare” in State of the Union addresses. Our results indicate that fear increases when presidents discuss crime and welfare in the State of the Union. In addition, fear of crime is inversely related to supporting welfare spending. These relationships hold even after controlling for crime rates. Our findings offer support for Beckett and Sasson’s argument.
BaumgartnerF.JonesB. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
BeckettK. (1994). Setting the public agenda: ‘Street crime’ and drug use in American politics. Social Problems, 41, 425–447.
3.
BeckettK. (1999). Making crime pay: Law and order in contemporary American politics. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
4.
BeckettK.SassonT. (2000). The War on Crime as hegemonic strategy: A neo-Marxian theory of the new punitiveness in U.S. criminal justice policy. In SimpsonS. (Ed.), Of crime and criminality: The use of theory in everyday life (pp. 61–84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
5.
BonnS. (2010). Mass deception: Moral panic and the US war on Iraq. New Brunswick, Canada: Rutgers University Press.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2013). AFDC/TANF: Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2013 for AFDC/TANF, Family and Other Support Assistance. Internal Revenue Service Statistics of Income, various years; CPI deflator.
8.
BursteinP. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 29–40.
9.
CaplowT.SimonJ. (1999). Understanding prison policy and population trends. Crime and Justice, 26, 63–120.
10.
CarsonE. A.GolinelliD. (2013). Prisoners in 2012: Trends in admissions and releases, 1991-2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics.
11.
CohenJ. E. (1995). Presidential rhetoric and the public agenda. American Journal of Politics, 39, 87–107.
12.
ConoverP. J.SigelmanL. (1982). Presidential influence and public opinion: The case of the Iranian hostage crisis. Social Science Quarterly, 63, 249–264.
13.
CullenF. T.FisherB. S.ApplegateB. K. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. Crime and Justice, 1–79.
14.
De DonderL.VertéD.MesselisE. (2005). Fear of crime and elderly people: Key factors that determine fear of crime among elderly people in West Flanders. AgeingInternational, 30, 363–376.
15.
DillonW.GoldsteinM. (1984). Multivariate analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Wiley.
16.
EdwardsG. C.IIIWoodB. D. (1999). Who influences whom? The president, congress, and the media. American Political Science Review, 93, 327–344.
17.
ElwoodW. N. (1994). Rhetoric in the war on drugs: The triumphs and tragedies of public relations. Westport, CT: Praeger.
18.
FarrallS.JacksonJ.GrayE. (2009). Social order and the fear of crime in contemporary Times. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Studies in Criminology.
19.
FitchJ. S. (1985). The garrison state in America: A content analysis of trends in the expectation of violence. Journal of Peace Research, 22, 31–45.
20.
FoxK. A.NoblesM. R.PiqueroA. R. (2009). Gender, crime victimization and fear of crime. Security Journal, 22, 24–39.
21.
FrostN. (2010). Beyond public opinion polls: punitive public sentiment and criminal justice policy. Sociology Compass, 4, 156–168.
22.
GarlandD. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
GirlingE.LoaderI.SparksR. (2000). Crime and social change in middle England: Questions of order in an English town. New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
GonzenbachW. J. (1992). A time-series analysis of the drug issue, 1985-1990: The press, the president, and public opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4, 126–147.
25.
GonzenbachW. J. (1996). The media, the president, and public opinion: A longitudinal analysis of the drug issue, 1984–1991. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
GottschalkM. (2006). The prisons and the gallows: The politics of mass incarceration in America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
GramsciA. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York, NY: International Publishers.
28.
GrayE.JacksonJ.FarrallS. (2011). Feelings and functions in the fear of crime. British Journal of Criminology, 51, 75–94.
29.
HawdonJ. (1996). Cycles of deviance: Structural change, moral boundaries, and drug use, 1880-1990. Sociological Spectrum, 16, 183–207.
30.
HawdonJ. (2001). The role of presidential rhetoric in the creation of a moral panic: Reagan, Bush, and the war on drugs. Deviant Behavior, 22, 419–445.
31.
HawdonJ. (2005). Drugs and alcohol consumption as a function of social structure: A cross-cultural sociology. Lewistown, NY: Mellen Press.
32.
HillJ.OliverW. M.MarionN. E. (2010). ‘Shaping history’’ or ‘riding the wave’: President Bush’s influence on the public opinion of crime, terrorism, and homeland security. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 896–902.
33.
HummelsheimD.HirtenlehnerH.JacksonJ.OberwittlerD. (2011). Social insecurities and fear of crime: A cross-national study on the impact of welfare state policies on crime-related anxieties. European sociological review, 27, 327–345.
34.
IyengarS.KinderD. R. (2010). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
35.
JohnstonL. D.O'MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.SchulenbergJ. E. (2010). Monitoring the Future: National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2009. Volume I: Secondary School Students(NIH Publication No. 10-7584). Bethesda, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
36.
KernellS. (2007). Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership (4th ed). Washington, DC: C.Q. Press.
37.
KieveA. (1994). The modern presidency and crisis rhetoric. Westport, CT.: Praeger.
38.
KiousisS.StrömbäckJ. (2010). The White House and public relations: Examining the linkages between presidential communications and public opinion. Public Relations Review, 36, 7–14.
39.
KramerR.MichalowskiR. (2006). The invasion of Iraq. In MichalowskiR.KramerR. (Eds.), State corporate crime: Wrongdoing at the intersection of business and government (pp. 199–214). New Brunswick, Canada: Rutgers University Press.
40.
LasswellH. (1941). The garrison state. American Journal of Sociology, 46, 455–468.
41.
LinM.-J. (2008). Does unemployment increase crime? Evidence from U.S. data 1974–2000. Journal of Human Resources, 43, 413–436.
42.
LiptakA. (April 23, 2008). Inmate count in US dwarfs other nations. New York Times, 23.
43.
LiskaA. E.WarnerB. D. (1991). Functions of crime: A paradoxical process. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 1441–1463.
44.
MarionN. E. (1992). Presidential agenda setting in crime control. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 6, 159–184.
45.
McCombsM. (2013). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity.
46.
MeschG. S. (2000). Perceptions of risk, lifestyle activities, and fear of crime. Deviant Behavior, 21, 47–62.
47.
MichalowskiR.KramerR. (2006). Enron-era economics versus economic democracy. In MichalowskiR.KramerR. (Eds.), State-corporate crime: Wrongdoing at the intersection of business and government (pp. 172—185). New Brunswick, Canada: Rutgers University Press.
48.
NixonR. (1974). Address on the state of the union delivered before a joint session of the congress. PetersG.WoolleyJ. T. (Eds.), The American Presidency Project. Retrieved January 30, 1974 fromhttp://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=4327
49.
OliverW. M. (1998). Presidential rhetoric on crime and public opinion. Criminal Justice Review, 23, 139–160.
50.
OliverW. M. (2002). The pied piper of crime in America: An analysis of the presidents’ and public’s agenda on crime. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13, 139–155.
51.
OliverW. M. (2003). The law and order presidency. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
52.
OliverW. M.HillJ.MarionN. (2011). When the president speaks: An analysis of presidential influence over public opinion concerning the war on drugs. Criminal Justice Review, 36, 456–469.
53.
ReaganR. (1982). Address before a joint session of the congress reporting on the state of the Union. In PetersG.WoolleyJ. T. (Eds.), The American Presidency Project. Retrieved January 26, 1982, fromhttp://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=42687
54.
RobertsJ. V.StalansL. (1997). Public opinion, crime, and criminal justice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
55.
RotheD. (2006). Iraq and Halliburton. In MichalowskiR.KramerR. (Eds.), State-corporate crime: Wrongdoing at the intersection of business and government (pp. 215–238). New Brunswick, Canada: Rutgers University Press.
56.
SemetkoH. A.ValkenburgP. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of communication, 50, 93–109.
57.
SkoganW.MaxfieldM. (1981). Coping with crime: Individual and neighborhood reactions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
58.
TaylorI.EvansK.FraserP. (1996). A tale of two cities: Global change, local feeling and everyday life in the north of England. London, England: Routledge.
59.
TonryM. (1999). Why are US incarceration rates so high?Crime & Delinquency, 45, 419–437.
WacquantL. (2009a). Prisons of poverty. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
62.
WacquantL. (2009b). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
63.
WacquantL. (2010). Crafting the neoliberal state: Workfare, prisonfare and social insecurity. Sociological Forum, 25, 197–220.
64.
WacquantL. (2011). Deadly symbiosis: Race and the rise of the penal state. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
65.
WattenbergM. (2004). The changing presidential media environment. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34, 557–572.
66.
YoungG.PerkinsW. (2005). Presidential rhetoric, the public agenda, and the end of presidential television’s golden age. Journal of Politics, 67, 1190–1205.
