Among scholars, there is a discussion regarding whether types of places, or facilities, function as crime generators or whether the association between some categories of facilities and higher rates of offending is the result of a small proportion of all facilities within a given category, or problem places. This study seeks to further inform this debate by exploring whether policy changes that alter the social functioning of a category of facilities, specifically bars and taverns, modifies the spatial association with crime. Using routine activities theory as a framework, this study builds on previous research by exploring the association between alcohol-serving establishments and violent crimes, specifically assaults, following the implementation of a smoke-free law. Using data from a pair of adjoining communities in Iowa, findings indicate the frequency of reported assaults on blocks with bars as well as on adjoining blocks declined following the implementation of a law prohibiting smoking tobacco products within bars and taverns. Implications for policies and future research are discussed.
AdhikariB.KahendeJ.MalarcherA.PechacekT.TongV. (2008). Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 2000—2004. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 57, 1226–1228.
2.
AnselinL. (2004). GeoDa 0.9.5-i Release Notes. Urbana: Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
3.
AnselinL.BeraA. (1998). Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In UllahA.GilesD. E. (Eds.), Handbook of applied economic statistics (pp. 237–289). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
4.
AnselinL.CohenJ.CookD.GorrW.TitaG. (2000). Spatial analysis of crime. In DuffeeD. (Ed.), Measurement and analysis of crime and justice (pp. 213–262). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Justice.
5.
BlockR. L.BlockC. R. (1995). Space, place and crime: Hot spots areas and hot places of liquor-related crime. In EckJ.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Crime and place (pp. 145–183). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
6.
BrantinghamP.BrantinghamP. (1995). Criminality of place: Crime generators and crime attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3, 1–26.
7.
BriggsS.OpsalT. (2012). The influence of victim ethnicity on arrest in violent crimes. Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law and Society, 25, 177–190.
8.
BrittH.CarlinB.ToomeyT.WagenaarA. (2005). Neighborhood level spatial analysis of the relationship between alcohol outlet density and criminal violence. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 12, 411–426.
9.
CohenL.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends. American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.
10.
CollinsN. M.ShiQ.ForsterJ. L.EricksonD. J.ToomeyT. L. (2010). Effects of clean indoor air laws on bar and restaurant revenue in Minnesota cities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39, S10–S15.
11.
CowlingD. W.BondP. (2005). Smoke-free laws and bar revenues in California-the last call. Health Economics, 14, 1273–1281.
12.
Department of Revenue, Tax Research and Fiscal Analysis Section. (2007). Iowa Retail Sales & Use Tax Report. Des Moines: State of Iowa.
13.
Department of Revenue, Tax Research and Fiscal Analysis Section. (2009). Iowa Retail Sales & Use Tax Report. Des Moines: State of Iowa.
14.
EckJ. E.ClarkeR. V.GueretteR. T. (2007). Risky facilities: Crime concentrations in homogeneous sets of establishments and facilities. Crime Prevention Studies, 21, 225–264.
15.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2004). Uniform crime reporting handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
16.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2005). Crime in the United States, 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
17.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2008). Crime in the United States, 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
18.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2009). Crime in the United States, 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
19.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2010). Crime in the United States, 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
20.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2011). Crime in the United States, 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
21.
FelsonM. (1995). Those who discourage crime. In EckJ. E.WeisburdD. (Eds.), Crime and place (pp. 53–66). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
22.
FelsonR. B.BurchfieldK. B. (2004). Alcohol and the risk of physical and sexual assault victimization. Criminology, 42, 837–859.
23.
FelsonR. B.StaffJ. (2010). The effects of alcohol intoxication on violent versus other offending. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 1343–1360.
24.
FrisbieD. W.FishbineG.HintzR.JoelsonM.NutterJ. B. (1977). Crime in Minneapolis: Proposals for prevention. St. Paul, MN: Community Crime Prevention Project, Governor’s Commission on Crime Prevention and Control.
25.
GormanD.SpeerP.GruenwaldP.LabouvieE. (2001). Spatial dynamics of alcohol availability, neighborhood structure and violent crime. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 628–636.
26.
GruenwaldP. J.FreisthlerB.RemerL.LaScalaE. A.TrenoA. (2006). Ecological models of alcohol outlets and violent assaults: Crime potentials and geospatial analysis. Addiction, 101, 666–677.
27.
HeinzA. J.BeckA.Meyer-LindenbergA.SterzerP.HeinzA. (2011). Cognitive and neurobiological mechanisms of alcohol-related aggression. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 12, 400–413.
28.
HindelangM. J.GottfredsonM. R.GarofaloJ. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
29.
HomelR.ClarkJ. (1995). The prediction and prevention of violence in pubs and clubs. In ClarkR. (Ed.), Crime prevention studies (pp. 1–46). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
30.
HomelR.TomsenS.ThommenyJ. (1992). Public drinking and violence: Not just an alcohol problem. Journal of Drug Issues, 22, 679–697.
31.
JonesR.HollJ. (2006, April 14). New Jersey joins 10 states in banning indoor smoking. New York Times, p. B6.
32.
KlingerD. A. (1997). Negotiating order in patrol work: An ecological theory of police response to deviance. Criminology, 35, 277–306.
33.
KubrinC. E.SquiresG. D.GravesS. M.OuseyG. C. (2011). Does fringe banking exacerbate neighborhood crime rates?Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 435–466.
34.
LivingstonM. (2008). Alcohol outlet density and assault: A spatial analysis. Addiction, 103, 619–628.
35.
McClellandG. M.TeplinL. A. (2001). Alcohol intoxication and violent crime: Implications for public health policy. The American Journal on Addictions, 10, 70–85.
36.
MertonR. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1, 894–904.
37.
MooreR.AnnechinoR.LeeJ. (2009). Unintended consequences of smoke-free bar policies for low-SES women in three California counties. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37, 138–143.
38.
MurrayR. K.RoncekD. W. (2008). Measuring diffusion of assaults around bars through radius and adjacency techniques. Criminal Justice Review, 33, 199–220.
39.
NielsenA.MartinezR. (2003). Reassessing the alcohol-violence linkage: Results from a multiethnic city. Justice Quarterly, 20, 445–469.
40.
PetersonR.KrivoL.HarrisM. (2000). Disadvantage and neighborhood violent crime: Do local institutions matter?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37, 31–63.
41.
Polk City Directories. (2007a). Cedar Falls, IA. Livonia, MI: Polk City Directories.
42.
Polk City Directory. (2007b). Waterloo, IA. Livonia, MI: Polk City Directories.
43.
Polk City Directory. (2009a). Cedar Falls, IA. Livonia, MI: Polk City Directories.
44.
Polk City Directory. (2009b). Waterloo, IA. Livonia, MI: Polk City Directories.
45.
RandM.RobinsonJ. (2011). Criminal victimization in the United States, 2008—Statistical tables. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
46.
RoncekD.BellR. (1981). Bars, blocks, and crimes. Journal of Environmental Systems, 11, 35–47.
47.
RoncekD.FaggianiD. (1985). High schools and crime. The Sociological Quarterly, 26, 491–505.
48.
RoncekD.MaierP. (1991). Bars, blocks, and crimes revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of “hot spots.”Criminology, 29, 725–753.
49.
RoomR. (2004). Smoking and drinking as complementary behaviours. Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, 58, 111–115.
50.
RottonJ.CohnE. G. (2004). Outdoor temperature, climate control, and criminal assault: The spatial and temporal ecology of violence. Environment & Behavior, 36, 276–306.
51.
SampsonR. J.RaudenbushS. W.EarlsF. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
52.
ScolloM.LalA.HylandA.GlantzS. (2003). Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry. Tobacco Control, 12, 13–20.
53.
ShawC. R.McKayH. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency in urban areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54.
ShermanL.GartinP.BuergerM. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27–55.
55.
SmirnovO.AnselinL. (2001). Fast maximum likelihood estimation of very large spatial autoregressive models: A characteristic polynomial approach. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 35, 301–319.
56.
Smokefree Air Act, Iowa Code §142D. (2008).
57.
SpeerP.GormanD.LabouvieE.OntkushM. (1998). Violent crime and alcohol availability: Relationships in an urban community. Journal of Public Health Policy, 19, 303–318.
58.
TownsleyM. (2009). Spatial aurocorrelation and impacts on criminology. Geographical Analysis, 41, 452–461.
59.
TrumanJ. (2011). Criminal victimization, 2010. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
60.
TynanM.BabbS.MacNeilA.GriffinM. (2011). State smoke-free laws for worksites, restaurants, and bars—United States, 2000–2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 60, 472–475.
VaranoS.SchaferJ.CancinoJ.SwattM. (2009). Constructing crime: Neighborhood characteristics and police recording behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 553–563.
63.
WeisburdD.HinkleJ.FamegaC.ReadyJ. (2011). The possible “backfire” effects of hot spots policing: An experimental assessment of impacts on legitimacy, fear and collective efficacy. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 297–320.
64.
WilcoxP.EckJ. E. (2011). Criminology of the unpopular: Implications for policy aimed at payday lending facilities. Criminology & Public Policy, 10, 473–482.
