Research on turnover in the correctional workplace has predominately focused on investigating the relationship between job satisfaction and turnover intent among prison staff. In an effort to broaden that level of inquiry to encompass the jail workforce, this study analyzes data from a national survey of 1,924 line-level jail staff to assess the impact of both work-related variables and personal characteristics on the intention of employees to resign. Although not randomly generated, respondents represent 46 states and are generally reflective of what is known about composition of the national line officer jail workforce in terms of demographics. Descriptive results indicate that the majority of jail officers are satisfied with their jobs and have no intention of quitting. Further logistic regression modeling confirms related literature indicating that the most influential variables are dynamic factors such as job satisfaction and work environment, rather than the static variables associated with individual employee characteristics, such as gender, age, or race. Since the environmental variables investigated are amenable to change, it would appear that, with greater insights into these dynamic precursors of thoughts about quitting, jail administrators can develop strategic initiatives targeted toward proactively reducing the fiscal cost and intangible impact of voluntary turnover.
American Correctional Association and Workforce Associates, Inc. (2004). A 21st century workforce for America’s correctional profession part one. Alexandria, VA: American Correctional Association.
2.
AuerbachS. M.QuickB. G.PeggP. O. (2003). General job stress and job-specific stress in juvenile correctional officers. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 25–36.
3.
BlauJ. R.LightS.ChamlinM. B. (1986). Individual and contextual effects on stress and job satisfaction: A study of prison staff. Work and Occupations, 13, 131–156.
4.
BynumR. (2006). Corrections as a profession: Parity issues in1 corrections. American Jails, 20, 81–86.
5.
ByrdT.CochranJ.SilvermanI.BlountW. (2000). Behind bars: An assessment of the effects of job satisfaction, job-related stress, and anxiety of jail employees’ inclinations to quit. Journal of Crime and Criminal Justice, 23, 69−89.
6.
CampS. (1994). Assessing the effects of organizational commitment and job satisfaction on turnover: An event history approach. The Prison Journal, 74, 279–305.
7.
CampS.SteigerT. (1995). Gender and racial differences in perceptions of career opportunities and the work environment in a traditionally white, male occupation. In JacksonN. (Ed.), Contemporary issues in criminal justice: Shaping tomorrow’s system (pp. 177–190). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
8.
CarlsonJ. R.AnsonR. H.ThomasG. (2003). Correctional officer burnout and stress: Does gender matter?The Prison Journal, 83, 277–288.
9.
CastleT. L. (2008). Satisfied in the jail? Exploring the predictors of job satisfaction among jail officers. Criminal Justice Review, 33, 48–63.
10.
CastleT. L.MartinJ. S. (2006). Occupational hazard: Predictors of stress among jail correctional officers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 65–80.
11.
ClemC.KrauthB.WengerP. (2000). Recruitment, hiring, and retention: Current practices in U.S. jails. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections, US Department of Justice.
12.
CottonJ. L.TuttleJ. M. (1986). Employee turnover: A meta-analysis and review with implications for research. Academy of Management Review, 11, 55–70.
13.
CrannyC.SmithP.StoneE. (1992). Job satisfaction: How people feel about their jobs and how it affects their performance. New York, NY: Lexington.
14.
CullenF. T.LinkB. GWolfeN. T.FrankJ. (1985). The social dimensions of correctional officer stress. Justice Quarterly, 2, 505–533.
15.
DalessioA.SilvermanW.SchuckJ. (1986). Paths to turnover: A re-analysis and review of existing data on the Mobley, Horner, and Hollingsworth’s turnover model. Human Relations, 39, 245–264.
16.
DennisG. (1998). Here today, gone tomorrow: How management style affects job satisfaction and, in turn, employee turnover. Corrections Today, 60, 96–102.
17.
GarlandB. E.McCartyW. PZhaoR. (2009). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment in prisons: An examination of psychological staff, teachers, and unit management staff. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 163–183.
18.
GibbonsJ. J.KatzenbachN. D. B. (June, 2006). Confronting confinement: A report of the commission on safety and abuse in America’s prisons. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
19.
GrossiE. L.BergB. L. (1991). Stress and job dissatisfaction among correctional officers: An unexpected finding. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 35, 73–81.
20.
GriffinM. L. (2001). Job satisfaction among detention officers: Assessing the relative contribution of organizational climate variables. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 219–232.
21.
GriffinM. L.HoganN. L.LambertE. G.Tucker-GailK. A.BakerD. N. (2010). Job involvement, job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment and the burnout of correctional staff. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 239–255.
22.
HepburnJ. R.KnepperP. E. (1993). Correctional officers as human service workers: The effect on job satisfaction. Justice Quarterly, 10, 315–335.
23.
JacobsJ. B.GrearM. P.. (1977). Dropouts and rejects: An analysis of the prison guard’s revolving door. Criminal Justice Review, 2, 57–70.
24.
JurikN. C.HalembaG. J. (1984). Gender, working conditions, and the job satisfaction of women in a nontraditional occupation: Female correctional officers in men’s prisons. Sociological Quarterly, 25, 551–566.
25.
JurikN.HalembaG.MushenoM.BoyleB. (1987). Education attainment, job satisfaction, and the professionalism of correctional officers. Work and Occupations, 14, 106−125.
26.
JurikN.WinnR. (1987). Describing correctional security dropouts and rejects: An individual or organizational profile?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 5–25.
27.
KiekbuschR.PriceW.TheisJ. (2003). Turnover predictors: Causes of employee turnover in sheriff-operated jails. Criminal Justice Studies, 16, 67−76.
28.
KirkpatrickD. (1985). How to manage change effectively. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
KotterJ. P. (1999). What leaders really do. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Book.
30.
LambertE. (2001). To stay or quit: A review of the literature on correctional staff turnover. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 61–76.
31.
LambertE. C.HoganN.BartonS. (2002). Satisfied correctional staff: A review of the literature on the correlates of correctional staff job satisfaction. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 115–143.
32.
LambertE. G. (2004). The impact of job characteristics on correctional staff members. The Prison Journal, 84, 208–227.
33.
LambertE. (2006). I want to leave: A test of a model of turnover intent among correctional staff. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 2, 57–83.
34.
LambertE. G.HoganN. (2009). The importance of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in shaping turnover intent: A test of a causal model. Criminal Justice Review, 34, 96–118.
35.
LambertE. G.PaolineE. A. (2010). Take this job and shove it: An exploratory study of turnover intent among jail staff. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 139–148.
36.
LindquistC. A.WhiteheadJ. T. (1986). Burnout, job stress, and job satisfaction among southern correctional officers: Perceptions and causal factors. Journal of Offender Counseling, Service and Rehabilitation, 10, 5–26.
37.
LommelJ.LaymanM.RaleighD. (2004). Measuring, costing and reporting employee turnover. Paper presentation conducted at the Meeting of the 2004 Annual American Correctional Association, Congress of Corrections, Chicago, IL.
38.
MitchellO.MacKenzieD.StyveG.GoverA. (2000). The impact of individual, organizational, and voluntary turnover among juvenile correctional staff members. Justice Quarterly, 17, 333–357.
39.
MobleyW.GriffethR.HandH.MeglinoB. (1979). Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 493–522.
40.
MorganW. J. (2009). Correctional officer stress: A review of the literature, 1977–2007. American Jails, 23, 33–43.
41.
NinkC. (2010). Correctional officers: Strategies to improve retention. Centerville, UT: MTC Institute.
42.
O’HaraP. (2005). Why law enforcement organizations fail: Mapping the organizational fault lines in policing. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
43.
PriceJ. L. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames, IA: State University Press.
44.
PriceW.KiekbuschR.TheisJ. (2007). Causes of employee turnover in sheriff operated jails. Public Personnel Management, 36, 51–63.
45.
RobinsonD.PorporinoF.SimourdL. (1997). The influence of educational attainment on the attitudes and job performance of correctional officers. Crime and Delinquency, 43, 60–77.
46.
RogersR. (1991). The effects of educational level on correctional officer job satisfaction. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 123–37.
47.
SabolW. J.MintonT. D. (June, 2008). Jail inmates at midyear 2007. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
48.
SaylorW. G.WrightK. N. (1992). Status, longevity and perceptions of the work environment among federal prison employees. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 17, 133–160.
49.
ScheinE. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
50.
SchneiderB. (1975). Organizational climates: An essay. Personnel Psychology, 28, 447–479.
51.
Scott-HaywardC. S. (July, 2009). The fiscal crisis in corrections: Rethinking policies and practices. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice.
52.
SlateR. N.VogelR. E. (1997). Participative management and correctional personnel: A study of the perceived atmosphere for participation in correctional decision-making and its impact on employee stress and thoughts about quitting. Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 397–408.
53.
StephanJ. J. (August, 2001). Census of jails, 1999. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.
54.
StephanJ. J.WalshG. (December, 2011). Census of jail facilities, 2006. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.
55.
StinchcombJ. B. (2011). Corrections: Foundations for the future. New York, NY: Routledge.
56.
StinchcombJ. B.LeipL. A. (2010). Research notes: The national jail workforce survey—methodological challenges. Corrections Today, 72, 150–151.
StohrM.SelfR.LovrichN. (1992). Staff turnover in new generation jails: An investigation of its causes and preventions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 20, 455–478.
59.
TaxmanF. S.GordonJ. A. (2009). Do fairness and equity matter? An examination of organizational justice among correctional officers in adult prisons. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 695–711.
60.
TettR. P.MeyerJ. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytical findings. Personnel Psychology, 46, 259–293.
61.
TrevorC. O. (2001). Interactions among actual ease-of-movement determinants and job satisfaction in the prediction of voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 621–638.
62.
TiptonJ. (2002). Attitudes and perceptions of South Carolina’s juvenile correctional officers’ insight into the turnover epidemic. Journal of Crime and Justice, 25, 81–98.
63.
United States Department of Justice. (2012). Jail inmates at midyear 2011—statistical table 4(NCJ Publication No. 237961). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved fromhttp://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/jim11st.pdf
64.
YearwoodD. L. (September/October, 2003), Recruitment and retention issues in North Carolina, American Jails, 17, 9–14.
65.
ZajacG.Al-KazemiA. (1997). Reinventing government and redefining leadership, Public Productivity and Management Review, 20, 372–383.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
