Book Review: The Effect of Jurors’ Race on their Response to Scientific Evidence

Corbie-Smith G. Thomas S. B. St. George D. M. M . (2002). Distrust, race, and research. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 2458–2463.

Faigman, D. L., & Baglioni, A. J. (1988). Bayes’ Theorem in the trial process: instructing jurors on the value of statistical evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 1–17.

Gamble V. N. (1993). A legacy of distrust: African Americans and medical research. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 1993, 35–38.

Gamble V. N. (1997). Under the shadow of Tuskegee: African Americans and health care. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1773–1778.

Gauchat G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77, 167–187.

Jones j. (1993). Bad blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York, NY: Free Press.

Lempert R. (1998). Why do juries get a bum rap? Reflections on the work of Valerie Hans. DePaul Law Review, 48, 453–462.

Mastroianni A. C. (2006). Liability, regulation and policy in surgical innovation: The cutting edge of research and therapy. Health Matrix, 16, 351–442.

Reeves K. C. (2009). Prosecution function: False confessions and expert testimony. In Association American Bar (Ed.), The state of criminal justice (pp. 123–129). Chicago, IL: American Bar Association Press.

Tanaka E. S. (2005). Can you protect your DNA when your family does not? An analysis of familial DNA usage in criminal investigations. Quinnipiac Health Law Journal, 12, 115–139.

Thompson W. C. Schumann E. L. (1987). Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. Law and Human Behavior,11, 167–187.