In a 6-3 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether police officers are entitled to qualified immunity when their conduct does not violate any clearly established right of which a reasonable person would have known when requesting a search warrant. The Court found that the officers acted in a reasonable manner consistent with the Fourth Amendment requirements for securing a valid search warrant. The Court’s decision expanded the scope of probable cause and restricted liability of officers, holding that officers are entitled to qualified immunity when obtaining a valid search warrant.
del CarmenR.V. (2007). Criminal procedure: Law and practice (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Learning, Inc.
6.
Draperv.United States, 358 U.S. 307 (1959).
7.
Dumbrav.United States, 268 U.S. 435 (1925).
8.
Grohv.Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004).
9.
Harlowv.Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982).
10.
Illinoisv.Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983).
11.
Johnsonv.United States, 333 U.S. 10 (1948).
12.
LaurinJ. E. (2012). Messerschmdit and convergence in action: A reply to comments on trawling for herring. Columbia Law Review Sidebar, 112, 119–135.
13.
MacDonaldv.United States, 335 U.S. 451 (1948).
14.
Malleyv.Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986).
15.
Messerschmidtv.Millender, 565 U.S. 132 S. Ct. 1235 (2012).
16.
New Yorkv.P.J. Video, Inc., 475 U.S. 868 (1986).
17.
Pearsonv.Callahan, 555 U.S. 751 (2009).
18.
Saucierv.Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001).
19.
Stanfordv.Texas, 379 U.S. 476 (1985).
20.
Steelev.United States, 267 U.S. 498 (1925).
21.
StoneM. P.BergerM. J. (2009). The scope of federal qualified immunity in civil rights cases. Americans for Effective Law Enforcement Law Journal, 2, 501–508.
22.
United Statesv.Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984).
23.
United Statesv.Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102 (1965).
24.
WalkerJ. T.HemmensC. (2008). Legal guide for police: Constitutional issues (8th ed.). Newark, NJ: Matthew Bender and Company, Inc.
