Drawing on data from legal documents from 127 cases of men arrested for public sexual activity in known cruising locations (‘‘erotic oases’’), this article discusses the legal issue of selective prosecution. As shown, the decoy sting operations used to apprehend men engaging in same-sex sexual activities in public parks carry with them legal ramifications far beyond simply arresting and prosecuting offenders. A focus on the issues of discriminatory purpose and discriminatory effect is provided and discussion shows how each component of selective prosecution claims can (and did) influence the legal challenges of arrests of men engaging in same-sex sexual conduct in erotic oases.
Aveline, D.T. ( 1995). A typology of perceived HIV/AIDS risk-reduction strategies used by men who cruise other men for anonymous sex. The Journal of Sex Research, 32, 201-212.
2.
Brown, M.C. ( 2003). Thanks, buddy: The personal aspects of public sex sites. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado .
3.
California Penal Code, Disorderly conduct; Restrictions on probation, §647 (2004). California Penal Code, Indecent exposure, §314 (2004).
4.
California Penal Code, Sexual Battery, §243 (2004).
5.
Delph, E. ( 1978). The silent community: Public homosexual encounters. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
6.
Desroches, F. ( 1990). Tearoom trade: A research update. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 39-61.
7.
de Wit, J.B., de Vroome, E.M., Sandfort, T.G., & van Griensven, G.J. (1997). Homosexual encounters in different venues. International Journal of STD and AIDS , 8, 130-134.
8.
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. (2006). Rule16.
9.
Gray, J.K. ( 1988). The tearoom revisited: A study of impersonal homosexual encounters in a public setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
10.
Heller, R. ( 1997). Selective prosecution and the federalization of criminal law: The need for meaningful judicial review. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 145, 1309-1358.
11.
Hogan, S., & Hudson, L. ( 1998). The gay and lesbian encyclopedia. New York: Henry Holt.
12.
Hollister, J. ( 2004). Beyond the interaction membrane: Laud Humphrey’s tearoom tradeoff. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 24, 73-94.
13.
Hollister, J. ( 1999). A highway rest area as a socially reproducible site. In W. L. Leap (Ed.), Public sex/gay space (pp. 55-70). New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
Hooker, E. ( 1967). The homosexual community. In J. H. Gagnon & W. Simon (Eds.), Sexual Deviance (pp. 167-184). New York: Harper & Row.
15.
Humphreys, L. ( 1970). Tearoom trade: Impersonal sex in public places. Chicago: Aldine.
16.
Jampol, M.L. ( 1997). Goodbye to the defense of selective prosecution. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 87, 932-966.
17.
Karlan, P.S. ( 1998). Race, rights, and remedies in criminal adjudication. Michigan Law Review, 96, 2001-2030.
18.
Kyle, G.R. ( 1992). Public sex, public morality. The Journal of Sex Research, 29, 291-293.
19.
Larson, J. ( 2003). Unequal justice: The supreme court’s failure to curtail selective prosecution for the death penalty. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 93, 1009-1032.
20.
Leap, W.L. ( 1999). Sex in ‘private’ places: Gender, erotics and detachment in two urban locales. In W.L. Leap (Ed.), Public Sex/Gay Space (pp. 115-140). New York: Columbia University Press.
21.
Maynard, S. ( 1994). Through a hole in the lavatory wall: Homosexual subcultures, police surveillance, and the dialectics of discovery, Toronto, 1890-1930. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 5, 207-242.
22.
Oklobdzija, S. ( 2008, January 16). Police crackdown on gay cruising at parks . Sacramento Bee (online B1).
23.
Reece, M., & Dodge, B. ( 2003). Exploring indicators of sexual compulsivity among men who cruise for sex on campus. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity , 11, 87-113.
24.
Reece, M., & Dodge, B. ( 2004). Exploring indicators of sexual compulsivity among men who cruise for sex on campus. The Journal of Treatment & Prevention, 11, 87-113.
25.
Reiss, S.A. ( 1987). Prosecutorial intent in constitutional criminal procedure . University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 135, 1365-1477.
26.
Scully, L.D. ( 1997). Case Comment: Constitutional law-Defendants must make a credible showing of selective prosecution in order to obtain discovery-United States v. Armstrong, 116 S. Ct. 1480. 31Suffolk U.L. Rev553, 553+.
27.
Tewksbury, R. ( 1995). Adventures in the erotic oasis: Sex and danger in men’s same-sex, public, sexual encounters. Journal of Men’s Studies, 4, 9-24.
28.
Tewksbury, R. ( 1996). Cruising for sex in public places: The structure and language of men’s hidden, erotic worlds. Deviant Behavior , 17, 1-19.
29.
Tewksbury, R. ( 2002). Bathhouse intercourse: Structural and behavioral aspects of an erotic oasis. Deviant Behavior, 23, 75-112.
30.
Tewksbury, R. ( 2004). The intellectual legacy of Laud Humphreys: His impact on research and thinking about men’s public sexual encounters. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 24, 32-57.
31.
Tewksbury, R. ( 2008). Finding erotic oases: Locating the sites of men’s same-sex anonymous sexual encounters. Journal of Homosexuality , 5, 1-19.
32.
Tewksbury, R., & Polley, N.M. ( 2007). Conversation at the erotic oasis. Journal of Men’s Studies, 15, 147-159.
33.
Troiden, R. ( 1974). Homosexual encounters in a highway rest stop. In E. Goode & R. Troiden (Eds.), Sexual Deviance and Sexual Deviants (pp. 211-228). New York: William Morrow.
34.
Scully, L.D. ( 1997). Case Comment: Constitutional law-Defendants must make a credible showing of selective prosecution in order to obtain discovery-United States v. Armstrong, 116 S. Ct. 1480. 31Suffolk U.L. Rev553, 553+.
35.
U.S. Const. amend. V. United States Constitution, Fifth Amendment.
36.
U.S. Const. amend. XIV, sec. 2. United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment.
37.
Weinberg, M. & Williams, C. ( 1975). Gay baths and the social organization of impersonal sex . Social Problems, 23, 124-136.
