The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in online victimization between genders, through variables representing the three constructs of routine activity theory. A survey was administered to 100-level courses at a mid-sized university in the northeast, which questioned respondent on their Internet behaviors and experiences during the high school senior and college freshman time period. The findings of the study indicated that participating in behaviors that increased exposure to motivated offenders and target suitability in turn increased the likelihood of victimization for both genders. Conversely, taking protective measures to improve capable guardianship was shown to be the least effective measure, as it did not decrease the likelihood of victimization. This research provides a significant contribution to the literature as there are few explanatory studies that attempt to identify causal reasoning for this behavior.
Addison, D. ( 2001). Youngsters increase time online as sites seek return visits. Marketing, 10.
2.
Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. ( 1997). Statistical methods for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Arnold, R., Keane, C., & Baron, S. ( 2005). Assessing risk of victimization through epidemiological concepts: An alternative analytic strategy applied to routine activities theory . Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 423, 345-364.
4.
Bendel, R., & Afifi, A. ( 1977). Comparison of stopping rules in forward regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72, 46-53.
5.
Bernburg, J., & Thorlindsson, T. (2001). Routine activities in social context: A closer look at the role of opportunity in deviant behavior . Justice Quarterly, 18, 543-567.
6.
Brantingham, P., & Brantingham, P. (1981). Environmental criminology . Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
7.
Cao, L., & Maume, D. ( 1993). Urbanization, inequality, lifestyles and robbery: A comprehensive model. Sociological Focus, 26, 11-26.
8.
Clemmitt, M. ( 2006). Cyber socializing. CQ Researcher, 16, 1-34.
9.
Cohen, L., & Cantor, D. ( 1980). The determinants of larceny: An empirical and theoretical study. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 17, 140-159.
10.
Cohen, L., & Felson, M. ( 1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
11.
Cohen, L., & Felson, M. ( 1981). Modeling crime trends: A criminal opportunity perspective . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18, 138-164.
12.
Felson, M. ( 1986). Linking criminal choices, routine activities, informal social control, and criminal outcomes. In D. Cornish & R. Clarke (Eds.), The reasoning criminal (pp. 119-128). New York: Springer-Verlag.
13.
Finn, J. ( 2004). A survey of online harassment at a university campus . Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 468-483.
14.
Forde, D., & Kennedy, L. ( 1997). Risky lifestyles, routine activities, and the general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 14, 265-289.
15.
Gaetz, S. ( 2004). Safe streets for whom? Homeless youth, social exclusion, and criminal victimization. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46, 423-455.
16.
Garofalo, J., & Clark, D. ( 1992). Guardianship and residential burglary. Justice Quarterly, 9, 443-463.
17.
Giedd, J., Blumenthal, J., Jeffries, N., Castellanos, F., Liu, H., Zijdenbos, A., et al. (1999). Brain development during childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal MRI study. Nature Neuroscience , 2, 861-863.
18.
Greenwood, B. ( 2009). Pew repots: Internet age barrier vanishing. Information Today. Retrieved October 10, 2009, from http://www.infotoday.com
Harris Interactive. (2001). Presenting: The class of 2001. Retrieved September 2, 2005, from http://www. harrisinteractive.com/news/allnewsbydate.asp?NewsID=292
21.
Hawley, A. ( 1950). Human ecology. New York: The Ronald Press Company.
22.
Hindelang, M., Gottfredson, M., & Garofalo, J. ( 1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
23.
Holt, T., & Bossler, A. ( 2009). Examining the applicability of lifestyle-routine activities theory for cyber crime victimization. Deviant Behavior, 30, 1-25.
24.
Hunley, S., Evans, J., Delgado-Hachey, M., Krise, J., Rich, T., & Schell, C. ( 2005). Adolescent computer use and academic achievement. Adolescence, 40, 307-318.
25.
Jones, S. ( 1999). Doing Internet research. London: SAGE.
26.
Jones, S., & Fox, S. ( 2009). Generations online in 2009. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved June 12, 2009, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/Generations-Online-in-2009.aspx
27.
Kendall, V. ( 1998). The lost child: Congress’s inability to protect our teenagers. Northwestern University Law Review, 92, 1307-1315.
28.
Kirkpatrick, M. ( 2006, May 17). Top 10 social networking sites see 47 percent growth. Thesocialsoftwareweblog. Retrieved September 25, 2006, from http://socialsoftware.weblogsinc.com
29.
LaGrange, T. ( 1999). The impact of neighborhoods, schools, and malls on the spatial distribution of property damage. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 393-422.
30.
Lamb, A., & Johnson, L. ( 2006). Want to be my friend? What you need to know about social technologies. Teacher Librarian, 34, 55-57.
31.
Leiner, B., Cerf, V., Clark, D., Kahn, R., Kleinrock, L., Lynch, D., et al. (2003). A brief history of the Internet. Internet Society. Retrieved September 24, 2006, from http://www.isoc.org/internet/history/brief.shtml
32.
Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. ( 2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-message generation and the internet’s impact on friendships and family relationships . Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved September 25, 2006, from www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=36
33.
Lin, C., & Yu, S. ( 2008). Adolescent Internet usage in Taiwan: Exploring gender differences. Adolescence, 43, 317-331.
34.
Lwin, M., Stanaland, A., & Miyazaki, A. ( 2008). Protecting children’s privacy online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 84, 205-217.
35.
Madriz, E. ( 1996). The perception of risk in the workplace: A test of routine activity theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 407-412.
36.
Marcum, C.D. (IN PRESS). Adolescent online victimization: Comparing genders through a test of routine activities theory. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture.
37.
Medaris, M., & Girouard, C. ( 2002). Protecting children in cyberspace: The ICAC task force program. Washington, DC: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.
38.
Meier, R., & Miethe, T. ( 1993). Understanding theories of criminal victimization. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (pp. 459-499). University of Chicago Press.
Messner, S., & Tardiff, K. ( 1985). The social ecology of urban homicide: An application of the routine activities approach. Criminology, 23, 241-267.
41.
Meyers, L., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. ( 2005). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
42.
Mitchell, K., Finkelhor, D., & Becker-Blease, K. (2007). Classification of adults with problematic Internet experiences: Linking Internet and conventional problems from a clinical perspective. CyberPsychology & Behavior , 10, 381-392.
43.
Mitchell, K., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. ( 2003). The exposure of youth to unwanted sexual material on the Internet: A national survey of risk, impact and prevention. Youth and Society, 34, 300-358.
44.
Mitchell, K., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. ( 2007). Youth Internet users at risk for the more serious online sexual solicitations. American Journal of Preventative Medicine , 32, 532-537.
45.
Mottram, A., & Fleming, M. ( 2009). Extraversion, impulsivity, and online group membership as predictors of problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 319-321.
46.
Mustaine, E., & Tewksbury, R. ( 1999). A routine activities theory explanation for women’s stalking victimization. Violence Against Women, 5, 43-62.
47.
Nie, N., & Erbring, L. ( 2000). Internet and society: A preliminary report. Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society.
48.
O’Connell, R., Barrow, C., & Sange, S. ( 2002). Young peoples use of chat rooms: Implications for policy strategies and programs of education. Retrieved November 1, 2005, from http://www.uclan.ac.uk/host/cru/publications.htm
49.
Quayle, E., & Taylor, M. ( 2003). Model of problematic internet use in people with a sexual interest in children. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 93-106.
50.
Rainie, L. ( 2006). Life online: Teens and technology and the world to come . Speech to the annual conference of the Public Library Association , Boston. Retrieved October 1, 2006 , from www.pewinternet.org/ppt/Teens%20and%20technology.pdf
51.
Roberts, D., Foehr, U., Rideout, V., & Brodie, M. ( 1999). Kids and media @ the new millennium: A comprehensive analysis of children’s media use. Menlo Park, CA : The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
52.
Roncek, D., & Bell, R. ( 1981). Bars, blocks, and crimes. Journal of Environmental Systems, 11, 35-47.
53.
Roncek, D., & Maier, P. ( 1991). Bars, blocks, and crimes revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of ‘‘hot spots. ’’ Criminology, 29, 725-753.
54.
Rosen, L. ( 2006). Adolescents in MySpace: Identity formation, friendship and sexual predators. Dominguez HillsCalifornia State University.
55.
Sanger, D., Long, A., Ritzman, M., Stofer, K., & Davis, C. ( 2004). Opinions of female juvenile delinquents about their interactions in chat rooms. Journal of Correctional Education, 55, 120-131.
56.
Sasse, S. ( 2005). ‘‘Motivation’’ and routine activities theory. Deviant Behavior, 26, 547-570.
57.
Schreck, C., & Fisher, B. ( 2004). Specifying the influence of the family and peers on violent and victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1021-1041.
58.
Schwartz, M., DeKeseredy, W., Tait, D., & Alvi, S. ( 2001). Male peer support and a feminist routine activities theory: Understanding sexual assault on the college campus. Justice Quarterly, 18, 623-649.
59.
Simon, J. ( 2006). Computer-mediated communication: Task performance and satisfaction. Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 349-379.
60.
Spano, R., & Nagy, S. ( 2005). Social guardianship and social isolation: An application and extension of lifestyle/routine activities theory to rural adolescents . Rural Sociology, 70, 414-437.
61.
Steinberg, L. ( 2004). Risking-taking in adolescence: What changes, and why ? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021, 51-58.
62.
Stevens, J. ( 1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63.
Stutzman, F. ( 2006). Social networking on campus. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
64.
Tarbox, K. ( 2000). Katie.com. New York: Penguin.
65.
Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. ( 2000). Routine activities and vandalism: A theoretical and empirical study. Journal of Crime and Justice, 23, 81-110.
66.
Tseloni, A., Wittebrood, K., Farrell, G., & Pease, K. ( 2004). Burglary victimization in England and Wales, the United States and the Netherlands. The British Journal of Criminology , 44, 66-91.
67.
Wang, J. ( 2002). Bank robberies by an Asian gang: An assessment of the routine activities theory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 555-568.
68.
Wells, M., & Mitchell, K. ( 2007). Youth sexual exploitation on the Internet: DSM-IV diagnoses and gender differences in co-occurring mental health issues. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 24, 235-260.
69.
Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. ( 2002). Close online relationships in a national sample of adolescents . Adolescence, 37, 441-455.
70.
Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. ( 2003). Escaping or connecting? Characteristics of youth who form close online relationships. Journal of Adolescent Health , 26, 105-119.
71.
Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. ( 2004). Internet-initiated sex crimes against minors: Implications for prevention based on findings from a national study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 11-20.
72.
Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. ( 2006). Online victimization of children: Five years later. Washington, DC: National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
73.
Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. ( 2007). Unwanted and wanted exposure to online pornography in a national sample of youth Internet users. Pediatrics, 119, 247-257.
74.
Ybarra, M., Mitchell, K., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. ( 2007). Internet prevention messages: Targeting the right online behaviors. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 161, 138-145.
