Second Amendment issues regarding the right to bear arms in the home have come into focus recently with the U.S. Supreme Court landmark decision in District of Columbia v. Heller. Despite strong antigun sentiment in the wake of high-profile shootings, sweeping new castle doctrine legislation has passed in 23 states in the last 4 years. These laws effectively expand individuals’ right to defend their home and possessions with lethal force without the necessity to retreat. To date, there is little criminological research that examines the evolution of the modern castle doctrine legislation in the United States. The present article addresses this gap in the literature by offering a historical perspective on the legal etiology of the castle doctrine relating to self-defense and then analyzes existing and pending castle doctrine legislation through December 2008. A discussion of the legal and criminological implications of these statutes on public policy is offered.
Alvarez, A., & Bachman, R. ( 2008). Violence: The enduring problem. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
Askew v. State, 94 Ala. 4; 10 So. 567 (1891).
5.
Bean v. State, 25 Tex. Ct. App. 346 (1888).
6.
Beard v. United States, 158 U.S. 550 (1895).
7.
Brown, R.M. ( 1975). Strain of violence: Historical studies of American violence and vigilantism. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Brown, R.M. ( 1991). No duty to retreat: Violence and values in American history and society. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Brown v. State, 256 U.S. 335 (1921).
10.
Cannon v. State, 464 So. 2d 149 (1985).
11.
Casenote. (1904). Homicide. Self-defense. Necessity of retreat. Yale Law Journal , 13, 398-399.
12.
Catalano, S.M. ( 2006). Criminal victimization, 2005. Retrieved January 24, 2007, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cv05.pdf
13.
Catalfamo, C. ( 2007). Stand your ground: Florida’s Castle Doctrine for the twenty-first century. Rutgers Journal of Law & Public Policy, 4, 504-545.
14.
Celinska, K. ( 2007). Individualism and collectivism in America: The case of gun ownership and attitudes toward gun control. Sociological Perspectives, 50, 229-247.
15.
Ceron, A.X. ( 2008, July 30). Port St. Lucie homeowner shoots would-be intruder . Palm Beach Post, p. 1B.
16.
Commonwealth v. Drum, 58 Pa. 9 (1868).
17.
Cornell, S., & DeDino, N. (2004). Historical perspective: A well regulated right: The early American origins of gun control. Fordham Law Review, 73, 487-528.
18.
Creek v. State, 24 Ind. 151 (1865).
19.
Crowe, R. ( 2008a, September 7). Another intruder shot by homeowner. San Antonio Express-News, p. 1B.
20.
Crowe, R. ( 2008b, July 2). Texas gun law: Right to shoot intruders: "Castle doctrine" arms homeowners. San Antonio Express-News, p. 1B.
21.
Curtis, L. A. (1985) (Ed.). American violence and public policy: An update of the national commission on the causes and prevention of violence. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
22.
District of Columbia v. Heller, 2008 U.S. Lexis 5268 (2008).
23.
Eller, J.D. ( 2006). Violence and culture: A cross-cultural and interdisciplinary approach. Belmont, CA: Thomson/ Wadsworth.
24.
Falkenberg, L. ( 2008, July 1). Burden of truth lies with Horn. Houston Chronicle, p. 1B.
25.
Florida House Bill 249, 107th Legislative Session.(n.d.). Retrieved January 21, 2008, from http://www .myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Bills/billsdetail.aspx?BillId=15738&SessionId=38
26.
Florida State University Law Review. (2005 ). Recent development: Florida legislation-The controversy over Florida’s new "Stand Your Ground" law. Florida State University Law Review, 33, 351-356.
27.
Formby, B. ( 2006, October 13). Bill to seek "castle doctrine" crime protection . The Dallas Morning News. Retrieved January 22, 2008, from http://dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/DN-castle_13wes.ART0.North.Ed
28.
Foster v. Territory of Arizona, 6 Ariz. 240 (1899).
29.
Gallup’s pulse of democracy: Gun laws. (2008). Retrieved September 23, 2008, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/1645/Guns.aspx?
30.
Grigsby v. Commonwealth, 151 Ky. 496 (1913).
31.
Hagan, F.E. ( 2003). Research methods in criminal justice and criminology . Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
32.
Harrison v. State, 24 Ala. 67 (1854).
33.
Heide, K.M., Boots, D.P., Alldredge, C., Donerly, B., & White, J.R. ( 2005) Battered child syndrome: An overview of case law and legislation . Criminal Law Bulletin, 41, 219-239.
34.
Jacobs, J.B. ( 2002). Can gun control work?New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
Jones, J.M. ( 2008). Americans in agreement with Supreme Court on gun rights . Retrieved July 10, 2008, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/108394/Americans-Agreement-Supreme-Court-Gun-Rights.aspx?version=print
36.
Jones v. State, 76 Ala. 8 (1884).
37.
Joyner, C. ( 2007, November 5). Advocates: Castle doctrine puts power in victims’ hands. Clarion-Ledger, p. 1A.
38.
Keller, L. ( 2008, May 13). Jury must decide if killing was provoked. Palm Beach Post, p. 3B.
39.
Knight, P. ( 2008, September 3). Strong majority of votes disagree with Barack Obama on Second Amendment and self defense issues. PR Newswire . Retrieved September 10, 2008, from http://www.prnewswire.com
40.
Kohn, A.A. ( 2004). Shooters: Myths and realities of America’s gun cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
Lindgren, J., & Heather, J.L. ( 2002). Counting guns in early America. William and Mary Law Review, 43, 1777-1842.
42.
Lipset, S. ( 1990). Continental divide: The values and institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.
43.
Loftin, C., & Hill, R.H. ( 1974). Regional subculture and homicide: An examination of the Gastil-Hackney Thesis. American Sociological Review, 39, 714-724.
44.
Michael, D. ( 2006). Florida’s protection of persons bill. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 43, 199-212.
45.
National Rifle Association. (2008). Retrieved December 18, 2008, from http://www.nraila.org/Search/?keyword=CASTLE%20DOCTRINE
46.
National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action. (2008). NRA files second amendment lawsuits In Illinois and California following Supreme Court Ruling. Retrieved July 8, 2008, from http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Federal/Read.aspx?id=4053
47.
Newton, G.D., & Zimring, F.E. ( 1969). Firearms and violence in American life: A staff report to the national commission on the causes and prevention of violence. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
48.
Neyland, J.P. ( 2008). A man’s car is his castle: The expansion of Texas’ "Castle Doctrine" eliminating the duty to retreat in areas outside the home . Baylor Law Review, 60, 719-748.
49.
Niquette, M. ( 2008, June 11). Self-defense law will start in November. The Columbus Dispatch, p. 03B.
50.
Olivares, K.M., Burton, V.S., & Cullen, F.T. ( 1996). The collateral consequences of a felony conviction: A national study of state legal codes 10 years later. Federal Probation, 60(3), 10-19.
51.
Parker v. District of Columbia, 375 U.S. App. D.C. 140 (2007).
52.
Pedhazur, E.J., & Schmelkin, L.P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53.
People v. Tomlins, 213 N.Y. 240 (1914).
54.
Pierson v. State, 12 Ala. 149 (1847).
55.
Reiss, A. J., & Roth, J. A. (Eds.). (1993). Understanding and preventing violence. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
56.
Rosenberg, M.L., & Mercy, J.A. ( 1991). Assaultive violence. In M. L. Rosenberg & M. A. Fenley (Eds.), Violence in America: A public health approach (pp. 14-50). New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
Roger v. State, 670 So. 2d 160 (1996).
58.
Rogers, B., Rendon, R., Lezon, D., & Latson, J. ( 2008, July 1). The Joe Horn decision: The case concludes. The Houston Chronicle, p. 1A.
59.
Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80 (1877).
60.
Self-defense was no defense in stabbing death (2007, November 14). Dallas Morning News. Retrieved February 3, 2009, from http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/crime/stories/DN-ujday4sider3_14pro.ART.State.Edition1.d67c46.html
61.
Smith, T.W. ( 2002). Public opinion about gun policies. The Future of Children, 12, 155-163.
62.
State v. Castle, 133 N.C. 769 (1903).
63.
State v. Gardner, 104 N.W. 971 (1905).
64.
State v. McCracken, 22 N.M. 588 (1917).
65.
State v. Metcalfe, 206 N.W. 620 (1925).
66.
Stephens, R. ( 2008). Life and liberty: Seven factors that will better evaluate self-defense in Nevada’s common law on retreat. Nevada Law Journal, 8, 649-671.
67.
Thompson, S. ( 2008, January 20). Drivers now allowed to be armed, but critics see potential for abuse. The Dallas Morning News, pp. 1A, 24A-25A.
68.
Turner, M.G., Sundt, J.L., Applegate, B.K., & Cullen, F.T. ( 1995). "Three strikes and you’re out" legislation: A national assessment. Federal Probation, 59(3), 16-37.
69.
Tweedy v. State, 5 Iowa 433 (1857).
70.
Unis v. State, 717 So. 2d 581 (1998).
71.
United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939).
72.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2008). Expanded homicide data: Justified homicide by weapon, private citizen, 2003-2007 . Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2007/offenses/expanded_information/data/shrtable_14.html
73.
Watts v. State, 177 Ala. 24 (1912).
74.
Weiand v. State, 732 So. 2d 1044 (1999).
75.
Wright, J.D., Rossi, P.H., & Daly, K. ( 1983). Under the gun: Weapons, crime, and violence in America . New York: Aldine.
76.
Young, M.E. ( 2008a, January 20). NRA, Brady Campaign in passionate fight over gun rights. The Dallas Morning News. Retrieved January 22, 2008, from http://www.dallasnews.com/content/dws/news/texassouthwest/stories/DN0nrabrady_20met.ART
77.
Young, M.E. ( 2008b, January 20). Some worry new castle law will make people quicker on trigger. The Dallas Morning News, pp. 1A, 24A-25A.
