This analysis focuses on misconduct rates and inmates’ perceptions of safety at 10 low-security prisons. Performance measures derived from two different data sources, inmate survey data and agency records of inmate misconduct, are compared. The findings demonstrate that the rankings of the prisons with performance measures derived from inmates’ perception of safety correlate with measures obtained from official misconduct rates. These findings provide evidence regarding the validity and reliability of inmate survey and official misconduct data when assessing conditions of confinement.
Archambeault, W.G., & Deis, D.R. ( 1996). Cost-effectiveness comparisons of private versus public prisons in Louisiana: A comprehensive analysis of Allen, Avoyelles, and Winn correctional centers. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.
2.
Blumstein, A., & Beck, A.F. ( 1999). Population growth in U.S. Prisons, 1980-1996. In M. Tonry & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Prisons (pp. 1-16). Chicago : The University of Chicago Press.
3.
Bursik, R.J.J., & Grasmik, H.G. ( 1993). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
4.
Camp, S.D. ( 1999). Do inmate survey data reflect prison conditions? Using surveys to assess prison conditions of confinement. The Prison Journal, 79, 250-268.
5.
Camp, S.D., & Daggett, D.M. ( 2005). Quality of operations at private and public prisons: Using trend in inmate misconduct to compare prisons. Justice Research and Policy, 7, 27-52.
6.
Camp, S.D., Gaes, G.G., Klein-Saffran, J., Daggett, D.M., & Saylor, W.G. ( 2002). Using inmate survey data in assessing prison performance: A case study comparing private and public prisons. Criminal Justice Review, 27, 26-51.
7.
Camp, S.D., Gaes, G.G., Langan, N.P., & Saylor, W.G. ( 2003). The influence of prisons on inmate misconduct: A multilevel investigation. Justice Quarterly, 20, 501-533.
8.
Camp, S.D., Gaes, G.G., & Saylor, W.G. ( 2002). Quality of prison operations in the federal sector: A comparison with a private prisonPunishment & Society , 4, 27-53.
Caperton, J., Edens, J.F., & Johnson, J.K. ( 2004). Predicting sex offender institutional adjustment and treatment compliance using the personality assessment inventory. Psychological Assessment, 16, 187-191.
11.
Foucault, M. ( 1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.
12.
Freeman, R.M. ( 2003). Social distance and discretionary rule enforcement in a women’s prison. The Prison Journal, 83, 191-205.
13.
French, S.A., & Gendreau, P. ( 2006). Reducing prison misconducts: What works!Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 185-218.
14.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C.E., & Law, M.A. ( 1997). Predicting prison misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 414-431.
15.
Goffman, E. ( 1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. New York: Anchor .
16.
Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. ( 1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
Hanson, R.W., Moss, C.S., Hosford, R.E., & Johnson, M.E. ( 1983). Predicting inmate penitentiary adjustment: An assessment of four classificatory methods. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 10, 293-309.
18.
Howard, C., Winfree, L.T.J., Mays, G.L., Stohr, M.K., & Clason, D.L. ( 1994). Processing inmate disciplinary infractions in a federal correctional institution: Legal and extralegal correlates of prison-based legal decisions. The Prison Journal, 73, 5-31.
19.
Irwin, J. ( 2005). The warehouse prison: Disposal of the new dangerous class . Los Angeles: Roxbury.
20.
Jiang, S., & Fisher-Giorlando, M. (2002). Inmate misconduct: A test of the deprivation, importation, and situational models. The Prison Journal, 82, 335-358.
21.
Jones, R.S., & Schmid, T.J. ( 2000). Doing time: Prison experience and identity among first-time inmates. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
22.
Kelling, G.L. ( 1992). Measuring what matters: A new way of thinking about crime and public order. City Journal, 2(2), 21-23.
23.
Kelling, G.L., & Coles, C.M. ( 1996). Fixing broken windows: Restoring order and reducing crime in our communities. New York: Touchstone .
Lanza-Kaduce, L., Parker, K.F., & Thomas, C.W. ( 1999). A comparative recidivism analysis of releasees from private and public prisons. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 28-47.
26.
Light, S.C. ( 1990). Measurement error in official statistics: Prison rule infraction data. Federal Probation, 54, 63-69.
27.
Logan, C.H. ( 1992). Well kept: Comparing quality of confinement in private and public prisons. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology , 83, 577-613.
28.
Mosher, C.J., Miethe, T.D., & Philips, D.M. ( 2002). The mismeasure of crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
O’Donnell, I., & Edgar, K. ( 1998). Routine victimisation in prisons. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 266-279.
30.
O’Donnell, I., & Edgar, K. ( 1999). Fear in prison. The Prison Journal, 79, 90-99.
31.
Paternoster, R., & Iovanni, L. ( 1986). The deterrent effect of perceived severity: A reexamination . Social Forces, 64, 751-777.
32.
Perrone, D., & Pratt, T.C. ( 2003). Comparing the quality of confinement and cost-effectiveness of public versus private prisons: What we know, why we do not know more, and where to go from here. The Prison Journal, 83, 301-322.
33.
Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. ( 2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Saltzman, L., Paternoster, R., Waldo, G., & Chiricos, T. ( 1982). Deterrent and experiential effects: The problem of causal order in perceptual deterrence research. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 19, 172-189.
36.
Sampson, R.J., & Raudenbush, S. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 603-651.
37.
Sampson, R.J., Raudenbush, S.W., & Earls, F. ( 1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918-924.
38.
Saylor, W.G. ( 1984). Surveying prison environments. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons.
39.
Schafer, J.L. ( 1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman & Hall.
40.
Skogan, W.G. ( 1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41.
Skogan, W.G., & Maxfield, M.G. (1981). Coping with crime: Individual and neighborhood reactions. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
42.
Sousa, W.H., & Kelling, G.L. ( 2006). Of "broken windows," criminology and criminal justice . In D. Weisburd & A. A. Braga (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 77-97). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
Taylor, R.B. ( 2002). Fear of crime, social ties, and collective efficacy: Maybe masquerading measurement, maybe deja vu all over again. Justice Quarterly, 19, 773-792.
44.
Taylor, R.B. ( 2006). Incivilities reduction policing, zero tolerance, and the retreat from coproduction: Weak foundations and strong pressures. In D. Weisburd & A. A. Braga (Eds.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 98-116). New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Walmsley, R., Howard, E., & White, S. ( 1992). The national prison survey 1991: Main findings. London: HMSO.
46.
Warr, M., & Stafford, M. ( 1983). Fear of victimization: A look at the proximate causes . Social Forces, 61, 1033-1043.
47.
Wilson, J.Q., & Kelling, G.L. ( 1982, March). Broken windows. The Atlantic Monthly , pp. 29-38.
48.
Wooldredge, J. ( 2003). Keeping pace with evolving prison populations for effective management. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 253-258.
49.
Wooldredge, J., Griffin, T., & Pratt, T. ( 2001). Considering hierarchical models for research on inmate behavior: Predicting misconduct with multilevel data. Justice Quarterly, 18, 203-231.
50.
Wright, K.N. ( 1985). Developing the prison environment inventory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 257-277.
51.
Wright, K.N. ( 1988). The relationship of risk, needs and personality classification systems and prison adjustment. Criminal Justice and Behavior , 15, 454-471.
