Using sentencing data from 1994 to 2002, spanning two different sentencing policies, this study examines the complex relationship between felony offenders' prior record, race/ethnicity, current offense, and sentencing outcomes. Expanding on past research, this study incorporates multiple dimensions of prior record and analyzes the differential impact of these dimensions across race/ethnicity and offense type. Unlike previous research, the current study examines these complex effects across different sentencing policies. The findings suggest that sentencing authorities' calculations of risk and dangerousness may not be based solely on legal considerations such as prior record and offense type or on extralegal factors such as race and ethnicity. Instead, it appears that a complex interplay exists between these legal and extralegal characteristics. Furthermore, the importance of policy change with regard to prior record and race/ethnicity is highlighted by the findings.
Albonetti, C.A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247-266.
2.
Albonetti, C.A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law & Society Review , 31, 789-822.
3.
Beckett, K., & Sasson, T. (2000). The politics of injustice: Crime and punishment in America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
4.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Martin, S. E., & Tonry, M. (Eds.). (1983). Research on sentencing: The search for reform (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5.
Bontrager, S., Bales, W., & Chiricos, T. (2005). Race, ethnicity, threat and the labeling of convicted felons. Criminology, 43, 589-622.
6.
Brame, R., Paternoster, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Testing for the equality of maximum likelihood regression coefficients between two independent equations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 245-261.
7.
Bushway, S.D., & Piehl, A.M. (2001). Judging judicial discretion: Legal factors and racial discrimination in sentencing. Law & Society Review , 35, 733-764.
8.
Chiricos, T., & Crawford, C. (1995). Race and imprisonment: A contextual assessment of the evidence. In D. Hawkins (Ed.), Ethnicity, race and crime (pp. 281-309). Albany, NY : SUNY Press.
9.
Crow, M.S., & Bales, W. (2006). Sentencing guidelines and focal concerns: The effect of sentencing policy as a practical constraint on sentencing decisions . American Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 285-304.
10.
Crow, M.S., & Gertz, M. (2008). Sentencing policy and disparity: Guidelines and the influence of legal and democratic subcultures. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(4), (forthcoming).
11.
Crow, M.S., & Johnson, K. (2008). Race, ethnicity, and habitual offender sentencing: A multilevel analysis of individual and contextual threat. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19, 63-83.
12.
Engen, R.L., & Gainey, R.R. (2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38, 1207-1229.
13.
Florida Department of Corrections. (1999). Florida's criminal punishment code: A descriptive assessment (FY 1998-1999). Retrieved January 25, 2005, from http://www.dc.state.fl.us/pub/sg_annual/9899/intro.html
14.
Griset, P.L. (1996). Determinate sentencing and administrative discretion over time served in prison: A case study of Florida. Crime & Delinquency, 42, 127-143.
15.
Griset, P.L. (2002). New sentencing laws follow old patterns: A Florida case study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 287-301.
16.
Griswold, D.B. (1985). Florida's sentencing guidelines: Progression or regression? Federal Probation, 49, 25-32.
17.
Griswold, D.B., & Dobrin, A.L. (2000). A critical not on the Criminal Punishment Code: Florida's alternative to its sentencing guidelines. Corrections Management Quarterly, 4, 78-82.
18.
Horan, P.M., Myers, M.A., & Farnworth, M. (1982). Prior record and court processes: The role of latent theory in criminology research. Sociology and Social Research, 67, 41-58.
19.
Jaccard, J. (2001). Interaction effects in logistic regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Jendrek, M.P. (1984). Sentence length: Interactions with race and court . Journal of Criminal Justice, 12, 567-578.
21.
Johnson, B.D. (2003). Racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing departures across modes of conviction. Criminology, 41, 449-490.
22.
Johnson, B.D. (2005). Contextual disparities in guidelines departures: Courtroom social contexts, guidelines compliance, and extralegal disparities in criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43, 761-796.
23.
Kautt, P., & Spohn, C. (2002). Crack-ing down on black drug offenders? Testing for interactions among offenders' race, drug type, and sentencing strategy in federal drug sentences. Justice Quarterly, 19, 1-35.
24.
Kleck, G. (1981). Racial discrimination in criminal sentencing: A critical evaluation of the evidence with additional evidence on the death penalty. American Sociological Review, 46, 783-805.
25.
Kleck, G. (1985). Life support for ailing hypotheses: Modes of summarizing the evidence for racial discrimination in sentencing. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 271-285.
26.
Klein, S., Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1990). Race and imprisonment decisions in California . Science, 247, 812-816.
27.
Kramer, J., & Steffensmeier, D. (1993). Race and imprisonment decisions. Sociological Quarterly, 34, 357-376.
28.
Maxwell, C.D., Robinson, A.L., & Post, L.A. (2003). The impact of race on the adjudication of sexual assault and other violent crimes. Journal of Criminal Justice , 31, 523-538.
29.
Mitchell, O. (2005). A meta-analysis of race and sentencing research: Explaining the inconsistencies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 21, 439-466.
30.
Myers, M.A. (1989). Symbolic policy and the sentencing of drug offenders . Law & Society Review, 23, 295-315.
31.
Nelson, J.F. (1989). An operational definition of prior criminal record . Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5, 333-352.
32.
Russell, K.K. (1998). The color of crime. New York : New York University Press.
33.
Savelsberg, J.J. (1992). Law that does not fit society: Sentencing guidelines as a neoclassical reaction to the dilemmas of substantivized law. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1346-1381.
34.
Singer, R. (1979). Just deserts: Sentencing based on equality and desert. Camden, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
35.
Spohn, C. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. In J. Horney, R. Peterson, D. MacKenzie, J. Martin, & D. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system (pp. 427-501). Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
36.
Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. (2000). When does race matter? An analysis of the conditions under which race affects sentence severity. Sociology of Crime, Law, and Deviance, 2, 3-37.
37.
Spohn, C., & Spears, J. (2000). Sentencing of drug offenders in three cities: Does race/ethnicity make a difference? In D. F. Hawkins, S. L. Myers, Jr., & R. N. Stone (Eds.), Crime control and social justice: A delicate balance. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
38.
Spohn, C., & Welch, S. (1987). The effect of prior record in sentencing research: An examination of the assumption that any measure is adequate. Justice Quarterly, 4, 287-302.
39.
Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review, 65, 705-729.
40.
Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2001). Ethnicity and judges' sentencing decisions: Hispanic-Black-White comparisons. Criminology, 39, 145-178.
41.
Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Ulmer, J. (1995). Age differences in sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 12, 583-602.
42.
Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-797.
43.
Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing matters. New York : Oxford University Press.
44.
Ulmer, J.T., & Bradley, M.S. (2006). Variation in trial penalties among serious violent offenses. Criminology, 44, 631-670.
45.
Ulmer, J.T., & Johnson, B. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137-177.
46.
Vigorita, M.S. (2001). Prior offense type and the probability of incarceration: The importance of current offense type and sentencing jurisdiction. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 17, 167-193.
47.
von Hirsch, A. (1976). Doing justice: The choice of punishments. New York: Hill & Wang.
48.
Walker, S., Spohn, C., & DeLone, M. (1996). The color of justice: Race, ethnicity, and crime in America. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
49.
Welch, S., Gruhl, J., & Spohn, C. (1984). Sentencing: The influence of alternative measures of prior record. Criminology, 22, 215-227.
50.
Welch, S., & Spohn, C. (1986). Evaluating the impact of prior record on judges sentencing decisions: A seven city comparison. Justice Quarterly , 3, 389-407.
51.
Wooldredge, J., & Griffin, T. (2005). Displaced discretion under Ohio sentencing guidelines . Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 301-316.
52.
Wooldredge, J., Griffin, T., & Rauschenberg, F. (2005). (Un)anticipated effects of sentencing reform on the disparate treatment of defendants. Law & Society Review, 39, 835-873.
53.
Wooldredge, J.D. (1998). Analytical rigor in studies of disparities in criminal case processing. Journal of Quantitative Criminology , 14, 155-179.
54.
Zatz, M.S. (1984). Race, ethnicity, and determinate sentencing: A new dimension to an old controversy. Criminology, 22, 147-171.
55.
Zatz, M.S. (1987). The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 24, 69-92.
