In this study, the effect that the sex offender registry has had on female sex offenders in two states is explored. In-depth personal interviews were conducted with nine registered female sex offenders from Illinois and Texas. Questions were asked about the arrest that led to registration and the effect that sex offender registration statutes have had on their lives. Braithwaite's crime, shame, and reintegration theory was relied on to assess the extent to which the processes described in his theory occurred in this sample. The focus of many of the questions included whether the women were able to reintegrate into their communities or if they were stigmatized. It was found that every respondent reported at least one negative effect on her life as a result of being identified on the public registry. Also, many of the stigmatization processes described by Braithwaite were applicable to the interviewed women.
Abrahamson, M. (1983). Social research methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Berg, B.L. (2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
3.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Denning, W. (2005). Sex offender laws: Some legislative responses . In F. P. Reddington & B. W. Kreisel (Eds.), Sexual assault: The victims, the perpetrators, and the criminal justice system (pp. 321-333). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
5.
Denov, M.S. (2004). Perspectives on female sex offending: A culture of denial. Burlington, VT: Ashgate .
6.
English, K., Jones, L., Patrick, D., Pasini-Hill, D., & Cooley-Towell, S. (2000). The current role of post-conviction sex offender polygraph testing in sex offender treatment. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 12(3/4), 175-194.
7.
Faller, K.C. (1987). Women who sexually abuse children. Violence and Victims, 2(4), 263-276.
8.
Faller, K.C. (1988). The spectrum of sexual abuse in daycare: An exploratory study. Journal of Family Violence, 3(4), 283-298.
9.
Faller, K.C. (1995). A clinical sample of women who have sexually abused children. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 4(3), 13-29.
10.
Farrell, L.T. (1988). Factors that affect a victim's self-disclosure in father-daughter incest. Child Welfare, 67(5), 462-468.
11.
Finkelhor, D., Hotaling, G., Lewis, I.A., & Smith, C. (1990). Sexual abuse in a national survey of adult men and women: Prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors. Child Abuse and Neglect, 14, 19-28.
12.
Freeman-Longo, R. (2002). Revisiting Megan's Law and sex offender registration: Prevention or problem. In J. F. Hodgson & D. S. Kelley (Eds.), Sexual violence: Policies, practices, and challenges in the United States and Canada (pp. 223-238). Westport, CT: Praeger.
13.
Gardner, R.A. (1999). Differentiating between parental alienation syndrome and bona fide abuse-neglect. American Journal of Family Therapy , 27, 97-107.
14.
Gentile, A. (2005). Protecting residents from sex offenders. American City and County, 120(11), 12, 14.
15.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
16.
Hagan, F.E. (2006). Research methods in criminal justice and criminology (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17.
Hampton, K.S. (2001). Child in the war on crime: Texas sex offender mania and the outcasts of reform. Texas Law Review, 42, 781-840.
18.
Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Program, 42 U.S.C. § 14071 (2003).
19.
Kansas v. Hendricks, 117 S. Ct. 2072, 138, 138 L. Ed. 2d 501 (1997).
20.
Levenson, J.S., & Cotter, L.P. (2005). The impact of Megan's Law on sex offender reintegration . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 49-66.
21.
Lewis, C.F., & Stanley, C.R. (2000). Women accused of sexual offenses. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 73-81.
22.
Logan, W. (1999). Liberty interests in the preventive states: Procedural due process and sex offender community notification laws. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 89, 1167-1231.
23.
Mathews, R. (1987). Preliminary typology of female sexual offenders . Unpublished document.
24.
Mathews, R., Hunter, J.A., Jr., & Vuz, J. (1997). Juvenile female sexual offenders: Clinical characteristics and treatment issues. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9(3), 187-199.
25.
Mathews, R., Matthews, J.K., & Speltz, K. (1989). Female sexual offenders: An exploratory study. Orwell, VTSafer Society Press.
26.
Maxfield, M.G., & Babbie, E. (2006). Basics of research methods for criminal justice and criminology. Belmont, CA: Thomson /Wadsworth.
27.
Mayer, A. (1992). Women sex offenders. Holmes Beach, FL: Learning.
28.
McCarty, L.M. (1981). Investigation of incest: Opportunity to motivate families to seek help. Child Welfare, 60, 679-689.
29.
McCarty, L.M. (1986). Mother-child incest: Characteristics of the offender . Child Welfare, 65(5), 447-458.
30.
Megan's Law, 42 U.S.C. § 13701 (2001).
31.
Miccio-Fonseca, L.C. (2000). Adult and adolescent female sex offenders: Experiences compared to other female and male sex offenders. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 11(3), 75-88.
32.
Nathan, P., & Ward, T. (2001). Females who sexually abused children: Assessment and treatment issues. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 8(1), 44-55.
33.
Nathan, P., & Ward, T. (2002). Female sex offenders: Clinical and demographic features. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 8(1), 5-21.
34.
Patton, M.Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Powers, P.A. (2003-2004). Making a spectacle of panopticism: A theoretical evaluation of sex offender registration and notification. New England Law Review, 38, 1049-1086.
36.
Rosencrans, B. (1997). The last secret: Daughters sexually abused by mothers. Orwell, VTSafer Society Press.
37.
Rowan, E.L., Rowan, J.B., & Langelier, P. (1990). Women who molest children. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 18(1), 79-83.
38.
Rudin, M.M., Zalewski, C., & Bodmer-Turner, J. (1995). Characteristics of child sexual abuse victims according to perpetrator gender. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19(8), 963-973.
39.
Sample, L.L., & Bray, T.M. (2003). Are sex offenders dangerous?Criminology & Public Policy, 3(1), 59-82.
40.
Sarrel, P.M., & Masters, W.H. (1982). Sexual molestation of men by women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 11(2), 117-131.
41.
Schofield, R. (2006). National sex offender public registry. Public Management, 88(1), 35.
42.
Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1984). Convicted rapists' vocabulary of motives: Excuses and justifications. Social Problems, 31(5), 530-544.
43.
Syed, F., & Williams, S. (1996). Case studies of female sex offenders. Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada.
44.
Terry, K. (2006). Sexual offenses and offenders: Theory, practice and policy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth .
45.
Tewksbury, R. (2004). Experiences and attitudes of registered female sex offenders. Federal Probation, 68(3), 30-33.
46.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2005a). Criminal victimization in the United States, 2003. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
47.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2005b). Uniform crime reports, 2004. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
48.
Vandiver, D.M. (2006). Female sex offenders: A comparison of solo offenders and co-offenders. Violence and Victims, 21(3), 339-354.
49.
Vandiver, D.M., & Kercher, G. (2004). Offender and victim characteristics of registered female sexual offenders in Texas: A proposed typology of female sexual offenders . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16(2), 121-137.
50.
Vandiver, D.M., & Walker, J.T. (2002). Female sex offenders: An overview and analysis of 40 cases. Criminal Justice Review, 27(2), 284-300.
51.
Winick, B. (1998). Sex offender law in the 1990s: A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 4, 505-570.
