Youth violence, including bullying and other serious violent behaviors, has received increased political and scientific attention over the past several decades. Although violent behavior among youth and in the schools has declined over the past decade, the victimization of children by other children in school settings remains a major issue of concern. In response, a number of prevention and intervention programs have been developed to reduce the incidence of bullying and violence in schools. This meta-analysis attempted to examine the effect of school-based anti-bullying programs. Results suggested a significant effect for anti-bullying programs (r = .12). However, this result seemed to be slightly influenced by publication bias and did not meet the adopted threshold for “practical significance.” The effect for programs targeted specifically at at-risk youth was slightly better, but overall, anti-bullying programs produce little discernible effect on youth participants. Reasons that anti-bullying programs may produce little effective change are discussed.
Ahmed, E., & Braithwaite, V. (2006). Forgiveness, reconciliation, and shame: Three key variables in reducing school bullying. Journal of Social Issues, 62(2), 347-370.
2.
Ambert, A. (1994). A qualitative study of peer abuse and its effects: Theoretical and empirical implications. Journal of Marriage and Family, 56, 119-130.
3.
American Psychological Association. (2006). An APA brochure on youth violence. Retrieved September 2, 2006 , from http://www.apa.org/ppo/issues/pbviolence.html
4.
Begg, C., & Mazumdar, G. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50, 1088-1101.
5.
Bobko, P., & Stone-Romero, E. (1998). Meta-analysis may be another useful research tool but it is not a panacea. In G. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management, Vol. 16 (pp. 359-397). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
6.
Bollmer, J.M., Harris, M.J., & Milich, R. (2006). Reactions to bullying and peer victimization: Narratives, physiological arousal, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 803-828.
7.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and integration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T., Mill, J., Martin, J., Craig, I., et al. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297, 851-854.
9.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin,112, 155-159.
10.
Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
11.
DeVoe, E., Dean, K., Traube, D., & McKay, M. (2005). The SURVIVE community project: A family-based intervention to reduce the impact of violence exposures in urban youth. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 11, 95-116.
12.
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association,95, 89-99.
13.
Egger, M., Davey-Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629-634.
14.
Farrell, A., Meyer, A., Kung, E., & Sullivan, T. (2001). Development and evaluation of school-based violence prevention programs. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology , 30, 207-220.
15.
Farrell, A., Meyer, A., Sullivan, T., & Kung, E. (2003). Evaluation of the Responding in Peaceful and Positive Ways (RIPP) seventh grade violence prevention curriculum. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12(1), 101-120.
16.
Farrell, A., Meyer, A., & White, K. (2001). Evaluation of Responding in Peaceful and Positive Ways (RIPP): A school-based prevention program for reducing violence among urban adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30(4), 451-463.
17.
Ferguson, C.J. (2007a). Evidence for publication bias in video game violence effects literature: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 470-482.
18.
Ferguson, C.J. (2007b). Genetic contributions to antisocial personality and behavior: A meta-analytic review from an evolutionary framework. Unpublished manuscript.
19.
Gini, G. (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What's wrong?Aggressive Behavior, 32, 528-539.
20.
Haynie, D.L., Nansel, T., & Eitel, P. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: Distinct groups of at-risk youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 29-49.
21.
Hazler, R.J., Carney, J.V., & Granger, D.A. (2006). Integrating biological measures into the study of bullying. Journal of Counseling and Development, 84, 298-307.
22.
Heydenberk, R.A., Heydenberk, W.R., & Tzenova, V. (2006). Conflict resolution and bully prevention: Skills for school success. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 24(1), 55-69.
23.
Huizinga, D., Haberstick, B., Smolen, A., Menard, S., Young, S., Corley, R., et al. (2006). Childhood maltreatment, subsequent antisocial behavior, and the role of monoamine oxidase A genotype. BiologicalPsychiatry, 60, 677-683.
24.
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D.P. (2006). Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 540-550.
26.
Kyriakides, L., Kaloyirou, C., & Lindsay, G. (2006). An analysis of the revised Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire using the Rasch measurement model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 781-801.
27.
Lance, C., & Vandenberg, R. (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis . In F. Drascow & N. Schmitt (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 221—224). New York: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer .
28.
Larsson, H., Andershed, A., & Lichtenstein, P. (2006). A genetic factor explains most of the variation in the psychopathic personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 221-230.
29.
Lipsey, M.W. (1998). Design sensitivity: Statistical power for applied experimental research. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 39-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Marini, Z.A., Dane, A.V., Bosacki, S.L., & Ylc-Cura. ( 2006). Direct and indirect bully-victims: Differential psychosocial risk factors associated with adolescents involved in bullying and victimization . Aggressive Behavior, 32, 551-569.
31.
Metropolitan Area Child Study Research Group. ( 2002). A cognitive-ecological approach to preventing aggression in urban settings: Initial outcomes for high-risk children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 179-194.
32.
Nansel, T.R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R.S., Ruan, W.J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among U.S. youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of theAmerican Medical Association, 285(16), 2094-2100.
33.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 2005). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2005. Washington, DC: Author.
34.
Olweus, D. (1995). Bullying or peer abuse at school: Facts and interventions. Current Directions in Psychology, 4, 196-200.
35.
Olweus, D., Limber, S., & Mihalic, S. (1999). The bullying prevention program: Blueprints for violence prevention. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence. Retrieved October 24, 2006, from http://www.colorado.edu/cspv/safeschools/bullying/bullying_bppsummary.html
36.
Orwin, R. (1983). A Fail-Safe N for effect size in meta-analysis . Journal of Educational Statistics, 8, 157-159.
37.
Parkins, I.S., Fishbein, H.D., & Ritchey, P.N. (2006). The influence of personality on workplace bullying and discrimination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(10), 2554-2577.
38.
Phillips, D.A. (2007). Punking and bullying: Strategies in middle school, high school, and beyond. Journal of Interpersonal Violence , 22(2), 158-178.
39.
Retz, W., Retz-Junginger, P., Supprian, T., Thome, J., & Rosler, M. (2004). Association of serotonin transporter promoter gene polymorphism with violence: Relation with personality disorders, impulsivity and childhood ADHD psychopathology. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 22, 415-425.
40.
Rhee, S., & Waldman, I. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis of twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin,128, 490-529.
41.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill .
42.
Rothstein, H., Sutton, A., & Borenstein, M. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment, and adjustments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
43.
Sharp, S., & Smith, P. (1994). Tackling bullying in your school: A practical handbook for teachers. London: Routledge.
44.
Sherman, L.W. (2000). The safe and drug-free schools act. Brookings Papers onEducation Policy, pp. 125-156.
45.
Taub, J. (2001). Evaluation of the Second Step Violence Prevention Program at a rural elementary school. School Psychology Review , 31, 186-200.
46.
Thapar, A., Langley, K., Fowler, T., Rice, F., Turic, D., Whittinger, N., et al. (2005). Catechol O-methyltransferase gene variant and birth weight predict early-onset antisocial behavior in children with attentiondeficit/hyperactivity disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry,62, 1275-1278.
47.
Van Schoiack-Edstrom, L., Frey, K., & Beland, K. (2002). Changing adolescents' attitudes about relational and physical aggression: An early evaluation of a school-based intervention . School Psychology Review, 31, 201-216.
48.
Wilson, D., Gottfredson, D., & Najaka, S. (2001). School-based prevention of problem behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of QuantitativeCriminology, 17, 247-272.
49.
Wilson, S., Lipsey, M., & Derzon, J. (2003). The effects of school-based intervention programs on aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 136-149.
