The latest evolutionary phase of criminal sentencing is a return to determinate sentencing structures. However, the concurrent application of sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum statutes in various jurisdictions often distorts and convolutes evaluations of such interventions’ effectiveness. To remedy this problem, the effects of such distinct reforms must be separated from one another. Previous research has been unsuccessful in accomplishing this task. The authors attempt to remedy this deficiency by using 1997-1998 federal sentencing data to isolate the effects of the minima from those of the guidelines and assessing how the predictors and conditioners of sentencing outcomes vary between them. The authors find several significant and some unexpected differences in the effect of predictors across models of incarceration and sentence length for the two intervention types.
Albonetti, C. A. (1986). Criminality, prosecutorial screening, and uncertainty: Theory of discretionary decision-making in felony. Criminology, 24, 623-644.
2.
Albonetti, C. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38, 247-266.
3.
Albonetti, C. A. (1997). Sentencing under the federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses. Law and Society Review, 31(4), 789-822.
4.
Albonetti, C. A. (1998). The role of gender and departures in the sentencing of defendants convicted of a white-collar offense under the federal sentencing guidelines. In J. T. Ulmer (Ed.), Sociology of crime, law, and deviance (vol. 1, pp. 3-47). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5.
Blumstein, A. (1982). On the racial disproportionality of United States’ prison populations. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 73, 1259-1281.
6.
Bridges, G., & Steen, S. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63(4), 554-570.
7.
Bureau of Justice Assistance. (1998). 1996 national survey of state sentencing structures (No. 169270). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice/Bureau of Justice Assistance.
8.
Bushway, S. D., & Piehl, A. M. (2001). Judging judicial discretion: Legal factors and racial discrimination in sentencing. Law & Society Review, 35(4), 733-764.
9.
Caulkins, J. P., Rydell, C. P., Scwhabe, W. L., & Chiesa, J. (1997). Mandatory minimum drug sentences: Throwing away the key or taxpayers’ money?Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
10.
Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1261-1293.
11.
Crawford, C. (2000). Gender, race, and habitual offender sentencing in Florida. Criminology, 38(1), 263-279.
12.
Crawford, C., Chiricos, T., & Kleck, G. (1998). Race, racial threat, and sentencing of habitual offenders. Criminology, 36(3), 481-512.
13.
Daly, K. (1987). Structure and practice of familial-based justice in a criminal court. Law and Society Review, 21, 267-290.
14.
Daly, K., & Tonry, M. (1997). Gender, race and sentencing. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (vol. 22, pp. 201-252). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Doob, A. N. (1995). The United States sentencing commission guidelines: If you don’t know where you are going, you might not get there. In C. Clarkson & R. Morgan (Eds.), The politics of sentencing reform (pp. 199-250). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
16.
Dubin, J. A., & Rivers, D. (1989/1990). Selection bias in linar regression, logit and probit models. Sociological Methods and Research, 18(2 & 3), 360-390.
17.
Engen, R. L., & Gainey, R. R. (2000). Modeling the effects of legally relevant and extralegal factors under sentencing guidelines: The rules have changed. Criminology, 38(4), 1207-1230.
18.
Engen, R. L., Gainey, R. R., Crutchfield, R. D., & Weis, J. G. (2003). Discretion and disparity under sentencing guidelines: The role of departures and structured sentencing alternatives. Criminology, 41(1), 99-130.
19.
Fearn, N. E. (2005). A multilevel analysis of community effects on criminal sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 22(4), 452-487.
20.
General Accounting Office. (1992). Sentencing guidelines: Central questions remain unanswered (No. GAO/GDD 92-93). Washington, DC: General Accounting Office/Government Printing Office.
21.
Goldstein, H. (1987). Toward community oriented policing: Potential, basic requirements and threshold questions. Crime & Delinquency, 33(1), 6-30.
22.
Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
Hawkins, D. F. (1987). Beyond anomalies: Rethinking the conflict perspective on race and capital punishment. Social Forces, 65(3), 719-743.
24.
Hindelang, M. J. (1978). Race and involvement in common law personal crimes. American Sociological Review, 43, 93-109.
25.
Hirschel, J. D., Hutchinson, I. W., Dean, C. W., & Mills, A. M. (1992). Review essay on the law enforcement response to spouse abuse: Past, present and future. Justice Quarterly, 9(2), 247-283.
26.
Johnson, B. D. (2005). Contextual disparities in guidelines departures: Courtroom social context, guidelines compliance and extralegal disparities in criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43(3), 761-797.
27.
Kautt, P. (2002). Location, location, location: Interdistrict and intercircuit variation in sentencing outcomes for federal drug-trafficking offenses. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 633-671.
28.
Kautt, P., & Spohn, C. (2002). Cracking down on black drug offenders? Testing for interactions between offender race, drug type, and sentencing strategy in federal drug sentences. Justice Quarterly, 19(1), 1-35.
29.
Klepper, S., Nagin, D., & Tierney, L. (1983). Discrimination in the criminal justice system—A critical appraisal of the literature. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, S. E. Martin, & M. H. Tonry (Eds.), Research on sentencing—The search for reform (pp. 55-128). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
30.
Kovandzic, T. V. (2001). The impact of Florida’s habitual offender law on crime. Criminology, 39(1), 179-204.
31.
Kramer, J. H., Lubitz, R. L., & Kempinen, C. A. (1989). Sentencing guidelines: A quantitative comparison of sentencing policies in Minnesota, Washington, and Pennsylvania. Justice Quarterly, 6(4), 565-587.
32.
Kramer, J. H., & Ulmer, J. T. (2002). Downward departures for serious violent offenders: Local court “corrections” to Pennsylvania’s sentencing guidelines. Criminology, 40(4), 897-932.
33.
Miethe, T. D., & Moore, C. A. (1985). Socioeconomic disparities under determinate sentencing systems: A comparison of preguideline and postguideline practices in Minnesota. Criminology, 23(2), 337-363.
34.
Mirande, A. (1987). Gringo justice. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
35.
Mitchell, O., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2005). Relationship between race, ethnicity, and sentencing outcomes: A meta-analysis of sentencing research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
36.
Moore, C. A., & Miethe, T. D. (1986). Regulated and unregulated sentencing decisions: An analysis of first year practices under Minnesota’s felony sentencing guidelines. Law and Society Review, 20(2), 253-277.
37.
Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2004). The impact of sentencing guidelines on state-level sanctions: An analysis over time. Crime & Delinquency, 50(3), 395-411.
38.
Parent, D., Dunworth, T., McDonald, D., & Rhodes, W. (1997). Key legislative issues in criminal justice: Mandatory sentencing: Research in action. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
39.
Parker, K. F., & Maggard, S. R. (2005). Structural theories and race-specific drug arrests: What structural factors account for the rise in race-specific drug arrests over time?Crime & Delinquency, 51(4), 521-547.
40.
Pasko, L. (2002). Villain or victim: Regional variation and ethnic disparity in federal drug offense sentencing. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 13(4), 307-328.
41.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859-866.
42.
Rodriguez, N. (2003). Impact of “strikes” in sentencing decisions: Punishment for only some habitual offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 14(1), 106-127.
43.
Rottman, D. B., Flango, C. R., Cantrell, M. T., Hansen, R., & LaFountain, N. (2000). State court organization, 1998. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
44.
Schlesinger, T. (2005). Racial and ethnic disparity in pretrial criminal processing. Justice Quarterly, 22(2), 170-192.
45.
Schulhofer, S. J. (1992). Assessing the federal sentencing process: The problem is uniformity not disparity. American Criminal Law Review, 28(833), 833-873.
46.
Shichor, D. (1997). Three strikes as public policy: The convergence of the new penology and the Mcdonaldization of punishment. Crime & Delinquency, 43(4), 470-492.
47.
Spohn, C., Gruhl, J., & Welch, S. (1981-1982). The effects of race on sentencing: A re-examination of an unsettled question. Law and Society Review, 16(1), 71-88.
48.
Steen, S., Engen, R. L., & Gainey, R. R. (2005). Images of danger and culpability: Racial stereotyping, case processing and criminal sentencing. Criminology, 43(2), 435-467.
49.
Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly?American Sociological Review, 65(5), 705-729.
50.
Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2001). Ethnicity and judges’ sentencing decisions: Hispanic-Black-White comparisons. Criminology, 39(1), 145-178.
51.
Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763-798.
52.
Stolzenberg, L., & D’Alessio, S. J. (1994). Sentencing and unwarranted disparity: An empirical assessment of the long term impact of sentencing guidelines in Minnesota. Criminology, 32(2), 301-310.
53.
Stolzenberg, L., & D’Alessio, S. J. (1997). Three strike and you’re out: The impact of California’s new mandatory sentencing law on serious crime rates. Crime & Delinquency, 43(4), 457-469.
54.
Tonry, M. (1995). Malign neglect. New York: Oxford University Press.
55.
Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
Uhlman, T. M., & Walker, N. D. (1980). He takes some of my time; I take some of his: An analysis of judicial sentencing patterns in jury cases. Law and Society Review, 14(2), 323-339.
57.
Ulmer, J. T. (1997). Social worlds of sentencing: Court communities under sentencing guidelines. Albany: State University of New York Press.
58.
Ulmer, J. T., & Johnson, B. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42(1), 137-177.
59.
Ulmer, J. T., & Kramer, J. H. (1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality. Criminology, 34(3), 383-408.
60.
Ulmer, J. T., & Kramer, J. H. (1998). The use and transformation of formal decision-making criteria: Sentencing guidelines, organizational contexts and case processing strategies. Social Problems, 45(2), 248-267.
61.
U. S. Sentencing Commission. (1991). Special report to congress: Mandatory minimum penalties in the federal criminal justice system. Washington, DC: Author.
62.
U. S. Sentencing Commission. (1997). Special report to congress: Cocaine and federal sentencing policy. Washington, DC: Author.
63.
Vincent, B. S., & Hofer, P. J. (1994). The consequences of mandatory minimum prison terms: A summary of recent findings. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
64.
Walker, S. (1993). Taming the system: The control of discretion in criminal justice, 1950-1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
Wheeler, S., Mann, K., & Sarat, A. (1988). Sitting in judgement: The sentencing of white-collar criminals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
66.
Wilmot, K. A., & Spohn, C. (2004). Prosecutorial discretion and real-offense sentencing: An analysis of relevant conduct under the federal sentencing guidelines. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15(3), 324-343.
67.
Worrall, J. L. (2004). Effect of three-strikes legislation on serious crime in California. Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(4), 283-296.
68.
Wray, H. R. (1993). Mandatory minimum sentences: Are they being imposed and who is receiving them?Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
69.
Zatz, M. S., & Hagan, J. (1985). Crime, time, and punishment: An exploration of selection bias in sentencing research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 1(1), 103-126.
