Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Elder abuse is recognized as an underdetected and an underreported social problem. Difficulties in detecting elder abuse are compounded by lack of a standardized, psychometrically valid instrument for case finding. The authors examined the construct validity of the 15-item Hwalek- Sengstock Elder Abuse Screening Test (H-S/EAST). Nine items were found to discriminate significantly among three groups: (a) elders whose reported abuse was substantiated by adult protective services (APS) case workers, (b) elders whose reported abuse was not substantiated by APS workers, and (c) a community-based comparison group. The data suggest that this short, easy-to-administer screening device can be useful to service providers interested in identifying people at high risk of the need for protective services.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Public Welfare Association and National Association of State Units on Aging. (1986). A comprehensive analysis of state policy and practice related to elder abuse: A focus on legislation, appropriations, incidence data and special studies Washington, DC: Author.

deSouza, J. , Hillman, S. , Hwalek, M.A. , & Sengstock, M.C. (1986, October). Validation of the Hwalek-Sengstock Elder Abuse Screening Protocol

Paper presented at the 39th annual meeting of the Gerontological Society of America

Chicago.

Ferguson, D. , & Beck, C. (1983, September-October). H.A.L.F. — A tool to assess elder abuse in the family. Geriatric Nursing , pp. 301-304.

Filinson, R. (1989). Introduction. In R. Filinson & S. R. Ingman (Eds.), Elder abuse: Practice and policy (pp. 17-34). New York: Human Sciences Press.

Hwalek, M.A. , & Sengstock, M.C. (1986). Assessing the probability of abuse of the elderly: Toward development of a clinical screening instrument Journal of Applied Gerontology, 5, 153-173.

Kosberg, J.I. (1988). Preventing elder abuse: Identification of high risk factors prior to placement decisions Gerontologist , 28, 43-50.

Magnusson, D. (1967). Test theory Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Pillemer, K.A. , & Finkelhor, D. (1988). The prevalence of elder abuse: A random sample survey Gerontologist, 28, 51-57.

Quinn, M.J. , & Tomita, S.K. (1986). Elder abuse and neglect New York: Springer.

10.

Sengstock, M.C. , & Hwalek, M.A. (1986). A comprehensive index for assessing abuse and neglect of the elderly. In M. Galbraith (Ed.), Elder abuse: Perspectives on an emerging crisis (pp. 41-64). Kansas City, KA: Mid-America Congress on Aging.

11.

SPEC Associates. (1987). Final report: Evaluation of four elder abuse demonstration projects of the Illinois Department on Aging Detroit: Social Program Evaluators and Consultants, Inc.

12.

SPSS, Inc. (1988). SPSS-X user's guide (3rded.). Chicago, IL: Author.

13.

Tatara, T. (1989). Toward the development of estimates of the national incidence of reports of elder abuse based on currently available state data: An exploratory study In R. Filinson & S. R. Ingman (Eds.), Elder abuse: Practice and policy (pp. 153-165). New York: Human Sciences Press.

14.

U.S. Congress. House Select Committee on Aging. ( 1980). Elder abuse (Report No. 96-261). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 204663)

Validation of the Hwalek-Sengstock Elder Abuse Screening Test

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References