This study examined the reciprocal relationships between digital engagement and successful aging among 4,319 Chinese older adults aged 60 to 75, using four waves (2016–2023) of the China Longitudinal Aging Social Survey. Cross-lagged panel models showed that digital engagement positively predicted successful aging in earlier waves (β = 0.144–0.158, p < .001), but the effect weakened and reversed in later waves (β = −0.028, p < .05). Successful aging consistently predicted higher levels of digital engagement (β = 0.046–0.082, p < .001). These reciprocal associations were stronger among women and urban residents. The full model accounted for 45.5% of the variance in successful aging and 49.9% in digital engagement. Findings suggest that moderate digital engagement supports aging outcomes, whereas excessive or prolonged engagement may reduce its benefits. Interventions should encourage balanced digital participation and address gender and urban–rural disparities to promote successful aging.
BerkowskyR. W.SharitJ.CzajaS. J. (2017). Factors predicting decisions about technology adoption among older adults. Innovation in aging, 1(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igy002
2.
BerryD.WilloughbyM. T. (2017). On the practical interpretability of cross-lagged panel models: Rethinking a developmental workhorse. Child Development, 88(4), 1186–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12660
3.
ChenK.ChanA. H. S. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57(5), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.895855
4.
ChoiE. Y.WisniewskiK. M.ZelinskiE. M. (2021). Information and communication technology use in older adults: A unidirectional or bi-directional association with cognitive function?Computers in Human Behavior, 121, 106813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106813
5.
ChoiN. G.DinittoD. M. (2013). Internet use among older adults: Association with health needs, psychological capital, and social capital. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5), Article e97. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2333
6.
ChopikW. J. (2016). The benefits of social technology use among older adults are mediated by reduced loneliness. Cyberpsychology. Behavior and Social Networking, 19(9), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0151
ColeD. A.MaxwellS. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558
10.
CuiM.JiaoD.LiuY.ZhuY.LiX.ZhuZ.ZhangJ.AlponaA. B.WangY.QianM.SawadaY.MiuraK. W.WatanabeT.TanakaE.AnmeT. (2024). Longitudinal assessment of the relationship between frailty and social relationships among japanese older adults: A random intercept cross-lagged panel model. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 706. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18234-1
11.
DengS. Y.ZhaoI. Y.HoM.-H.SaravanakumarP.MolassiotisA.MontayreJ. (2022). Rural-urban disparities in healthy aging: Evidence from a national study in China. Collegian, 29(6), 843–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2022.06.008
12.
GuoZ.BalmerL.ZhengY.ZhuY.WangH.GengJ.LiuH.MaP.LiX. (2025). Restricted social engagement is associated with depressive symptoms in older Chinese adults: A nationwide cross-sectional study. Health Science Reports, 8(1), Article e71262. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.71262
13.
HaoH.DuM.YueJ. (2024). Social isolation, loneliness, and subjective wellbeing among Chinese older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1425575. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1425575
14.
HeoJ.ChunS.LeeS.LeeK. H.KimJ. (2015). Internet use and well-being in older adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(5), 268–272. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0549
15.
HongJ. W.NamY. J.HongS.RohH. W. (2023). Mediating effect of depressive symptoms on the relationship between digital literacy and cognitive function in older adults. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1248347. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1248347
16.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
17.
IencaM.SchnebleC.KressigR. W.WangmoT. (2021). Digital health interventions for healthy aging: A qualitative user evaluation and ethical assessment. BMC Geriatrics, 21(1), 412. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02338-z
18.
JinY.JingM.MaX. (2019). Effects of digital device ownership on cognitive decline in a middle-aged and elderly population: Longitudinal observational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(7), 14210. https://doi.org/10.2196/14210
19.
KennyD. A.HarackiewiczJ. M. (1979). Cross-lagged panel correlation: Practice and promise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.372
20.
KimY. K.HanS. H. (2022). Internet use and cognitive functioning in later life: Focus on asymmetric effects and contextual factors. The Gerontologist, 62(3), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab149
21.
KuoppamäkiS.HänninenR.TaipaleS. (2022). Enhancing older adults’ digital inclusion through social support: A qualitative interview study. In PanayiotaT. (Ed.), Vulnerable people and digital inclusion: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 211–230). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94122-2_11
22.
LiN.KirkupG. (2007). Gender and cultural differences in internet use: A study of China and the UK. Computers & Education, 48(2), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.007
23.
LittleT. D.PreacherK. J.SeligJ. P.CardN. A. (2007). New developments in latent variable panel analyses of longitudinal data. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407077757
24.
LiuS.ZhaoH.FuJ.KongD.ZhongZ.HongY.TanJ.LuoY. (2022). Current status and influencing factors of digital health literacy among community-dwelling older adults in southwest China: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 996. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13378-4
25.
LucasR. E. (2023). Why the cross-lagged panel model is almost never the right choice. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1), 25152459231158378. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231158378
26.
LythreatisS.SinghS. K.El-KassarA.-N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359
27.
MarshE.Perez VallejosE.SpenceA. (2024). Overloaded by information or worried about missing out on it: A quantitative study of stress, burnout, and mental health implications in the digital workplace. SAGE Open, 14(3), 21582440241268830. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241268830
28.
National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2025). Statistical communiqué of the People'S Republic of China on the 2024 national economic and social development. National Bureau of Statistics.
29.
ÖzsungurF. (2022). A research on the effects of successful aging on the acceptance and use of technology of the elderly. Assistive Technology, 34(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2019.1691085
SchroederT.DoddsL.GeorgiouA.GewaldH.SietteJ. (2023). Older adults and new technology: Mapping review of the factors associated with older adults’ intention to adopt digital technologies. JMIR Aging, 6(1), 44564. https://doi.org/10.2196/44564
33.
SeligJ. P.LittleT. D. (2012). Autoregressive and cross-lagged panel analysis for longitudinal data. In LaursenB.LittleT. D.CardN. A. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 265–278). The Guilford Press.
34.
ShangX.LiuZ.GongC.HuZ.WuY.WangC. (2024). Knowledge mapping and evolution of research on older adults’ technology acceptance: A bibliometric study from 2013 to 2023. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03658-2
35.
ShiY.MaD.ZhangJ.ChenB. (2023). In the digital age: A systematic literature review of the e-health literacy and influencing factors among Chinese older adults. Journal of Public Health, 31(5), 679–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-021-01604-z
TurcasN. V.AndersonJ. A. E.WestR. L. (2025). Adaptive technologies for aging populations. In SottilareR. A.SchwarzJ. (Eds.), Adaptive instructional systems (pp. 115–131). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-92970-0_9
38.
WanX.LighthallN. R.PaulsonD. (2022). Subjective markers of successful aging and change in internet use among older adults: The distinctive role of subjective health. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107064
39.
WuM.XueY.MaC. (2025). The association between the digital divide and health inequalities among older adults in China: Nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27(1), 62645. https://doi.org/10.2196/62645
40.
XueZ.LiuC. (2024). The effect of internet use on the health of middle-aged and older adults: Evidences from China general social survey. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 2949. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20313-2
41.
YangH.ChenH.PanT.LinY.ZhangY.ChenH. (2022). Studies on the digital inclusion among older adults and the quality of life—A Nanjing example in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 811959. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.811959
42.
YaoY.ZhangH.LiuX.LiuX.ChuT.ZengY. (2021). Bridging the digital divide between old and young people in China: Challenges and opportunities. The Lancet Healthy Longevity, 2(3), e125–e126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00032-5
43.
ZhangS.DongS.YuZ.BiS.WenW.LiJ. (2025). Internet usage, social participation, and depression symptoms among middle-aged and older adult Chinese individuals before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27(1), Article e67039. https://doi.org/10.2196/67039
