Although physical activity has wide ranging benefits, most older adults do not meet recommended physical activity guidelines.
Objectives
This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of a digital exercise program, the Fittle Senior System (FSS), designed to provide behavior-change programs to increase engagement in physical activity and foster social interaction.
Methods
The sample included 181 adults aged 60–95 years, with an average age of 70.1 years. Participants were randomized into the FSS intervention condition or a Tablet Education (TE) control condition. Measures include measures of usability, health and psychosocial outcomes, and use of the FSS system. Assessments occurred at baseline and 3- and 6- month post-randomization.
Results
Participants in both conditions experienced increased physical activity, exercise self-efficacy, health-related quality of life, decreased social isolation, and loneliness.
Conclusions
Digital exercise programs are feasible for older adults and can result in improvements in health and psychosocial outcomes.
BaghbaniS. M. G.ArabshahiM.SaatchianV. (2023). The impact of exercise interventions on perceived self-efficacy and other psychological outcomes in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 62(9), Article 102281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2023.102281
3.
BanduraA. (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Journal of Health Psychology, 13(4), 623–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449808407422
4.
BanduraA. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 154–196). Guilford Press.
BanduraA. (2005). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In PajaresF.UrdanT. (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Information Age Publishing.
7.
BergK.Wood-DauphinéeS.WilliamsJ. I.GaytonD. (1989). Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada, 41(6), 304–311. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.41.6.304
8.
BohannonR. W.KingN.GershonR. (2014). Two-Minute Walk Test (2MWT) performance by adults 18–85 years: Normative values, reliability and responsiveness. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.006
9.
BrandtJ.SpencerM.FolsteinM. (1988). The telephone interview for cognitive status. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 1(2), 111–117.
10.
BrookeJ. (1986). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In JordanP. W.ThomasB.WeerdmeesterB. A.McClellandI. L. (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis.
11.
ChaseJ. A. (2015). Interventions to increase physical activity among older adults: A meta-analysis. The Gerontologist, 55(4), 706–718. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu090
12.
CohenS.MermelsteinR.KamarckT.HobermanH. M. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R. (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and applications (pp. 73–94). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5115-0_5
13.
Costa-BritoA. R.BovoliniA.Rúa-AlonsoM.VazC.Ortega-MoránM.PagadorJ. B. (2024). Home-based exercise interventions delivered by technology in older adults: A scoping review of technological tools usage. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 181, Article 105237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmdinf.2023.105287
14.
CzajaS. J.BootW. R.CharnessN.RogersW. A. (2019). Designing for older adults Principles and creative human factors approaches (3rd ed.): CRC Press.
15.
CzajaS. J.BootW. R.CharnessN.RogersW. A.SharitJ. (2018). Improving social support for older adults through technology: Findings from the PRISM randomized controlled trial. The Gerontologist, 58(3), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw249
16.
CzajaS. J.CharnessN.RogersW. A.SharitJ.MoxleyJ. H.BootW. R. (2024). The benefits of technology for engaging aging adults: Findings from the PRISM 2.0 trial. Innovation in Aging, 8(6), igae042. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae042
17.
Della ValleC.GattiC.BriccaA.ManciniV.QipoO.MasiulisN.ChristensenJ. A.ZiaaldiniM. M.YildizerG.AminiaghdamS.CaserottiP. (2025). Effects of digital physical activity interventions on muscle mechanical function in community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity : Official Journal of the European Group for Research Into Elderly and Physical Activity, 22(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-025-00380-z
18.
DiehlM. K.WahlH.-W. (2010). Awareness of age-related change: Examination of a (mostly) unexplored concept. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65B(3), S340–S350. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp110
19.
Di MartinoG.Della ValleC.CentorbiM.BuonsensoA.FiorilliG.CalcagnoG.IulianoE.di CagnoA. (2024). Enhancing behavioural changes: A narrative review on the effectiveness of a multifactorial APP-Based intervention integrating physical activity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(2), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21020233
20.
DuH.VenkatakrishnanA.YoungbloodG. M.RamA.PirolliP. (2016). A group-based Mobile application to increase adherence in exercise and nutrition programs: A factorial design feasibility Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 4(1), Article e4. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4900
21.
EimeR. M.YoungJ. A.HarveyJ. T.CharityM. J.PayneW. R. (2013). A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for adults: Informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 10, 135. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-10-135
22.
FishlederS.Petrescu-PrahovaM.HarrisJ. R.LerouxB.BennettK.HelfrichC. D.KohnM.HannonP. (2019). Predictors of improvement in physical function in older adults in an evidence-based physical activity program (enhance fitness). Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 42(4), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000202
23.
FleigL.PompS.SchwarzerR.LippkeS. (2013). Promoting exercise maintenance: How interventions with booster sessions improve long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Rehabilitation Psychology, 58(4), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033885
24.
HawthorneG. (2006). Measuring social isolation in older adults: Development and initial validation of the friendship scale. Social Indicators Research, 77(3), 521–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-7746-y
25.
IrvineA. B.GelattV. A.SeeleyJ. R.MacfarlaneP.GauJ. M. (2013). Web-based intervention to promote physical activity by sedentary older adults: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(2), Article e19. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2158
26.
JonesC. J.RikliR. E.BeamW. C. (1999). A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1999.10608028
27.
JurcaR.JacksonA. S.LaMonteM. J.MorrowJ. R.BlairS. N.WarehamN. J.HaskellW. L.van MechelenW.ChurchT. S.JakicicJ. M.LaukkanenR. (2005). Assessing cardiorespiratory fitness without performing exercise testing. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29(3), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.06.004
28.
KilgourA. H. M.RutherfordM.HigsonJ.MeredithS. J.McNiffJ.MitchellS.WijayendranA.LimS. E. R.ShenkinS. D. (2024). Barriers and motivators to undertaking physical activity in adults over 70 — A systematic review of the quantitative literature. Age and Ageing, 53(4), afae080. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae112
29.
KillingbackC.TsofliosF.ClarkC. (2015). Adherence to community-based group exercise interventions in older people: A systematic review. Physiotherapy, 101, e372–e373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.03.590
30.
LiuC.ChangW.de CarvalhoI. A.SavageK. E. L.RadfordL. W.ThiyagarajanJ. A. (2017). Effects of physical exercise in older adults with reduced physical capacity: Meta-analysis of resistance exercise and multimodal exercise. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 40(4), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000249
31.
LanghammerB.BerglandA.RydwikE. (2018). The importance of physical activity exercise among older people. BioMed Research International, Article 7856823. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7856823
32.
LiuR. (2022). Statistical guideline #7: Adjust type 1 error in multiple testing. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29(2), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-022-10070-0
33.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2022). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
34.
McAuleyE.ElavskyS.MotlR. W.KonopackJ. F.HuL.MarquezD. X. (2005). Physical activity, self-efficacy, and self-esteem: Longitudinal relationships in older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(5), P268–P275. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/60.5.p268
35.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2020). Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: Opportunities for the health care system. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25663
PantonL. B.LoneyB. S.PomidorA. (2011). Exercise for older adults: Health care provider edition. U.S. Department of health and Human Services, health Resources and Services Administration. Live Oak Geriatric Education Center Consortium.
PodsiadloD.RichardsonS. (1991). The timed “up & go”: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 39(2), 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x
41.
RussellD. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2
42.
SatterthwaiteF. E. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2(6), 110–114.
43.
SelzlerA. M.RodgersW. M.BerryT. R.SticklandM. K. (2016). The importance of exercise self-efficacy for clinical outcomes in pulmonary rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 61(4), 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000106
44.
Solis-NavarroL.GismeroA.Fernández-JanéC.Torres-CastroR.Solá-MadurellM.BergéC. (2022). Effectiveness of home-based exercise delivered by digital health in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Age and Ageing, 51(11), 3. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac243
45.
Soto-BagariaL.EisS.PérezL. M.Villa-GarcíaL.de Solà-MoralesO.CarrionC.Giné-GarrigaM.InzitariM. (2023). Mobile applications to prescribe physical exercise in frail older adults: Review of the available tools in app stores. Age and Ageing, 52(12), afad227. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afad227
46.
StalveyB. T.OwsleyC.SloaneM. E.BallK. (1999). The Life Space Questionnaire: A measure of the extent of mobility of older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 18(4), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/073346489901800404
47.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2023). Physical activity guidelines for Americans midcourse report: Implementation strategies for older adults. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
48.
WareJ. E.SherbourneC. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.
49.
World Health Organization. (2005). WHO STEPS surveillance manual: The WHO STEPwise approach to chronic disease risk factor surveillance. World Health Organization.
50.
XuL.GuH.CaiX.ZhangY.HouX.YuJ.SunT. (2023). The effects of exercise for cognitive function in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 1088. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021008
