This study examined differences in access to information on health and social activities by socioeconomic position (SEP) among community-dwelling older adults in Japan. A mail survey was conducted with 4,101 adults aged ≥65 years without functional disabilities. Information-gathering frequency and sources (television, newspapers/magazines, the internet, social interactions) were assessed. Educational attainment and subjective economic status were classified into three levels. Poisson regression models with robust variance and linear regression models were used to analyse associations between SEP and information access. Older adults with higher SEP were more likely to gather information regularly, particularly through newspapers/magazines and the internet, while television and social interactions were common across all SEP levels. Those with higher education tended to use multiple information sources. These associations were more pronounced for educational attainment than for economic status. Television and social interactions may be effective channels for reaching those with lower SEP.
AshidaT.KondoN.KondoK. (2016). Social participation and the onset of functional disability by socioeconomic status and activity type: The JAGES cohort study. Preventive Medicine, 89, 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.006
2.
BarrosA. J. D.HirakataV. N. (2003). Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: An empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-21
3.
BeardJ. R.OfficerA.de CarvalhoI. A.SadanaR.PotA. M.MichelJ. P.Lloyd-SherlockP.Epping-JordanJ. E.PeetersG. M. E. E. G.MahananiW. R.ThiyagarajanJ. A.ChatterjiS. (2016). The World report on ageing and health: A policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet, 387(10033), 2145–2154. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00516-4
4.
BerkmanL. F.GlassT.BrissetteI.SeemanT. E. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 51(6), 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00065-4
CavillN.BaumanA. (2004). Changing the way people think about health-enhancing physical activity: Do mass media campaigns have a role?Journal of Sports Sciences, 22(8), 771–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410410001712467
7.
ChaudhuriS.LeT.WhiteC.ThompsonH.DemirisG. (2013). Examining health information-seeking behaviors of older adults. Computers, Informatics, Nursing: CIN, 31(11), 547–553. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ncn.0000432131.92020.42
8.
ChenI. C.PhanumartwiwathA. (2025). Bridging the gray digital divide: A cross-cultural qualitative study on digital inclusion and healthy aging in Germany, Japan, and Thailand. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 18, Article 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100218
9.
ChoiN. G.DinittoD. M. (2013). The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/internet use. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5), Article e93. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2645
10.
DeursenA. J. A. M.HelsperE. (2015). The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online?Communication and Information Technologies Annual.
11.
DsouzaJ. P.BrouckeS. V. D.PattanshettyS.DhooreW. (2022). A comparison of behavioural models explaining cervical cancer screening uptake. BMC Womens Health, 22(1), 235. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01801-2
12.
FriemelT. (2016). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538648
13.
GalobardesB.ShawM.LawlorD. A.LynchJ. W.Davey SmithG. (2006). Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023531
14.
HayashiH.TanA. S. L.KawachiI.IshikawaY.KondoK.KondoN.TsuboyaT.ViswanathK. (2020). Interpersonal diffusion of health information: Health information mavenism among people age 65 and over in Japan. Health Communication, 35(7), 804–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1593078
15.
IkedaT.SugiyamaK.AidaJ.TsuboyaT.WatabikiN.KondoK.OsakaK. (2019). Socioeconomic inequalities in low back pain among older people: The JAGES cross-sectional study. International Journal for Equity in Health, 18(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0918-1
16.
InoueT.InoueN. (2024). The future process of Japan’s population aging: A cluster analysis using small area population projection data. Population Research and Policy Review, 43(4), 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-024-09903-5
17.
KirbyB. R.LindlyO. (2024). A rapid evidence review on health literacy and health behaviors in older populations. Aging and Health Research, 4(3), Article 100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahr.2024.100195
18.
KontosE. Z.EmmonsK. M.PuleoE.ViswanathK. (2010). Communication inequalities and public health implications of adult social networking site use in the United States. Journal of Health Communication, 15(Suppl 3), 216–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.522689
19.
LevasseurM.RichardL.GauvinL.RaymondE. (2010). Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: Proposed taxonomy of social activities. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 71(12), 2141–2149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.041
20.
LindbergM. H.ChenG.OlsenJ. A.AbelsenB. (2022). Combining education and income into a socioeconomic position score for use in studies of health inequalities. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 969. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13366-8
21.
MedlockS.EslamiS.AskariM.ArtsD. L.SentD.de RooijS. E.Abu-HannaA. (2015). Health information-seeking behavior of seniors who use the internet: A survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(1), Article e10. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3749
22.
NakagomiA.IdeK.KondoK. (2025). Predictors of shifts in internet use and frequency among older adults in Japan before and in later stages of COVID-19: A longitudinal panel study. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241313328
23.
NemotoY.SakuraiR.MatsunagaH.FujiwaraY. (2021). Information tools commonly used during a natural disaster among information and communication technology device users. [Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi] Japanese Journal of Public Health, 68(12), 888–898. https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.21-023
24.
NeterE.BraininE. (2012). eHealth literacy: Extending the digital divide to the realm of health information. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(1), Article e19. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1619
RudnickaE.NapierałaP.PodfigurnaA.MęczekalskiB.SmolarczykR.GrymowiczM. (2020). The World Health Organization (WHO) approach to healthy ageing. Maturitas, 139, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.05.018
27.
SaitoJ.HasedaM.AmemiyaA.TakagiD.KondoK.KondoN. (2019). Community-based care for healthy ageing: Lessons from Japan. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 97(8), 570–574. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.18.223057
28.
SaitoM.AidaJ.KondoN.SaitoJ.KatoH.OtaY.AmemiyaA.KondoK. (2019). Reduced long-term care cost by social participation among older Japanese adults: A prospective follow-up study in JAGES. BMJ Open, 9(3), Article e024439. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024439
29.
SørensenK.Van den BrouckeS.FullamJ.DoyleG.PelikanJ.SlonskaZ.BrandH.HLS-EU Consortium Health Literacy Project European. (2012). Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health, 12, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-80
30.
SukaM.OdajimaT.OkamotoM.SumitaniM.IgarashiA.IshikawaH.KusamaM.YamamotoM.NakayamaT.SugimoriH. (2015). Relationship between health literacy, health information access, health behavior, and health status in Japanese people. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(5), 660–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.02.013
31.
TaoS.SunS.WuS.PengT.CaoL.YanM.MaJ.LiH. (2023). Current status and influencing factors of health literacy among older adults in combined medical and nursing care institutions: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, Article 1323335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1323335
32.
TownsendB. G.ChenJ. T.WuthrichV. M. (2021). Barriers and facilitators to social participation in older adults: A systematic literature review. Clinical Gerontologist, 44(4), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2020.1863890
33.
van BuurenS.Groothuis-OudshoornK. (2011). Mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
34.
ViswanathK.AckersonL. K. (2011). Race, ethnicity, language, social class, and health communication inequalities: A nationally-representative cross-sectional study. PLoS One, 6(1), Article e14550. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014550
WangH.SunX.WangR.YangY.WangY. (2022). The impact of media use on disparities in physical and mental health among the older people: An empirical analysis from China. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, Article 949062. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.949062
ZhangJ.YuK. F. (1998). What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA, 280(19), 1690–1691. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.19.1690
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
