To review the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the care of older adults with disabilities, identifying intervention type, target populations, and effects.
Methods
A literature search was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, CNKI, SinoMed, and Wanfang. The search period is from the establishment of databases to November 2, 2024.
Results
A total of 15 studies (13 randomized controlled trials, 1 experimental study, and 1 quasi-experimental study) were included. AI applications in the care of older adults with disabilities were categorized into three domains: rehabilitation, companionship, and reduction of caregiver burden. The study focused on cognitive impairment or dementia, those with physical functional limitations, and those in need of long-term care. The main AI technologies involved human–computer interaction, web applications, data algorithms, and robotics.
Conclusion
AI shows promise in older adults with disabilities, though further development and support are needed for better integration.
BadgeryH.ZhouYuningSiderellisA.ReadM.DaveyC. (2022). Machine Learning in Laparoscopic Surgery. In Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. Singapore: Springer.
2.
BerniniS.PanzarasaS.BarbieriM.SinforianiE.QuagliniS.TassorelliC.BottiroliS. (2021). A double-blind randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of cognitive training delivered using two different methods in mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: Preliminary report of benefits associated with the use of a computerized tool. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 33(6), 1567–1575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01665-2
3.
BickmoreT. W.SillimanR. A.NelsonK.ChengD. M.WinterM.HenaultL.Paasche-OrlowM. K. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of an automated exercise coach for older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 61(10), 1676–1683. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12449
4.
ChoiH.TakS. H. (2025). Family caregivers’ perception of pressure ulcer prevention devices and equipment for patients with cerebrovascular and spinal disease. Applied Nursing Research: ANR, 81, Article151893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151893
5.
Daynes-KearneyR.GallagherS. (2023). Online support groups for family caregivers: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, Article e46858. https://doi.org/10.2196/46858
6.
DequanterS.FobeletsM.SteenhoutI.GagnonM. P.BourbonnaisA.RahimiS.BuylR.GorusE. (2022). Determinants of technology adoption and continued use among cognitively impaired older adults: A qualitative study. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 376. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03048-w
7.
EisermannU.HaaseI.KladnyB. (2004). Computer-aided multimedia training in orthopedic rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 83(9), 670–680. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000137307.44173.5d
8.
FanP.WangZ.ZhongT. (2021). Contextual interaction combined with rehabilitation robot rehabilitation training for postoperative rehabilitation of elderly patients with limited knee joint function after internal fixation of complex fractures of the femoral condyle.Chinese Journal of Geriatric Care, 19(6), 50–53. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2671.2021.06.014
FrikA.NurgalievaL.BerndJ., & et al. (2019). Privacy and security threat models and mitigation strategies of older adults. Paper presented at the Fifteenth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2019).
11.
GalanteE.VenturiniG.FiaccadoriC. (2007). Computer-based cognitive intervention for dementia: Preliminary results of a randomized clinical trial. Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia, 29(3 Suppl B), B26–B32. https://cochranne.pubapi.xyz/central/doi/10.1002/central/CN-00649287/full.
12.
GlaunerP. (2021). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Foundations, opportunities and challenges. In GlaunerP.PlugmannP.LerzynskiG. (Eds.), Digitalization in healthcare: Implementing innovation and artificial intelligence (pp. 1–15). Springer International Publishing.
13.
GroomL. L.McCarthyM. M.StimpfelA. W.BrodyA. A. (2021). Telemedicine and telehealth in nursing homes: An integrative review. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 22(9), 1784–1801.e1787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.02.037
14.
GulerM. A.ErhanB.Yilmaz YalcinkayaE. (2020). Caregiver burden in stroke inpatients: A randomized study comparing robot-assisted gait training and conventional therapy. Acta Neurologica Belgica, 121(3), 729–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-020-01465-5
15.
GuoZ.ZhuB. (2022). Does Mobile internet use affect the loneliness of older Chinese adults? An instrumental variable quantile analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5575. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095575
16.
HagedornD. K.HolmE. (2010). Effects of traditional physical training and visual computer feedback training in frail elderly patients. A randomized intervention study. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 46(2), 159–168.
17.
HsiehH. C. (2019). Use of a gaming platform for balance training after a stroke: A randomized trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 100(4), 591–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.001
18.
KashifM.AlbalwiA. A.ZulfiqarA.BashirK.AlharbiA. A.ZaidiS. (2024). Effects of virtual reality versus motor imagery versus routine physical therapy in patients with Parkinson'S disease: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatrics, 24(1), 229. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04845-1
LeeG. J.BangH. J.LeeK. M.KongH. H.SeoH. S.OhM.BangM. (2018). A comparison of the effects between 2 computerized cognitive training programs, Bettercog and COMCOG, on elderly patients with MCI and mild dementia: A single-blind randomized controlled study. Medicine (Baltimore), 97(45), Article e13007. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000013007
21.
LiY. H.LiY. L.WeiM. Y., & et al. (2024). Innovation and challenges of artificial intelligence technology in personalized healthcare. Scientific Reports, 14(1), Article 18994. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70073-7
22.
LiangA.PirothI.RobinsonH.MacDonaldB.FisherM.NaterU. M.SkoludaN.BroadbentE. (2017). A pilot randomized trial of a companion robot for people with dementia living in the community. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 18(10), 871–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.05.019
LimJ. S. (2023). Effects of a cognitive-based intervention program using social robot PIO on cognitive function, depression, loneliness, and quality of life of older adults living alone. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1097485. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1097485
25.
Lopez SeguiF.de San PedroM.Aumatell VergesE., & et al. (2019). An intergenerational information and communications technology learning Project to improve digital skills: User satisfaction evaluation. JMIR Aging, 2(2), Article e13939. https://doi.org/10.2196/13939
26.
LuS.ZhongH.FengY.NingM.FrikA.NurgalievaL.BerndJ.LeeJ. S.SchaubF.EgelmanS. (2025). How long-term care insurance can alleviate the plight of“one person’s incapacity,the whole family’s imbalance”:from the perspective ofRural adult children’s labor supply. Chinese Rural Economy, (01), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.20077/j.cnki.11-1262/f.2025.01.006
27.
MaB.YangJ.WongF. K. Y.WongA. K. C.MaT.MengJ.ZhaoY.WangY.LuQ. (2023). Artificial intelligence in elderly healthcare: A scoping review. Ageing Research Reviews, 83, Article 101808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2022.101808
28.
MannheimI.KöttlH. (2024). Ageism and (Successful) digital engagement: A proposed theoretical model. The Gerontologist, 64(9), gnae078. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae078
29.
MaslejN.FattoriniL.PerraultR., & et al. (2025). Artificial intelligence index report 2025. Retrieved from. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.07139
30.
MihailidisA.BogerJ. N.CraigT.HoeyJ. (2008). The COACH prompting system to assist older adults with dementia through handwashing: An efficacy study. BMC Geriatrics, 8(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-8-28
31.
NicoraG.ParimbelliE.MauroM. C.FalchiniF.GermanottaM.FasanoA.SgandurraG.BeaniE.GruppioniE.BuganéF.AprileI. G.QuagliniS.Mission 1 Fit4MedRob Consortium. (2025). Healthcare practitioners and robotic-assisted rehabilitation: Understanding needs and barriers. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 22(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01593-0
PeekS. T. M.WoutersE. J. M.van HoofJ.LuijkxK. G.BoeijeH. R.VrijhoefH. J. M. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
34.
PelosiA. D.RothN.YehoshuaT.ItahD.Braun BenyaminO.DahanA. (2024). Personalized rehabilitation approach for reaching movement using reinforcement learning. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 17675. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64514-6
35.
PengX.SongL.MaoZ. (2018). A study on issues linked to China’s disabled elderly —— with focus on the disability assessment tools in China’s long-term care service. Journal of Xinjiang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 39(05), 102–118+102. https://doi.org/10.14100/j.cnki.65-1039/g4.20180408.001
36.
PradhanA.LazarA.FindlaterL. (2020). Use of intelligent voice assistants by older adults with low technology use. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 27(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373759
37.
ReddyR. K.PooniR.ZaharievaD. P.SenfB.El YoussefJ.DassauE.Doyle IiiF. J.ClementsM. A.RickelsM. R.PattonS. R.CastleJ. R.RiddellM. C.JacobsP. G. (2018). Accuracy of wrist-worn activity monitors during common daily physical activities and types of structured exercise: Evaluation study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 6(12), Article e10338. https://doi.org/10.2196/10338
38.
ReyesE. P. G.WaycottJ.KellyR.BuchananG. (2023). Understanding older adults’ experiences with technologies for health self-management: Interview study. JMIR Aging, 6, Article e43197. https://doi.org/10.2196/43197
39.
RussellS.NorvigP. (2002). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Prentice Hall.
40.
SharmaA.LinI. W.MinerA. S.AtkinsD. C.AlthoffT. (2023). Human–AI collaboration enables more empathic conversations in text-based peer-to-peer mental health support. Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00593-2
41.
ŠolcováJ.ZaťkováT. Š.FrantaA., et al. (2025). Enhancing old age: Smart and welfare technologies use among older adults. TEM Journal, 14(1), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem141-13
42.
StevensF. C. J.KronemanM. W.van der ZeeJ. (2017). Health-care delivery systems. In QuahS. R. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public health (2nd ed., pp. 500–507). Academic Press.
43.
ThiengwittayapornS.WattanapreechanonP.SakonP.PeethongA.RatisoontornN.CharoenphandhuN.CharoensiriwathS. (2023). Development of a mobile application to improve exercise accuracy and quality of life in knee osteoarthritis patients: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 143(2), 729–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04149-8
TriccoA. C.LillieE.ZarinW.O'BrienK. K.ColquhounH.LevacD.MoherD.PetersM. D. J.HorsleyT.WeeksL.HempelS.AklE. A.ChangC.McGowanJ.StewartL.HartlingL.AldcroftA.WilsonM. G.GarrittyC.StrausS. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850
46.
van KesselR.HrzicR.O'NuallainE.WeirE.WongB. L. H.AndersonM.Baron-CohenS.MossialosE. (2022). Digital health paradox: International policy perspectives to address increased health inequalities for people living with disabilities. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(2), Article e33819. https://doi.org/10.2196/33819
47.
VanovaM.IrazokiE.García-CasalJ. A.Martínez-AbadF.BotellaC.ShiellsK. R.Franco-MartínM. A. (2018). The effectiveness of ICT-based neurocognitive and psychosocial rehabilitation programmes in people with mild dementia and mild cognitive impairment using GRADIOR and ehcoBUTLER: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 19(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2371-z
48.
VergheseJ.MahoneyJ. R.AyersE.AmbroseA.WangC.HoltzerR. (2021). Computerised cognitive remediation to enhance mobility in older adults: A single-blind, single-centre, randomised trial. The Lancet. Healthy Longevity, 2(9), e571–e579. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2666-7568(21)00173-2
49.
WangJ.WangY.CaiH.ZhangJ.PanB.BaoG.GuoT. (2020). Analysis of the status quo of the Elderly's demands of medical and elderly care combination in the underdeveloped regions of Western China and its influencing factors: A case study of Lanzhou. BMC Geriatrics, 20(1), 338. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01616-6
50.
WangZ. (2025). The high-quality development of domestic service industry can better meet the needs of people’s livelihood. People’s Tribune, (04), 38–41.
YangT.LiW.LuN., & et al. (2024). Virtual reality motor sensing exercise in the elderly patients with dementia:a scoping review. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 59(17), 2166–2172. https://doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2024.17.017
54.
YaoY.ZhangH.LiuX.ChuT.ZengY. (2021). Bridging the digital divide between old and young people in China: Challenges and opportunities. The Lancet. Healthy Longevity, 2(3), e125–e126. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2666-7568(21)00032-5
55.
ZengY.Hans. (2023). Quantitative research on the policy text of the intelligent technology application for the elderly from the perspective of policy tools in China. Information and Documentation Service, 44(02), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.12154/j.qbzlgz.2023.02.008
56.
ZhangX.YangL.WangN. (2024). Analysis of the challenges of cancer screening in rural areas of China and the assistance of artificial intelligence. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 40(01), 114–117. https://doi.org/10.11847/zgggws1142206
