Creating videos tailored to the specific needs of target populations can enhance the effectiveness of health communication. However, there is limited research exploring the needs of older adults in relation to health educational short videos. Therefore, this study investigated the preferences of older adults in China for health science popularization short videos through an online questionnaire and discrete choice experiment (DCE) involving 108 respondents. Results indicated that older adults preferred videos presented as personal commentary, video clips, or other formats such as animations, with a duration of around 120 seconds and content that was simple and easy to understand. They expressed less interest in videos produced by profit-driven media, with a duration of 30 seconds, and content not closely aligned with their needs. Interaction analysis indicated that participants with higher education preferred videos that were low-cost and easy to understand, and showed a lower preference for videos with platform certification.
BarbourJ. B.RintamakiL. S.RamseyJ. A.BrashersD. E. (2012). Avoiding health information. Journal of Health Communication, 17(2), 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.585691
ChoiM.RaesideR.HyunK.PartridgeS. R.ThiagalingamA.RedfernJ. (2021). Understanding preferences for lifestyle-focused visual text messages in patients with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory disease: Discrete choice experiment. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(9), Article e26224. https://doi.org/10.2196/26224
4.
CummingsK. M.JetteA. M.RosenstockI. M. (1978). Construct validation of the health belief model. Health Education Monographs, 6(4), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817800600406
5.
de Bekker-GrobE. W.SwaitJ. D.KassahunH. T.BliemerM. C. J.JonkerM. F.VeldwijkJ.RoseJ. M.DonkersB. (2019). Are healthcare choices predictable? The impact of discrete choice experiment designs and models. Value in Health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 22(9), 1050–1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1924
6.
de Bekker-GrobE. W.DonkersB.JonkerM. F.StolkE. A. (2015). Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: A practical guide. The Patient, 8(5), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-015-0118-z
7.
ElderG. H. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspectives on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786971
8.
FangZ.LiuY.PengB. (2024). Empowering older adults: Bridging the digital divide in online health information seeking. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1748. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04312-7
9.
GilleardC.HiggsP. (2005). Contexts of ageing: Class, cohort and community.
10.
GongT.ChenG.LiuP.LaiX.RongH.MaX.FangH.LiS. (2020). Parental vaccine preferences for their children in China: A discrete choice experiment. Vaccines (Basel), 8(4), 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040687
11.
HolL.Bekker-Grobd., E. W.van DamL.DonkersB.KuipersE. J.HabbemaJ. D. F. (2010). Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: A discrete choice experiment. Br. J. Cancer Res, 102, 972–980.
12.
JiaX.PangY.LiuL. S. (2021). Online health information seeking behavior: A systematic review. Healthcare (Basel), 9(12), 1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121740
13.
JonkerM.de Bekker-GrobE.VeldwijkJ.GoossensL.BourS.Rutten-Van MolkenM. (2020). COVID-19 contact tracing apps: Predicted uptake in the Netherlands based on a discrete choice experiment. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(10), Article e20741. https://doi.org/10.2196/20741
14.
LaValleyS. A.KiviniemiM. T.Gage-BouchardE. A. (2017). Where people look for online health information. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 34(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12143
15.
LengA.MaitlandE.WangS.NicholasS.LiuR.WangJ. (2021). Individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China. Vaccine, 39(2), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.009
16.
LiuT.TsangW.HuangF.LauO. Y.ChenY.ShengJ.AkinwunmiB.ZhangC. J.MingW. K. (2021). Patients' preferences for artificial intelligence applications versus clinicians in disease diagnosis during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in China: Discrete choice experiment. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(2), Article e22841. https://doi.org/10.2196/22841
17.
LumpkinR. J.LowreyS. J.StruttonD. H.KouziC. L. (1991). Catalysts for OTC drug communication strategies: Perceptions of information source characteristics by the elderly. Health Marketing Quarterly, 8(3/4), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1300/J026v08n03_09
18.
LumpkinR. J.StruttonD. H.LimC.LowreyS. J. (1990). A shopping orientation based prescription for the treatment of OTC medication misuse among elderly. Health Marketing Quarterly, 8(1/2), 95–118.
19.
LythreatisS.SinghS. K.El-KassarA.-N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, Article 121359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359
20.
MaciasW.McMillanS. (2008). The return of the house call: The role of internet-based interactivity in bringing health information home to older adults. Health Communication, 23(1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230701805174
21.
MoorheadS. A.HazlettD. E.HarrisonL.CarrollJ. K.IrwinA.HovingC. (2013). A new dimension of health care: Systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(4), Article e85. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1933
22.
MurrayE.LoB.PollackL.DonelanK.CataniaJ.WhiteM.ZapertK.TurnerR. (2003). The impact of health information on the internet on the physician-patient relationship: Patient perceptions. Archives of Internal Medicine (Baltimore), 163(14), 1727–1733. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.14.1727
PetersY.van GrinsvenE.van de HaterdM.van LankveldD.VerbakelJ.SiersemaP. D. (2020). Individuals' preferences for esophageal cancer screening: A discrete choice experiment. Value in Health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 23(8), 1087–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2020.03.013
25.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (Eds.), Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change (pp. 1–24): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1
RenH.SunY. (2022). A study of short video exposure of older people in the context of health communication. Media, 6, 57–59.
28.
SakG.SchulzP. J. (2018). Exploring health information-seeking preferences of older adults with hypertension: Quasi-experimental design. JMIR Cardio, 2(1), Article e12. https://doi.org/10.2196/cardio.8903
29.
ScantleburyA.BoothA.HanleyB. (2017). Experiences, practices and barriers to accessing health information: A qualitative study. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 103, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.018
30.
SchiavoR. (2014). Health communication: From theory to practice, 2nd ed. Jossey-Bass.
31.
SchubertT.KernK. U.SchneiderS.BaronR. (2021). Oral or topical pain therapy-how would patients decide? A discrete choice experiment in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. Pain Practice: The Official Journal of World Institute of Pain, 21(5), 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12989
32.
ShenC.WangM. P.WanA.ViswanathK.ChanS. S. C.LamT. H. (2018). Health information exposure from information and communication technologies and its associations with health behaviors: Population-based survey. Preventive Medicine, 113, 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.05.018
33.
SoekhaiV.de Bekker-GrobE. W.EllisA. R.VassC. M. (2019). Discrete choice experiments in health economics: Past, present and future. Pharmacoeconomics, 37(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2
34.
SzinayD.CameronR.NaughtonF.WhittyJ. A.BrownJ.JonesA. (2021). Understanding uptake of digital health products: Methodology tutorial for a discrete choice experiment using the Bayesian efficient design. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(10), Article e32365. https://doi.org/10.2196/32365
35.
TurnerA. M.OsterhageK. P.TaylorJ. O.HartzlerA. L.DemirisG. (2018). A closer look at health information seeking by older adults and involved family and friends: Design considerations for health information technologies. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 2018, 1036–1045. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30815147
WollmannK.der KeylenP. V.TomandlJ.MeerpohlJ. J.SofroniouM.MaunA.Voigt-RadloffS. (2021). The information needs of internet users and their requirements for online health information-A scoping review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(8), 1904–1932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.020
38.
XiongZ.ZhangL.LiZ.XuW.ZhangY.YeT. (2021). Frequency of online health information seeking and types of information sought among the general Chinese population: Cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(12), Article e30855. https://doi.org/10.2196/30855
39.
YamashitaT.BardoA. R.LiuD.CumminsP. A. (2020). Literacy, numeracy, and health information seeking among middle-aged and older adults in the United States. Journal of Aging and Health, 32(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264318800918
40.
ZhangX.WenD.LiangJ.LeiJ. (2017). How the public uses social media wechat to obtain health information in China: A survey study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17(Suppl 2), 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-017-0470-0
41.
ZhaoY. C.ZhaoM.SongS. (2022). Online health information seeking behaviors among older adults: Systematic scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(2), Article e34790. https://doi.org/10.2196/34790
42.
ZhuC.XuX.ZhangW.ChenJ.EvansR. (2019). How health communication via tik tok makes a difference: A content analysis of tik tok accounts run by Chinese provincial health committees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010192
43.
ZimbaR.KulkarniS.BerryA.YouW.MirzayiC.WestmorelandD.WaldronL.RaneM.KochharS.RobertsonM.MarokoA.GrovC.NashD. (2020). SARS-CoV-2 testing service preferences of adults in the United States: Discrete choice experiment. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(4), e25546. https://doi.org/10.2196/25546
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
