Digital health technologies offer promising solutions for enhancing the quality of life for people with dementia, but they have some drawbacks. The aim of this scoping review was to explain the factors influencing acceptance of such technologies, by identifying and exploring the empirical support for different theoretical models. Following the PRISMA-ScR checklist, data were collected from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycInfo, and IEEE Xplore. The review explored technology acceptance in people with dementia through any model or theory including the factors that could potentially determine acceptance. Thirty-one articles were included in the review. Different perspectives, approaches, and modifications of well-known technology acceptance models and theories regarding their underlying constructs were reported in the articles selected. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and social influence, the most studied constructs, have been found to have the greatest impact on the acceptance of different technologies in people with dementia.
AndersonM. S.BankoleA.HomdeeN.MitchelB. A.ByfieldG. E.LachJ.LachJ. (2020). Behavioral interventions for Alzheimer’s management using technology: Home-based monitoring. Current Geriatrics Reports, 9(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-020-00312-y
4.
BennettB.McDonaldF.BeattieE.CarneyT.FreckeltonI.WhiteB.WillmottL. (2017). Assistive technologies for people with dementia: Ethical considerations. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 95(11), 749–755. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.187484
5.
BlokM.van IngenE.Jr.de BoerA. H.SlootmanM. (2020). The use of information and communication technologies by older people with cognitive impairments: From barriers to benefits. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, Article 106173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106173
6.
BoyleL. D.HuseboB. S.VislapuuM. (2022). Promotors and barriers to the implementation and adoption of assistive technology and telecare for people with dementia and their caregivers: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1573. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08968-2
ChenK.ChanA. H. S. (2013). Use or non-use of gerontechnology--a qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(10), 4645–4666. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10104645
9.
ChenK.LouV. W. Q.LoS. S. C. (2021). Exploring the acceptance of tablets usage for cognitive training among older people with cognitive impairments: A mixed-methods study. Applied Ergonomics, 93, Article 103381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103381
10.
ConwayA.RyanA.HarkinD.Mc CauleyC.GoodeD. (2023). A review of the factors influencing adoption of digital health applications for people living with dementia. Digital Health, 9, Article 20552076231162985. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231162985
11.
CzajaS. J.CharnessN.FiskA. D.HertzogC.NairS. N.RogersW. A.SharitJ. (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333
12.
da Costa SantosC. M.de Mattos PimentaC. A.NobreM. R. (2007). The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 15(3), 508–511. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0104-11692007000300023
13.
DavisF. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
14.
Di NapoliC.GrossoE.ErcolanoG.SantangeloG.SalvatoreE.RossiS. (2019). Assessing usability of a robotic-based AAL system: A pilot study with dementia patients. In Conference: Proceedings of the 20th workshop “from objects to agents”.
15.
DirksS.BühlerC. (2018). Assistive technologies for people with cognitive impairments – which factors influence technology acceptance? In AntonaM.StephanidisC. (Eds.), Universal access in human-computer interaction. Methods, technologies, and users. Lecture notes in computer science (10907, pp. 413–426). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92049-8_36
16.
D’OnofrioG.SancarloD.RacitiM.RussoA.RicciardiF.PresuttiV.MesserveyT.CavalloF.GuilianiF.GrecoA. (2019). MARIO project: Validation in the hospital setting. In LeoneA.CaroppoA.RescioG.DiracoG.SicilianoP. (Eds.), Ambient assisted living. ForItAAL 2018 Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering (544, pp. 385–392). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05921-7_41
17.
D’OnofrioG.SancarloD.RacitiM.ReforgiatoD.MangiacottiA.RussoA.RicciardiF.VintanzaA.CantucciF.PresuttiV.MesserveyT.NolfiS.CavalloF.BarretE.WhelanS.CaseyD.GuilianiF.GrecoA. (2019). MARIO project: Experimentation in the hospital setting. In D’OnofrioG.CasidduN.PorfirioneC.MonteriùA.CavalloF. (Eds.), Ambient assisted living. ForItAAL 2017 Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering (540, pp. 223–231). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04672-9_20
18.
DossoJ. A.BandariE.MalhotraA.GuerraG. K.HoeyJ.MichaudF.PrescottT. J.RobillardJ. M. (2022). User perspectives on emotionally aligned social robots for older adults and persons living with dementia. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering, 9, Article 20556683221108364. https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683221108364
19.
EvansN.BoydH.HarrisN.NoonanK.IngramT.JarvisA.RidgersJ.ChestonR. (2020). The experience of using prompting technology from the perspective of people with Dementia and their primary carers. Aging & Mental Health, 25(8), 1433–1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2020.1745145
20.
FanJ.BianD.ZhengZ.BeuscherL.NewhouseP. A.MionL. C.SarkarN. (2017). A robotic coach architecture for elder care (ROCARE) based on multi-user engagement models. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering: A Publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 25(8), 1153–1163. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2608791
21.
FeldingS. A.KohW. Q.TeupenS.BudakB.LaporteF.RoesM. (2023). A scoping review using the Almere model to understand factors facilitating and hindering the acceptance of social robots in nursing homes. International Journal of Social Robotics, 15(5), 1115–1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-023-01012-1
22.
GkiolntaE.RoyD.FragulisG. F. (2025). Challenges and ethical considerations in implementing assistive technologies in healthcare. Technologies, 13(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies13020048
23.
GobeilJ.PigotH.LalibertéC.DépelteauA.LaverdièreO.David-GrégoireM. A.LapriseN.BeauchampI.CoutureM.AdeliseY.BierN. (2019). Facilitating day-to-day life management of older people with alzheimer’s disease: A revelatory single-case study on the acceptability of the AMELIS interactive calendar. Gerontechnology, 18(4), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2019.18.4.006.00
24.
GrecoA.AnerdiG.RodriguezG. (2009). Acceptance of an animaloid robot as a starting point for cognitive stimulators supporting elders with cognitive impairments. Revue D'intelligence Artificielle, 23(4), 523–537. https://doi.org/10.3166/ria.23.523-537
25.
GunawardenaC. N.ZittleF. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649709526970
26.
HeartT.KalderonE. (2013). Older adults: Are they ready to adopt health-related ICT?International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(11), e209–e231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.03.002
27.
HeerinkM.KröseB.EversV.WielingaB. (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The Almere Model. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0068-5
28.
HoldenR. J.KarshB. T. (2010). The technology acceptance model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(1), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002
29.
HornB. L.AlbersE. A.MitchellL. L.JutkowitzE.FinlayJ. M.MillenbahA. N.SeifertG. J.HedinD. S.KnutsonM. J.KramerK. M.MikalJ. P. (2023). Can technology-based social memory aids improve social engagement? Perceptions of a novel memory aid for persons with memory concerns. Journal of Applied Gerontology: The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 42(3), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648221134869
30.
KarlssonE.AxelssonK.ZingmarkK.FahlanderK.SävenstedtS. (2014). Supporting conversations between individuals with dementia and their family members. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 40(2), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20130916-07
31.
KhoslaR.NguyenK.ChuM. T. (2017). Human robot engagement and acceptability in residential aged care. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 33(6), 510–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1275435
32.
LarnyoE.DaiB.LarnyoA.NutakorJ. A.Ampon-WirekoS.NkrumahE. N. K.AppiahR. (2022). Impact of actual use behavior of healthcare wearable devices on quality of life: A cross-sectional survey of people with dementia and their caregivers in Ghana. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 10(2), 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020275
33.
LauriksS.ReinersmannA.Van der RoestH. G.MeilandF. J. M.DaviesR. J.MoelaertF.MulvennaM. D.NugentC. D.DröesR.-M. (2007). Review of ICT-based services for identified unmet needs in people with dementia. Ageing Research Reviews, 6(3), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2007.07.002
34.
LeeC.CoughlinJ. F. (2015). Perspective: Older adults’ adoption of technology: An integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12176
35.
LeeC. S.YiiW. (2021). Lean rehabilitative-predictive recommender games for seniors with mild cognitive impairment: A case study. In GervasiO.MurganteB.MisraS.GarauC.BlečićI.TaniarD.ApduhanB. O.RochaA. M. A. C.TarantinoE.TorreC. M. (Eds.), Computational science and its applications – ICCSA 2021 Lecture Notes in Computer Science (12951, pp. 405–417). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86970-0_29
36.
LiuL.CruzA. M.JuzwishinD. (2018). Caregivers as a proxy for responses of dementia clients in a GPS technology acceptance study. Behaviour and Information Technology, 37(6), 634–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1470672
37.
LiuL.CruzA. M.RuptashT.BarnardS.JuzwishinD. (2017). Acceptance of global positioning system (GPS) technology among dementia clients and family caregivers. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 35(2), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2016.1266724
MarzialiE.DonahueP.CrossinG. (2005). Caring for others: Internet video-conferencing group intervention for family caregivers of older adults with neurodegenerative disease. Gerontologist, 45(6), 793–798. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/46.3.398
40.
MishraR. K.ParkC.MominA. S.RafaeiN. E.KunikM.YorkM. K.NajafiB. (2023). Care4AD: A technology-driven platform for care coordination and management: Acceptability study in dementia. Gerontology, 69(2), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1159/000526219
41.
MitznerT. L.BoronJ. B.FaussetC. B.AdamsA. E.CharnessN.CzajaS. J.DijkstraK.FiskA. D.RogersW. A.SharitJ. (2010). Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1710–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020
42.
MondelliniM.ArlatiS.GapeyevaH.LeesK.MäritzI.PizzagalliS. L.OttoT.SaccoM.Teder-BraschinskyA. (2022). User experience during an immersive virtual reality-based cognitive task: A comparison between Estonian and Italian older adults with MCI. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 22(21), 8249. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218249
43.
MorrisM. E.AdairB.MillerK.OzanneE.HansenR.PearceA. J.SantamariaN.ViegasL.LongM.SaidC. (2013). Smart-home technologies to assist older people to live well at home. Journal of Aging Science, 1(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8847.1000101
NieQ.NguyenL. T.MyersD.GibsonA.KerssensC.MudarR. A.RogersW. A. (2020). Design guidance for video chat system to support social engagement for older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment. Gerontechnology, 20(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2020.20.1.398.08
46.
OlssonA.EngströmM.SkovdahlK.LampicC. (2013). A passive positioning alarm used by persons with dementia and their spouses – a qualitative intervention study. BMC Geriatrics, 13, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-13-11
47.
OlssonA.SkovdahlK.EngströmM. (2016). Using diffusion of innovation theory to describe perceptions of a passive positioning alarm among persons with mild dementia: A repeated interview study. BMC Geriatrics, 16, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0183-8
48.
OuzzaniM.HammadyM.FedorowiczZ.ElmagarmidA. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
49.
ParkC.MishraR. K.YorkM. K.EnriquezA.LindsayA.BarchardG.VaziriA.NajafiB. (2022). Tele-medicine based and self-administered interactive exercise program (Tele-Exergame) to improve cognition in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: A feasibility, acceptability, and proof-of-concept study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), Article 16361. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316361
50.
ParkerS. J.JesselS.RichardsonJ. E.ReidM. C. (2013). Older adults are mobile too! Identifying the barriers and facilitators to older adults’ use of mHealth for pain management. BMC Geriatrics, 13(43), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-13-43
51.
PeekS. T.WoutersE. J.van HoofJ.LuijkxK. G.BoeijeH. R.VrijhoefH. J. (2014). Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83(4), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004
RenaudK. V.BiljonJ. A. (2008). Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: A qualitative study. In Research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists. https://doi.org/10.1145/1456659.1456684
54.
RobinsonL.BrittainK.LindsayS.JacksonD.OlivierP. (2009). Keeping in touch everyday (KITE) project: Developing assistive technologies with people with dementia and their carers to promote independence. International Psychogeriatrics, 21(3), 494–502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610209008448
55.
RogersE. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
56.
ShenD.NuankhieoP.HuangX.AmelungC.LaffeyJ. M. (2008). Sociability assessment in online learning environments. Behavior & Information Technology, 27(1), 31–46.
57.
SpanM.HettingaM.Vernooij-DassenM.EefstingJ.SmitsC. (2013). Involving people with dementia in the development of supportive IT applications: A systematic review. Ageing Research Reviews, 12(2), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2013.01.002
58.
ThorpeJ. R.Rønn-AndersenK. V.BieńP.ÖzkilA. G.ForchhammerB. H.MaierA. M. (2016). Pervasive assistive technology for people with dementia: A UCD case. Healthcare Technology Letters, 3(4), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1049/htl.2016.0057
59.
TopoP. (2009). Technology studies to meet the needs of people with dementia and their caregivers: A literature review. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28(1), 5–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464808324019
60.
TriccoA. C.LillieE.ZarinW.O'BrienK. K.ColquhounH.LevacD.MoherD.PetersM. D. J.HorsleyT.WeeksL.HempelS.AklE. A.ChangC.McGowanJ.StewartL.HartlingL.AldcroftA.WilsonM. G.GarrittyC.StrausS. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
61.
TuenaC.PedroliE.TrimarchiP. D.GallucciA.ChiappiniM.GouleneK.GaggioliA.RivaG.LattanzioF.GiuncoF.Stramba-BadialeM. (2020). Usability issues of clinical and research applications of virtual reality in older people: A systematic review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 93. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00093
62.
TurnerN. R.BerridgeC. (2023). How I want technology used in my care: Learning from documented choices of people living with dementia using a dyadic decision making tool. Informatics for Health & Social Care, 48(4), 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2023.2252066
63.
VenkateshV. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
64.
VenkateshV.DavisF. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
65.
VenkateshV.MorrisM. G.DavisG. B.DavisF. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
66.
VenkateshV.ThongJ. Y. L.XuX. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
67.
WangmoT.LippsM.KressigR. W.IencaM. (2019). Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: Findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders. BMC Medical Ethics, 20(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0437-z
68.
WernerP.GoldsteinD.KarpasD. S.ChanL.LaiC. (2014). Help-seeking for dementia: A systematic review of the literature. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 28(4), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000065
69.
WhelanS.MurphyK.BarrettE.KruscheC.SantorelliA.CaseyD. (2018). Factors affecting the acceptability of social robots by older adults including people with dementia or cognitive impairment: A literature review. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(5), 643–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0471-x
70.
YamatoN.SumiokaH.IshiguroH.ShiomiM.KohdaY. (2023). Technology acceptance models from different viewpoints of caregiver, receiver, and care facility administrator: Lessons from long-term implementation using baby-like interactive robot for nursing home residents with dementia. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 41(4), 296–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2023.2292058
71.
YaoR.ZhangW.EvansR.CaoG.RuiT.ShenL. (2022). Inequities in health care services caused by the adoption of digital health technologies: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(3), Article e34144. https://doi.org/10.2196/34144
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
