Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
Intergenerational Contact and Older Employees’ Knowledge Sharing: Mediating Effect of Organization-Based Self-Esteem and the Moderating Effect of Age-Inclusive HR Practices
Based on social identity theory, this study investigated the impact of intergenerational contact quality on older employees’ knowledge sharing with younger coworkers. The empirical findings, based on a sample of 337 matched older employee-younger coworker pairs, revealed that intergenerational contact quality has a significant positive effect on older employees’ knowledge sharing with younger coworkers. Furthermore, organization-based self-esteem (OBSE) was identified as a partial mediator in the relationship between intergenerational contact quality and older employees’ knowledge sharing with younger coworkers. Additionally, age-inclusive HR practices were found to negatively moderate the relationship between intergenerational contact quality and OBSE. These findings contribute to the existing literature on intergenerational contact and knowledge management, offering valuable practical implications for fostering intergenerational knowledge sharing within organizations.
BaoG.XuB.ZhangZ. (2016). Employees’ trust and their knowledge sharing and integration: The mediating roles of organizational identification and organization-based self-esteem. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 14(3), 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2015.1
3.
BockG. W.KimY.-G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2002040102
4.
BoehmS. A.KunzeF.BruchH. (2014). Spotlight on age‐diversity climate: The impact of age‐inclusive HR practices on firm‐level outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 667–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12047
5.
BowlingN. A.EschlemanK. J.WangQ.KirkendallC.AlarconG. (2010). A meta-analysis of the predictors and consequences of organization-based self-esteem. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X454382
6.
BriegerS. A. (2019). Social identity and environmental concern: The importance of contextual effects. Environment and Behavior, 51(7), 828–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518756988
BurmeisterA.DellerJ. (2016). Knowledge retention from older and retiring workers: What do we know, and where do we go from here?Work, Aging and Retirement, 2(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw002
9.
BurmeisterA.FasbenderU.DellerJ. (2018). Being perceived as a knowledge sender or knowledge receiver: A multistudy investigation of the effect of age on knowledge transfer. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(3), 518–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12208
10.
BurmeisterA.WangM.HirschiA. (2020). Understanding the motivational benefits of knowledge transfer for older and younger workers in age-diverse coworker dyads: An actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(7), 748–759. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000466
11.
CastanedaD. I.CuellarS. (2020). Knowledge sharing and innovation: A systematic review. Knowledge and Process Management, 27(3), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1637
12.
CebolaM. M. J.Dos SantosN. R.DionísioA. (2023). Worker-related ageism: A systematic review of empirical research. Ageing and Society, 43(8), 1882–1914. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X21001380
13.
CuiChengY.LiZ.TangG. (2023). Why do older workers grow “older but vigorous”? Research on the influence of work locus of control on successful aging at work. Human Resources Development of China, 40(3), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.16471/j.cnki.11-2822/c.2023.3.004
14.
DengH.DuanS. X.WibowoS. (2023). Digital technology driven knowledge sharing for job performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(2), 404–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2021-0637
FanP.SongY.FangM.ChenX. (2023). Creating an age-inclusive workplace: The impact of HR practices on employee work engagement. Journal of Management and Organization, 29(6), 1179–1197. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2023.18
17.
FasbenderU.GerpottF. H. (2021). To share or not to share: A social-cognitive internalization model to explain how age discrimination impairs older employees’ knowledge sharing with younger colleagues. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 30(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1839421
18.
FasbenderU.GerpottF. H. (2022). Knowledge transfer between younger and older employees: A temporal social comparison model. Work, Aging and Retirement, 8(2), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waab017
19.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2014). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Psychology Press.
20.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
21.
HoggM. A.TerryD. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791606
22.
IweinsC.DesmetteD.YzerbytV.StinglhamberF. (2013). Ageism at work: The impact of intergenerational contact and organizational multi-age perspective. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 22(3), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2012.748656
23.
JenkinsR. (2014). Social identity. Routledge.
24.
JiaH.LiL.LiM.WangH. (2023). Old bu vigorous: The effect of occupational future time perspective on successful aging at work. Human Resources Development of China, 40(2), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.16471/j.cnki.11-2822/c.2023.2.003
25.
KulikC. T.RyanS.HarperS.GeorgeG. (2014). Aging populations and management. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 929–935. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.4004
26.
LagacéM.DonizzettiA. R.Van De BeeckL.BergeronC. D.Rodrigues-RouleauP.St-AmourA. (2022). Testing the shielding effect of intergenerational contact against ageism in the workplace: A canadian study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8), 4866–4879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084866
27.
LagacéM.Van De BeeckL.BergeronC. D.Rodrigues-RouleauP. (2023). Fostering positive views about older workers and reducing age discrimination: A retest of the workplace intergenerational contact and knowledge sharing model. Journal of Applied Gerontology: The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 42(6), 1223–1233. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648231163840
28.
OnoratoR. S.TurnerJ. C. (2004). Fluidity in the self-concept: The shift from personal to social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.195
29.
PengX.TianX.PengX.XieJ. (2024). Age-inclusive HR practices and older workers’ voice behavior: The role of job crafting toward strengths and negative age-based metastereotypes. Personnel Review, 53(9), 2273–2292. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2022-0752
30.
PfrombeckJ.BurmeisterA.GroteG. (2024). Older workers’ knowledge seeking from younger coworkers: Disentangling countervailing pathways to successful aging at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2751
31.
PierceJ. L.GardnerD. G. (2004). Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: A review of the organization-based self-esteem literature. Journal of Management, 30(5), 591–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.10.001
32.
PierceJ. L.GardnerD. G.CummingsL. L.DunhamR. B. (1989). Organization-based self-esteem: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 622–648. https://doi.org/10.2307/256437
33.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
RudolphC. W.ZacherH. (2021). Age inclusive human resource practices, age diversity climate, and work ability: Exploring between- and within-person indirect effects. Work, Aging and Retirement, 7(4), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waaa008
36.
SwannW. B.Jr.JohnsonR. E.BossonJ. K. (2009). Identity negotiation at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.005
37.
TerryD. J.HoggM. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(8), 776–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296228002
38.
WaligóraŁ. (2024). Exploring the impact of age diversity on organizational identification: A study of HR practices and perceived age discrimination climate. Administrative Sciences, 14(10), 243. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14100243
39.
WangS.NoeR. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
