Training Needs and Preferences of the Senior Nutrition Program Network: Amplifying Historically Marginalized Voices

Abstract

The Nutrition and Aging Resource Center (NRCNA) provides the Senior Nutrition Program (SNP) network technical assistance and is dedicated to programming equity. This study aims to elevate Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) SNP professionals’ training needs and preferences by utilizing equitable evaluation practices. The objectives include (1) understanding BIPOC SNP professionals’ general characteristics and organization’s attributes, (2) identifying subject matter and training needs and preferences, and (3) contributing to equitable evaluation method literature. Snowball sampling through NRCNA and partner agencies yielded a final sample of 1910 aging professionals, with 9.9% identifying as BIPOC (n = 190). SPSS was used for data analysis with descriptive statistics, chi-square test of independence, and independent t-tests. Data disaggregation resulted in additional and unique characteristics, organizational attributes, and subject matter gaps for BIPOC respondents not identified through the collective sample. These findings can assist in creating more inclusive and supportive technical assistance and network.

Keywords

equitable evaluation data disaggregation racial equity needs assessments Senior Nutrition Program professional development continuing education Older Americans Act

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AARP . (2023). How older adults are changing America. https://www.aarp.org/politics-society/history/info-2023/older-adults-changing-america.html

Administration for Community Living . (2021). ACL awards national resource center on nutrition and aging cooperative agreement. https://acl.gov/news-and-events/announcements/acl-awards-national-resource-center-nutrition-and-aging-cooperative

Administration for Community Living . (2023a). 2023 innovations in nutrition programs and service. https://apply07.grants.gov/apply/opportunities/instructions/PKG00278558-instructions.pdf

Administration for Community Living . (2023b). Innovation in nutrition programs and services. https://acl.gov/programs/nutrition/innovations-nutrition-programs-and-services-0

Administration for Community Living . (2024a). 2024 final rule to update Older Americans Act regulations. https://acl.gov/OAArule#:∼:text=Keyprovisionsofthe2024OlderAmericansActFinalRule&text=Forexample%2Cthefinalrule,stateandtribalOAAprograms

Administration for Community Living . (2024b). Nutrition services. https://acl.gov/programs/health-wellness/nutrition-services

Akobundu

U. O.

Netterville

(2015). Meeting the training needs of aging network nutrition program professionals: Past, present, and future. Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics, 34(2), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/21551197.2015.1031593

American Evaluation Association (AEA) . (2011). American Evaluation Association statement on cultural competence in evaluation . Accessed: https://www.eval.org/About/Competencies-Standards/Cutural-Competence-Statement

Burgdorf

J. G.

Chase

J. A. D.

Whitehouse

Bowles

K. H.

(2022). Unmet caregiving needs among sepsis survivors receiving home health care: The need for caregiver training. Journal of Applied Gerontology: The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 41(10), 2180–2186. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648221104084

10.

Colello

K. J.

Napili

(2024). Older Americans act: Overview and funding. (CRS report No. R43414). Congressional Research Service. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R43414

11.

Conrique

B. G.

McDade-Montez

Anderson

P. M.

(2020). Detection and prevention of data fraud in a study of community college career technical education students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 44(9), 690–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2019.1629126

12.

Decker

(2021). Letter on leading practices to advance equity within federal agencies. Mathematica. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/letter-on-leading-practices-to-advance-equity-within-federal-agencies

13.

Equitable Evaluation Framework™ . (2023). The equitable evaluation Framework™. https://www.equitableeval.org/_files/ugd/21786c_aab47695b0d2476d8de5d32f19bd6df9.pdf

14.

Equitable Evaluation Initiative . (2024). Five years of learning, unlearning, & reimagining philanthropy together. https://www.equitableeval.org/_files/ugd/d12e85_48d051c0a34346a58e1cfeb89a9369e7.pdf

15.

Evans

Mathur

(2018). The value of online surveys: A look back and a look ahead. Internet Research, 38(4), 854–887. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-03-2018-0089

16.

French

(2017). The case for social marketing. In French

Blair-Stevens

McVey

Merritt

(Eds.), Social marketing and public health: Theory and practice. Oxford University Press. https://go.iastate.edu/MTI3VA

17.

Frey

W. H.

(2021). Mapping America’s diversity with the 2020 census. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/mapping-americas-diversity-with-the-2020-census/

18.

Gigli

K. H.

(2021). Data disaggregation: A research tool to identify health inequities. Journal of Pediatric Health Care: Official Publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners, 35(3), 322–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2020.12.002

19.

Greer

Canham

S. L.

Hong

Agutter

Garcia Zambrana

Van Natter

J. M.

(2023). Aging in place through the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives from aging service providers. Journal of Applied Gerontology: The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 42(7), 1530–1540. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648231159375

20.

Griffin

Martino

R. J.

LoSchiavo

Comer-Carruthers

Krause

K. D.

Stults

C. B.

Halkitis

P. N.

(2021). Ensuring survey research data integrity in the era of internet bots. Quality and Quantity, 56(4), 2841–2852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01252-1

21.

Guerrero

L. R.

Richter Lagha

Shim

Gans

Schickedanz

Shiner

Tan

(2020). Geriatric workforce development for the underserved: Using RCQI methodology to evaluate the training of IHSS caregivers. Journal of Applied Gerontology: The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 39(7), 770–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464818780635

22.

Guest

M. A.

Miller

M. C.

Smith

M. P.

Hyleman

(2018). Office for the study of aging at the university of South Carolina: Promoting healthy aging through program development, evaluation, education/training, and research for South Carolina’s older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology: The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 37(3), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464816643878

23.

Huang

J. L.

Curran

P. G.

Keeney

Poposki

E. M.

DeShon

R. P.

(2012). Detecting and deterring insufficient effort responding to surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9231-8

24.

Janssen

S. L.

Klug

Johnson Gusaas

Schmiesing

Nelson-Deering

Pratt

Lamborn

(2021). Community-based health promotion in occupational therapy: Assess before you assess. Journal of Applied Gerontology: The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 40(9), 1134–1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464820921320

25.

Mabli

Gearan

Cohen

Niland

Redel

Panzarella

Carlson

(2017). Evaluation of the effect of the Older Americans Act Title III-C Nutrition Services program on participants’ food security, socialization, and diet quality. Mathematica Policy Research. https://acl.gov/sites/default/files/programs/2017-07/AoA_outcomesevaluation_final.pdf

26.

Mabli

Ghosh

Schmitz

Shenk

Panzarella

Carlson

Flick

(2018). Evaluation of the effect of the Older American Act Title III-C Nutrition Services program on participants’ health care utilization. Mathematica Policy Research. https://acl.gov/sites/default/files/programs/2018-10/NSPevaluation_healthcareutilization.pdf

27.

Mancilla

Frey

(2021). Professional development for digital accessibility: A needs assessment. https://qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/research-docs-pdfs/QM-Digital-Accessibility-Professional-Development-WP.pdf

28.

Meals on Wheels America . (2021). 2021 member perspectives+practices survey. https://www.mealsonwheelsamerica.org/learn-more/research/member-perspectives-practices-survey

29.

Moyle

Murfield

Sung

Sriram

Liddle

Estai

Lion

AACT Collaborative . (2022). Consumer and provider perspectives on technologies used within aged care: An Australian qualitative needs assessment survey. Journal of Applied Gerontology: The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 41(12), 2557–2565. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648221120082

30.

Nutrition Aging Resource Center

(NRNCA).

(2024). About us. Adminstration for Community Living. Accessed: https://acl.gov/senior-nutrition/about-us

31.

Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion . (2021). Healthy aging workshop: Preparing for the future of aging. https://health.gov/sites/default/files/2023-08/ODPHPHealthyAgingWorkshopSummaryReportFINAL508c.pdf

32.

O'Shaughnessy

C. V.

(2021). Older Americans Act: The foundation of the aging services network. HCBS Clearinghouse. Accessed: https://www.advancingstates.org/hcbs/article/older-americans-act-foundation-aging-services-network

33.

Rudolph

Francis

S. L.

(2022). Making home-delivered meal programs relevant for today’s aging adult. Journal of Public Health, 30(1), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01286-z

34.

Russell

Fong

M. C.

Gao

Lowenstein

Haas

Wiggins

Brickner

Franzosa

(2022). Formative evaluation of a workforce investment organization to provide scaled training for home health aides serving managed long-term care plan clients in New York State. Journal of Applied Gerontology: The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 41(7), 1710–1721. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648221084182

35.

Schultz

Francis

S. L.

(2022). 2022 needs assessment report. Nutrition and Aging Resource Center. https://acl.gov/sites/default/files/nutrition/2022NRCNANeedsAssessmentReport10.12.2022.pdf

36.

Schultz

Francis

S. L.

Russell

Getty

Bauman

Shelley

(2021). Encore Café: An Innovative and Effective Congregate Nutrition Program. Journal of nutrition in gerontology and geriatrics, 40(4), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/21551197.2021.1986455

37.

Schultz

Francis

S. L.

Shelley

Datta

(2024). Ageism webinars: A needs-based continuing education training for the national aging network (pp. 1–16). Gerontology & Geriatrics Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2024.2340982

38.

Sharpe

R. V.

(2019). Disaggregating data by race allows for more accurate research. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(12), 1240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0696-1

39.

Sterns

H. L.

Ferraro

K. F.

(2008). The evolution of gerontology education over three decades reflections and prospects. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 8(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1891/0198-8794.28.3

40.

Trochim

(n.d.). Research methods knowledge base. https://conjointly.com/kb/

41.

US Aging . (2023). More older adults, more complex needs: Trends and new directions from the national survey of area agencies on aging. https://www.usaging.org//Files/AAA-Survey-Report-23-508.pdf

42.

U.S. Government Accountability Office . (2021). COVID-19: Selected states modified meal provision and other older Americans act services to prioritize safety. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-104425

43.

White

House.

(2022). A vision for equitable data: Recommendations from the equitable data working group. https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/eo13985-vision-for-equitable-data.pdf

44.

Wilson

T. L.

Scala-Foley

Kunkel

Brewster

A. L.

(2020). Fast-track innovation: Area agencies on aging respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 32(4-5), 432–438.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.35 MB

0.37 MB