This study aimed to provide integrated knowledge on the influence of shared reading or writing activities, that is, recreational occupations involving dynamic relationships based on personal development, on adults aged 55 and older. Using a scoping study framework, six databases were searched with 25 relevant keywords for papers, theses, and scientific reports published in 2001–2023. Based on the Human Development Model–Disability Creation Process, the content analysis of 20 documents showed that shared reading or writing activities mostly benefited aging adults’ behavioral capabilities like positive affect, their intellectual capacities, such as developing new perspectives on life, their interpersonal relationships, and social support. Negative instances, such as frustration, were often mentioned at the beginning of the activities but decreased over time. These results suggest the importance of shared reading or writing activities for healthy aging and the necessity to better support these activities for more inclusive and caring aging societies.
AbudT.KounidasG.MartinK. R.WerthM.CooperK.MyintP. K. (2022). Determinants of healthy ageing: a systematic review of contemporary literature.Aging Clin Exp Res, 34(6), 1215–1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-02049-w
3.
AlexJ. L. (2010). Older adults and a writing workshop: A phenomenological study (dissertations. 466). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi. Aquila Digital Community]. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/466
4.
Almeida-MezaP.SteptoeA.CadarD. (2021). Is engagement in intellectual and social leisure activities protective against dementia risk? Evidence from the English longitudinal study of ageing. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 80(2), 555–565. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200952
5.
AndrewM. K.KeefeJ. M. (2014). Social vulnerability from a social ecology perspective: A cohort study of older adults from the national population health survey of Canada. BMC Geriatrics, 14(1), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-90
6.
ArkseyH.O’MalleyL. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
BétriseyC.CarrierA.CardinalJ.-F.LagacéM.CohenA. A.BeaulieuM.BaillargeonD.LevasseurM. (2023). Which interventions with youths work to counter ageism toward older adults? Results from a realist review. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 45(2), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2023.2210521
9.
BirrenJ. E.DeutchmanD. E. (1991). Guiding autobiography groups for older adults: exploring the fabric of life. Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
BrownC. J.ChirinoA. F. C.CortezC. M.GearhartC.UrizarG. G. (2021). Conceptual art for the aging brain: piloting an art-based cognitive health intervention. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 45(1), 39–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2020.1719584
11.
Brown WilsonC.TetleyJ.HealeyJ.WoltonR. (2011). The best care is like sunshine: accessing older people’s experiences of living in care homes through creative writing. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 35(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2010.550482
12.
BruntA.StrommenJ.StanglC. (2020). Reinventing the traditional senior center in rural areas to attract a new generation of individuals. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 44(2), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2019.1581025
13.
ChamberlainD. (2019). The experience of older adults who participate in a bibliotherapy/poetry group in an older adult inpatient mental health assessment and treatment ward. Journal of Poetry Therapy, 32(4), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/08893675.2019.1639879
14.
ChangY.-H.WuI.-C.HsiungC. A. (2021). Reading activity prevents long-term decline in cognitive function in older people: evidence from a 14-year longitudinal study. International Psychogeriatrics, 33(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610220000812
15.
ChippendaleT.BoltzM. (2015). Living legends: effectiveness of a program to enhance sense of purpose and meaning in life among community-dwelling older adults. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2015.014894
16.
ChonodyJ.WangD. (2013). Connecting older adults to the community through multimedia: an intergenerational reminiscence program. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 37(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2012.760140
17.
CreswellJ. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd Ed.). Sage Publications.
18.
DavisL.BottingN.CruiceM.DipperL. (2022). A systematic review of language and communication intervention research delivered in groups to older adults living in care homes. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 57(1), 182–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12679
19.
de MedeirosK.MosbyA.HanleyK. B.PedrazaM. S.BrandtJ. (2011). A randomized clinical trial of a writing workshop intervention to improve autobiographical memory and well-being in older adults. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 26(8), 803–811. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.2605
DezutterO.LevasseurM.HarveyM.BierN.DebeurmeG.WatteyneN.BabinJ.LépineM. (2023). Lire, écrire ensemble: Guide pratique pour organiser et animer des activités de lecture ou d’écriture pour des personnes aînées. Collectif CLÉ.
22.
DezutterO.ThonardA.EidC. (2014). La communication écrite médiée par les technologies (CÉMT) en contexte universitaire: un défi pour les enseignants de FLE/S. Le Langage et l’homme, 49(1), 57–65.
23.
FougeyrollasP. (2021). Classification internationale ‘Modèle de développement humain-processus de production du handicap’ (MDH-PPH, 2018). Kinésithérapie, la Revue, 21(235), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kine.2021.04.003
24.
FujiwaraY.SakumaN.OhbaH.NishiM.LeeS.WatanabeN.KousaY.YoshidaH.FukayaT.YajimaS.AmanoH.KuretaY.IshiiK.UchidaH.ShinkaiS. (2009). Reprints: Effects of an intergenerational health promotion program for older adults in Japan. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 7(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770802628901
25.
GiassonJ. (1995). La lecture: De la théorie à la pratique. Gaëtan Morin.
26.
GilmourH.Ramage-MorinP. L. (2020). Isolement social et mortalité chez les personnes âgées au Canada (No 82-003-X au catalogue; rapports sur la santé, Vol. 31, pp. 29–41). Statistics Canada. https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x202000300003-fra
27.
GlassO.DreusickeM.EvansJ.BechardE.WoleverR. Q. (2019). Expressive writing to improve resilience to trauma: a clinical feasibility trial. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 34(1), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.12.005
28.
GoodyJ. (1987). The interface between the written and the oral. Cambridge University Press.
29.
HertzogC.KramerA. F.WilsonR. S.LindenbergerU. (2008). Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults Be Preserved and Enhanced?Psychol Sci Public Interest, 9(1), 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01034.x
30.
HewsonJ. A.KwanC.ShawM.LaiD. W. L. (2018). Developing age-friendly social participation strategies: service providers’ perspectives about organizational and sector readiness for aging baby boomers. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 42(3), 225–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2017.1398034
31.
HoA. H. Y.MaS. H. X.TanM. K. B.BajpaiR. C. (2021). A randomized waitlist-controlled trial of an intergenerational arts and heritage-based intervention in Singapore: Project ARTISAN. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(1), 730709–730717. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730709
32.
JohnsonJ. K.CarpenterT.GoodhartN.StewartA. L.du PlessisL.CoastonA.ClarkK.LazarA.ChaplineJ. (2021). Exploring the effects of visual and literary arts interventions on psychosocial well-being of diverse older adults: a mixed methods pilot study. Arts & Health, 13(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2020.1802603
33.
JohnsonM. L.BungumT. (2008). Aging adults learning new avocations: potential increases in activity among educated baby-boomers. Educational Gerontology, 34(11), 970–996. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270802042156
LeporeS. J.SmythJ. M. (Eds.), (2002). The writing cure: How expressive writing promotes health and emotional well-being. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10451-000
36.
LevasseurM.Lussier-TherrienM.BironM. L.RaymondÉ.CastonguayJ.NaudD.FortierM.SévignyA.HoudeS.TremblayL. (2022). Scoping study of definitions of social participation: Update, co-construction of an interdisciplinary consensual definition, and exploration of the influence of international health policies. Age and Ageing, 51(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab215
37.
LevasseurM.RichardL.GauvinL.RaymondE. (2010). Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: Proposed taxonomy of social activities. Social Science & Medicine, 71(12), 2141–2149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.041
38.
LongdenE.DavisP.CarrollJ.BillingtonJ.KindermanP. (2016). An evaluation of shared reading groups for adults living with dementia: Preliminary findings. Journal of Public Mental Health, 15(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMH-06-2015-0023
39.
MalynB. O.ThomasZ.Ramsey-WadeC. E. (2020). Reading and writing for well-being: A qualitative exploration of the therapeutic experience of older adult participants in a bibliotherapy and creative writing group. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 20(4), 715–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12304
40.
MillsK. J.NicolJ. J.MurphyM. S. (2020). Storying the past, creating the future: Hope and narrative openness in a writing group for older women. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 54(3), 3. https://cjc-rcc.ucalgary.ca/article/view/61249
41.
MurayamaY.OhbaH.YasunagaM.NonakaK.TakeuchiR.NishiM.SakumaN.UchidaH.ShinkaiS.FujiwaraY. (2015). The effect of intergenerational programs on the mental health of elderly adults. Aging & Mental Health, 19(4), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2014.933309
42.
NoraK. (2008). “A new lease on life”: A narrative case study of an older adult, participant design writing group. UMI 3303567) [Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest dissertations & theses, Indiana University of Pennsylvania].
43.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(2), n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
44.
PletzerJ. L.SanchezX.ScheibeS. (2015). Practicing psychotherapists are more skilled at downregulating negative emotions than other professionals.Psychotherapy (Chic), 52(3), 346–350. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039078
45.
PlummerJ.NguyenK.EverlyJ.KiesowA.LeithK.Certificate of Graduate Study in AgingNeils-StrunjasJ. (2023). How an intergenerational book club can prevent cognitive decline in older adults: A pilot study. Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214221150061
46.
PritchardE. K.BrownG. T.BarkerA. L.HainesT. P. (2014). Exploring the association between volition and participation in daily life activities with older adults living in the community.Clin Rehabil, 28(11), 1136–1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215514529803
47.
RichesonN. E.ThorsonJ. A. (2002). The effect of autobiographical writing on the subjective well -being of older adults. North American Journal of Psychology, 4(3), 395–404. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI3004622
48.
RobinsonJ. T.Murphy-NugenA. B. (2018). It makes you keep trying: Life review writing for older adults. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 61(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2018.1427645
49.
RoundJ.BurkeJ. (2018). A dream of a retirement: The longitudinal experiences and perceived retirement wellbeing of recent retirees following a tailored intervention linking best possible self-expressive writing with goal-setting. International Coaching Psychology Review, 13(2), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsicpr.2018.13.2.27
50.
SaundersP. P. (2005). Silent no more—older adults as poets: Creative writing as a preventative approach to cognitive decline of the elderly (UMI 3262830). [Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest dissertations & theses, Union Institute and University].
51.
SchellyD.OhlA.MorontaY.NadresR.SnyderE. (2020). Comparing life review writing with active control groups: Results of a feasibility study.Aust Occup Ther J, 67(6), 528–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12691
52.
SeymourR.MurrayM. (2016). When I am old I shall wear purple: A qualitative study of the effect of group poetry sessions on the well-being of older adults. Working with Older People, 20(4), 195‑198. https://doi.org/10.1108/WWOP-08-2016-0018
53.
SimsT.ReedA. E.CarrD. C. (2017). Information and communication technology use is related to higher well-being among the oldest-old. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(5), 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw130
54.
StickleyT.WatsonM. C.HuiA.BoscoA.FrenchB.HussainB. (2021). “The elder tree”: An evaluation of creative writing groups for older people. Nordic Journal of Arts, Culture and Health, 3(1–2), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2535-7913-2021-01-02-05
55.
SungP.ChiaA.ChanA.MalhotraR. (2023). Reciprocal relationship between lifelong learning and volunteering among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Serie Bibliographique, 78(5), 902–912. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbad003
56.
ToepoelV. (2013). Ageing, leisure, and social connectedness: How could leisure help reduce social isolation of older people?Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0097-6
57.
TriccoA. C.LillieE.ZarinW.O’BrienK. K.ColquhounH.LevacD.MoherD.PetersM. D. J.HorsleyT.WeeksL.HempelS.AklE. A.ChangC.McGowanJ.StewartL.HartlingL.AldcroftA.WilsonM. G.GarrittyC.StrausS. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
58.
WestphalnK. K.RegoecziW.MasotyaM.Vazquez-WestphalnB.LounsburyK.McDavidL.LeeH.JohnsonJ.RonisS. D. (2021). From Arksey and O’Malley and Beyond: Customizations to enhance a team-based, mixed approach to scoping review methodology. MethodsX, 8(1), 101375–101414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101375
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
