This study examined the concordance in spouses’ intention to move after retirement among midlife couples and its association with couples’ marital characteristics (i.e., marital satisfaction and dyadic coping). Using a sample of 1,285 middle-aged couples in Korea (aged 49–64), we conducted logistic/multinomial regression controlling for individual and household characteristics. The majority of couples (83%) were concordant in their moving desires—by either agreeing to move (29%) or to stay (54%), whereas 17% of couples were not in agreement—either only husband (9%) or wife (8%) desires to move. Couples who made daily decisions together and where wives perceived higher marital satisfaction were more likely to have concordant moving desires. Couples where spouses shared each other’s stress and discussed life after retirement were more likely to agree to move than to stay. Our findings suggest the importance of marital dynamics in understanding midlife couples’ residential mobility after retirement.
AnderssonE.AbramssonM.MalmbergB. (2019). Patterns of changing residential preferences during late adulthood. Ageing and Society, 39(8), 1752–1781. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18000259
2.
BergC. A.SchindlerI.SmithT. W.SkinnerM.BeveridgeR. M. (2011). Perceptions of the cognitive compensation and interpersonal enjoyment functions of collaboration among middle-aged and older married couples. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021124
3.
BodenmannG. (1997). Dyadic coping: A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 47(2), 137–141.
4.
BodenmannG.PihetS.KayserK. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping and marital quality: A 2-year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(3), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.20.3.485.
5.
BoernerK.JoppD. S.CarrD.SosinskyL.KimS.-K. (2014). “His” and “her” marriage? The role of positive and negative marital characteristics in global marital satisfaction among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(4), 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu032.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD. M.CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165
8.
ClarkW. A. V. (2013). Life course events and residential change: Unpacking age effects on the probability of moving. Journal of Population Research, 30(4), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-013-9116-y
9.
ClarkW. A. V.LisowskiW. (2017a). Examining the life course sequence of intending to move and moving. Population, Space and Place, 24(3), Article e2100. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2100
10.
ClarkW. A. V.LisowskiW. (2017b). Decisions to move and decisions to stay: Life course events and mobility outcomes. Housing Studies, 32(5), 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2016.1210100
11.
CookeT. J. (2003). Family migration and the relative earnings of husbands and wives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(2), 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.9302005
CookeT. J. (2013). All tied up: Tied staying and tied migration within the United States, 1997 to 2007. Demographic Research, 29(30), 817–836. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.30
14.
CoulterR. (2013). Wishful thinking and the abandonment of moving desires over the life course. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45(8), 1944–1962. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45314
15.
CoulterR.van HamM.FeijtenP. (2011). A longitudinal analysis of moving desires, expectations and actual moving behaviour. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(11), 2742–2760. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44105
16.
CoulterR.van HamM.FeijtenP. (2012). Partner (dis)agreement on moving desires and the subsequent moving behaviour of couples. Population, Space and Place, 18(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.700
17.
CrammJ. M.van DijkH. M.NieboerA. P. (2013). The importance of neighborhood social cohesion and social capital for the well being of older adults in the community. The Gerontologist, 53(1), 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gns052
FalconierM. K.JacksonJ. B.HilpertP.BodenmannG. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002.
20.
FalconierM. K.KuhnR. (2019). Dyadic coping in couples: A conceptual integration and a review of the empirical literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 571. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00571
21.
HaasW. H.III.SerowW. J. (1997). Retirement migration decision making: Life course mobility, sequencing of events, social ties and alternatives. Journal of the Community Development Society, 28(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575339709489798
22.
HanG.ChoeH.EunK.-S.LeeJ.JooS.-H.KimJ. (2011). Korean baby boomers in transition. Seoul National University, Institute on Aging.
23.
HansenE. B.GottschalkG. (2006). What makes older people consider moving house and what makes them move?Housing, Theory and Society, 23(1), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090600587521
24.
HaywardL. M. (2004). Mid-life patterns and the residential mobility of older men. Canadian Journal on Aging, 23(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1353/cja.2004.0007
25.
HenryN. J. M.BergC. A.SmithT. W.FlorsheimP. (2007). Positive and negative characteristics of marital interaction and their association with marital satisfaction in middle-aged and older couples. Psychology and Aging, 22(3), 428–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.428
26.
Hillcoat-NallétambyS.OggJ. (2014). Moving beyond ‘ageing in place’: Older people’s dislikes about their home and neighbourhood environments as a motive for wishing to move. Ageing and Society, 34(10), 1771–1796. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X13000482
27.
KramerC.PfaffenbachC. (2016). Should I stay or should I go? Housing preferences upon retirement in Germany. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-015-9454-5
28.
KuluH.MilewskiN. (2007). Family change and migration in the life course: An introduction. Demographic Research, 17(19), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.19
29.
LangF. R.CarstensenL. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.17.1.125
30.
LavnerJ. A.KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (2016). Does couples’ communication predict marital satisfaction, or does marital satisfaction predict communication?Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(3), 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12301
31.
LeeS. (2021). The families and social relationships of older Koreans. Health and Welfare Policy Forum, 300, 46–57. [in Korean]. https://doi.org/10.23062/2021.10.5
32.
LerschP. M. (2016). Family migration and subsequent employment: The effect of gender ideology. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(1), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12251
33.
LimH.ShinS. H.WilmarthM. J.ParkN. (2022). Who decides? Financial decision-making among older couples. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 43(2), 310–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-021-09775-3
34.
LonginoC. F.PerzynskiA. T.StollerE. P. (2002). Pandora’s briefcase: Unpacking the retirement migration decision. Research on Aging, 24(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027503024001003
35.
MichielinF.MulderC. H. (2008). Family events and the residential mobility of couples. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(11), 2770–2790. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39374
36.
MullinerE.RileyM.MalieneV. (2020). Older people’s preferences for housing and environment characteristics. Sustainability, 12(14), 5723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145723
37.
NortonE. C.DowdB. E.MaciejewskiM. L. (2019). Marginal effects-quantifying the effect of changes in risk factors in logistic regression models. JAMA, 321(13), 1304–1305. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.1954
38.
NowokB.FindlayA.McCollumD. (2018). Linking residential relocation desires and behaviour with life domain satisfaction. Urban Studies, 55(4), 870–890. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016665972
39.
OswaldF.JoppD.RottC.WahlH.-W. (2011). Is aging in place a resource for or risk to life satisfaction?The Gerontologist, 51(2), 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq096
40.
PadulaC. A.McNattM. (2004). Older married couples and health promotion: Joint decision-making process for long-term spouses. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 30(8), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.3928/0098-9134-20040801-08
41.
SchiambergL. B.McKinneyK. G. (2003). Factors influencing expectations to move or age in place at retirement among 40- to 65-year-olds. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 22(1), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464802250043
42.
SchmittM.KliegelM.ShapiroA. (2007). Marital interaction in middle and old age: A predictor of marital satisfaction?International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 65(4), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.65.4.a
43.
SpringA.AckertE.CrowderK.SouthS. J. (2017). Influence of proximity to kin on residential mobility and destination choice: Examining local movers in metropolitan areas. Demography, 54(4), 1277–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0587-x
44.
TennysonS.YangH. K.WoolleyF. (2022). My wife is my insurance policy: Household bargaining and couples’ purchase of long-term care insurance. Research on Aging, 44(9-10), 692–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275211046322
45.
VidalS.HuininkJ. (2019). Introduction to the special collection on spatial mobility, family dynamics, and gender relations. Demographic Research, 41(21), 593–616. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2019.41.21
46.
WeeksL. E.KeefeJ.MacdonaldD. J. (2012). Factors predicting relocation among older adults. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 26(4), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763893.2011.653099
47.
WheelerB.KerpelmanJ. (2016). Change in disagreements about money, time, and sex and marital outcomes. Journal of Relationships Research, 7, Article e6. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2016.8
48.
WilesJ. L.LeibingA.GubermanN.ReeveJ.AllenR. E. S. (2012). The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. The Gerontologist, 52(3), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr098
49.
WoodinE. M. (2011). A two-dimensional approach to relationship conflict: Meta-analytic findings. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(3), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023791.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
