Latin America is aging rapidly. Thus, governments in the region are reformulating their social protection policies. In 2022, Costa Rica passed a national long-term care law. A discussion developed on how to provide such care, whether through public or private in-kind benefits or cash-for-care (CfC) to beneficiaries. CfC has been used in developed countries with various outcomes. However, there are still no evaluations of its effects in middle-income countries. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of CfC pilot study on female caregivers in a middle-income country. The expectations of the program were to find positive effects of CfC on caregivers. After conducting a literature review, we developed four domains of analysis: labor market participation, time for personal activities, use of CfC, and caregiver burnout. The results indicate that CfC has no significant impact on caregivers’ integration into the labor market, or ability to have leisure time. However, there was a positive effect on the funding of basic needs and mitigation of factors predicting burnout.
Abu BakarS. H.WeatherleyR.OmarN.AbdullahF.Mohamad AunN. S. (2014). Projecting social support needs of informal caregivers in Malaysia. Health & Social Care in the Community, 22(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12070
2.
AkkanB. (2018). The politics of care in Turkey: Sacred familialism in a changing political context. Social Politics, 25(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxx011
3.
ArancoN.IbarraránP.StampiniM. (2022). Prevalence of care dependence among older persons in 26 Latin American and the Caribbean countries. Technical Note IDB-TN-2470. IDB. https://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0004250
4.
AttanasioO. P.OppedisanoV.Vera-HernándezM. (2015). Should cash transfers Be conditional? Conditionality, preventive care, and health outcomes. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(2), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20130126
5.
BastagliF.Hagen-ZankerJ.HarmanL.BarcaV.SturgeG.SchmidtT. (2018). The impact of cash transfers: A review of the evidence from low-and middle-income countries. Journal of Social Policy, 48(3), 569–594. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279418000715
6.
BatthyányK. (2015). Policies and care provision in Latin America: A view of regional experiences. Serie asuntos de Género, 124. ECLAC - United Nations.
7.
Chaverri-CarvajalA.Matus-LópezM. (2021). Long-term care in Costa Rica: Lessons for Latin America based on international evidence. Pan American Journal of Public Health, 45, e146. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2021.146.
8.
CooperJ. E.BenmarhniaT.KoskiA.KingN. B. (2020). Cash transfer programs have differential effects on health: A review of the literature from low and middle-income countries. Social Science & Medicine, 247(112806), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112806
9.
CruzR. C. S.MouraL. B. A.Soares NetoJ. J. (2017). Conditional cash transfers and the creation of equal opportunities of health for children in low and middle-income countries: A literature review. International Journal for Equity in Health16(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0647-2
10.
DaboveM. I. (2022). Long-term care services and inter-American human rights in Argentina. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 13(3), 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huab038
11.
Da RoitB.Le BihanB. (2010). Similar and yet so different: Cash-for-care in six European countries' long-term care policies. The Milbank Quarterly, 88(3), 286–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2010.00601.x
12.
Da RoitB.Le BihanB. (2011). Cash-for-Care schemes and the changing role of elderly People´s informal caregivers in France and Italy. In: Pfay-EffingerB.RostgaardT. (eds) Care between work and welfare in European societies. Palgrave Macmillan, pp.177–203. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307612_10
13.
Da RoitB.Le BihanB. (2019). Cash for long-term care: Policy debates, visions, and designs on the move. Social Policy & Administration, 53(4), 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12506
14.
Da RoitB.Moreno-FuentesF. J. (2019). Cash for care and care employment: (Missing) debates and realities. Social Policy & Administration, 53(4), 596–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12503
15.
Da RoitB.van BochoveM. (2017). Migrant care work going Dutch? The emergence of a live-in migrant care market and the restructuring of the Dutch long-term care system. Social Policy & Administration, 51(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12174
16.
De la OA. L. (2015). The universe of cash transfer programs. In: De la OA. L. (Ed.), Crafting policies to end poverty in Latin America: The quiet transformation. Cambridge University Press, pp. 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316105528
17.
DubováR. (2021). Cash for care as special money: The meaning and uses of the care allowance in close relationships in the Czech republic. Feminist Economics, 28(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2021.1988126
18.
GérainP.ZechE. (2021). Do informal caregivers experience more burnout? A meta-analytic study. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1803372
19.
GertlerP. J.MartínezS. W.Rubio-CodinaM. (2012). Investing cash transfers to raise long-term living standards. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(1), 164–192. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.1.164
20.
GibsonM.HeartyW.CraigP. (2020). The public health effects of interventions similar to basic income: A scoping review. The Lancet Public Health, 5(3), e165–e176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30005-0
21.
Gómez-LeónM.EvandrouM.FalkinghamJ.VlachantoniA. (2019). The dynamics of social care and employment in mid-life. Ageing and Society, 39(2), 381–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X17000964
22.
GoriC.LuppiM. (2019). Regulating the delivery of cash‐for‐care payments across Europe. Social Policy & Administration, 53(4), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12500
23.
GoriC.MorcianoM. (2019). Cash-for-care payments in Europe: Changes in resource allocation. Social Policy & Administration, 53(4), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12498
24.
GrootegoedE.KnijnT.Da RoitB. (2010). Relatives as paid care-givers: How family carers experience payments for care. Ageing and Society, 30(3), 467–489. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X09990456
25.
HerreraA. P.LeeJ.PalosG.Torres-VigilI. (2008). Cultural influences in the patterns of long-term care use among Mexican American family caregivers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 27(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464807310682
26.
HunterW.PatelL.SugiyamaN. B. (2021). How family and child cash transfers can empower women: Comparative lessons from Brazil and South Africa. Global Social Policy, 21(2), 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018120981421
27.
KaplanR. L. (2018). Family caregiving and the intergenerational transmission of poverty. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 46(3), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110518804216
28.
KayaalpA.PageK. J.RospendaK. M. (2021). Caregiver burden, work-family conflict, family-work conflict, and mental health of caregivers: A mediational longitudinal study. Work & Stress, 35(3), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2020.1832609
29.
KeigherS. M.Simon-RusinowitzL.LinskN. L.OsterbuschS. E. (1988). Payments to informal versus formal home care providers: Policy divergence affecting the elderly and their families in Michigan and Illinois. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 7(4), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/073346488800700403
30.
KellyG. (2019). Disability, cash transfers and family practices in South Africa. Critical Social Policy, 39(4), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018319867593
31.
KotsadamA. (2011). Does informal eldercare impede women’s employment? The case of European welfare States. Feminist Economics, 17(2), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2010.543384
32.
LambertS. D.BoweS. J.LivingstonP. M.HeckelL.CookS.KowalP.OrellanaL. (2017). Impact of informal caregiving on older adults' physical and mental health in low-income and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional, secondary analysis based on the WHO’s study on global AGEing and adult health (Sage). British Medical Journal Open, 7(11), e017236. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017236
33.
Le BihanB.Da RoitB.SopadzhiyanA. (2019). The turn to optional familialism through the market: Long-term care, cash-for-care, and caregiving policies in Europe. Social Policy & Administration, 53(4): 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12505
34.
Le BihanB.SopadzhiyanA. (2018). The development of an ambiguous care work sector in France. Between professionalization and fragmentation. In ChristensenC.PillingD. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of social care around the world. Routledge, pp. 102–115. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315612805
35.
LeeY.TangF.KimK. H.AlbertS. M. (2015). The vicious cycle of parental caregiving and financial well-being: A longitudinal study of women. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(3), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu001
36.
Lloyd‐SherlockP.GiacominK.CarvalhoP. F.SousaQ. N. F. (2022). Integrated long‐term care partnerships between government social care and health agencies in Brazil: The Belo Horizonte model. International Social Security Review (English Edition), 75(3–4), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12309
37.
Martinez-LacobaR.Pardo-GarciaI.Escribano-SotosF. (2021). Aging, dependence, and long-term care: A systematic review of employment creation. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 58, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580211062426
38.
Martínez-LópezJ. Á.Solano LucasJ. C.Frutos BalibreaL.Bote DíazM. (2023). Women caregivers under the Spanish autonomy and dependence system: A new social underclass?Journal of Family Issues, 44(7), 1949–1968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211067528
39.
Matus-LópezM.Chaverri-CarvajalA. (2022). Progress toward long-term care protection in Latin America: A national long-term care system in Costa Rica. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 23(2), 266–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2021.06.021
40.
Matus-LopezM.Chaverri-CarvajalA.Jara-MalesP. (2022). The challenge of ageing in Latin America: Long-term care in Costa Rica. Saúde E Sociedade, 31(1), e201078. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902021201078
41.
Matus-LopezM.CidC. (2015). Building long-term care policies in Latin America: New programs in Chile. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 16(10), e7–e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.07.018
42.
Matus-LopezM.CidC. (2016). New long-term care policies in Latin America: The national system of care in Uruguay. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 17(7), 663–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.04.001
43.
MDHIS, Ministerio de Desarrollo Humano e Inclusión Social. (2022a). Catálogo de servicios dirigidos a personas con dependencia. Ministerio de Desarrollo Humano e Inclusión Social.
44.
MDHIS, Ministerio de Desarrollo Humano e Inclusión Social. (2022b). Informe de Ejecución 2021 de la Política nacional de Cuidados 2021-2031.Ministerio de Desarrollo Humano e Inclusión Social.
45.
MelloJ. A.MacqJ.Van DurmeT.CèsS.SpruytteN.Van AudenhoveC.DeclercqA. (2017). The determinants of informal caregivers' burden in the care of frail older persons: A dynamic and role-related perspective. Aging & Mental Health, 21(8), 838–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2016.1168360
46.
NaldiniM.PavoliniE.SoleraC. (2016). Female employment and elderly care: The role of care policies and culture in 21 European countries. Work, Employment and Society, 30(4), 607–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017015625602
PalaciosJ.RammA.OliviA. (2021). Constraints that discourage participation in the labour market by female carers of older relatives in Santiago, Chile. Health & Social Care in the Community, 29(5), e107–e115. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13250
49.
PearlinL. I.MullanJ. T.SempleS. J.SkaffM. M. (1990). Caregiving and the stress process: An overview of concepts and their measures. The Gerontologist, 30(5), 583–594. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/30.5.583
50.
Peña-LongobardoL. M.Río-LozanoM. D.Oliva-MorenoJ.Larrañaga-PadillaI.García-CalventeM. D. M. (2021). Health, work, and social problems in Spanish informal caregivers: Does gender matter? (The CUIDAR-SE study). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7332. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147332
51.
San AntonioP. M.EckertJ. K.Simon-RusinowitzL. (2006) The importance of relationship: Elders and their paid family caregivers in the Arkansas cash and counseling qualitative study. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 25(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464805282537
52.
SaracenoC. (2016). Varieties of familialism: Comparing four southern European and East Asian welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(4), 314–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928716657275
53.
Simon-RusinowitzL.MahoneyK.LoughlinD. M.DeBartheS. (2005). Paying family caregivers: An effective policy option in the Arkansas cash and counseling demonstration and evaluation. Marriage & Family Review, 37(1–2), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v37n01_07
54.
VillalobosP. (2017). Envejecimiento y cuidados a largo plazo en Chile: desafíos en el contexto de la OCDE. Pan American Journal of Public Health, 41, e86. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2017.86
55.
VosE.de BruinS.van der BeekA.ProperK. (2021). “It’s like juggling, constantly trying to keep all balls in the air”: A qualitative study of the support needs of working caregivers taking care of older adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11), 5701. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115701
56.
WakabayashiC.DonatoK. M. (2006). Does caregiving increase poverty among women in later life? Evidence from the health and retirement survey. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47(3), 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650604700305
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
