“OK, Boomer” is a phrase used to dismiss an older person for their perceived out-of-touch or offensive beliefs. The popularity of this retort suggests the presence of intergenerational tension; this study explores how the use of “OK, Boomer” relates to the current age stereotype literature. Results indicated that this literature base does not adequately capture how younger adults perceived the titular “Boomer,” and therefore, we used interpretive phenomenological analysis to identify seven unique characteristics ascribed to “Boomers”: closed-minded, argumentative, out-of-touch, offensive, critical, nostalgic, and/or conservative. Future work should monitor how derogatory age-based internet jargon influences ageism and intergenerational relations.
AndrewsH. (2021). Boomers: The men and women who promised freedom and delivered disaster. Sentinel.
2.
BergkvistL.RossiterJ. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 44(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.2\.175
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T. (2002). Doddering but dear: Process, content, and function in stereotyping of older persons. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons (pp. 3–26). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
5.
DriskoJ. W.MaschiT. (2016). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.
6.
ElliottR. (2022). The “Boomer remover”: Intergenerational discounting, the coronavirus and climate change. Sociological Review, 70(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261211049023
7.
FinlayL. (2009). Exploring lived experience: Principles and practice of phenomenological research. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 16(9), 474–481. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2009.16.9.43765
8.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
9.
GardnerD. G.CummingsL. L.DunhamR. B.PierceJ. L. (1998). Single-item versus multiple-item measurement scales: An empirical comparison. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(6), 898–915. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164498058006003
10.
GilesH. (2016). Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal and social identities across contexts. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316226537
11.
GilesH.GasiorekJ.DavisS.GilesJ. (2022). The ingredients of intergenerational communication. In Communication for successful aging: Empowering individuals across the lifespan (pp. 56–71). Routledge.
12.
GlickP.FiskeS. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139022736.005
GreenbergJ.SchimelJ.MartensA. (2002). Ageism: Denying the face of the future. In NelsonT. D. (Ed.), Ageism: Stereotyping and prejudice against older persons (pp. 27–48). Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
15.
HerringH. (2019). Connecting generations: Bridging the boomer, gen x, and millennial divide. Rowman and Littlefield.
16.
HummertM. L. (2019). Intergenerational communication. In Language, communication and intergroup relations: A celebration of the scholarship of howard Giles (pp. 130–161). Routledge.
17.
HummertM. L.GarstkaT. A.ShanerJ. L.StrahmS. (1994). Stereotypes of the elderly held by young, middle-aged, and elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 49(5), 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/49.5
LevyB. R. (2017). Age-stereotype paradox: Opportunity for social change. The Gerontologist, 57(suppl_2), S118–S126. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx059
20.
LilienfeldS. O. (2017). Microaggressions: Strong claims, inadequate evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(1), 138–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616659391
21.
LooR. (2002). A caveat on using single-item versus multiple-item scales. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(1/2), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940210415933
MasonS. E.KuntzC. V.McGillC. M. (2015). Oldsters and ngrams: Age stereotypes across time. Psychological Reports: Sociocultural Issues in Psychology, 116(1), 324–329. https://doi.org/10.2466/17.10.PR0.116k17w6
24.
MellorM. J.RehrH. (2005). Baby boomers: Can my eighties be like my fifties? [electronic resource (1st ed.). Springer.
25.
MichelJ. B.ShenY. K.AidenA. P.VeresA.GrayM. K.PickettJ. P.HoibergD.ClancyD.NorvigP.OrwantJ.PinkerS.NowakM. A.AidenE. L. (2011). The Google books team, and Aiden, E. LQuantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 14(6014), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199644
NgR.AlloreH. G.TrentalangeM.MoninJ. K.LevyB. R. (2015). Increasing negativity of age stereotypes across 200 Years: Evidence from a database of 400 million words. Plos One, 10(2), Article e0117086. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117086
28.
SchmidtD. F.BolandS. M. (1986). The structure of impressions of older adults: Evidence for multiple stereotypes. Psychology and Aging, 1(3), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.1.3.255
29.
SchwarzG.StensakerI. (2014). Time to take off the theoretical straightjacket and (re)introduce phenomenon-driven research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(4), 478–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314549919
30.
SueD. W. (2010). Chapter 1: Microaggressions, marginality, and oppression. In SueD. W. (Ed.), Microaggressions and marginality: Manifestations, dynamic, and impact [electronic resource] (pp. 3–22). John Wiley and Sons.
31.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinG. (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
32.
UrciaI. A. (2021). Comparisons of adaptations in grounded theory and phenomenology: Selecting the specific qualitative research methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 160940692110454. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211045474
33.
ValeM. T.BiscontiT. L.SublettJ. L. (2020). Benevolent ageism: Attitudes of overaccommodative behavior toward older women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 160(5), 548–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2019.1695567
WilliamsM. T. (2020). Microaggressions: Clarification, evidence, and impact. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619827499
