Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-3
Socially Assistive Humanoid Robots: Effects on Depression and Health-Related Quality of Life among Low-Income,Socially Isolated Older Adults in South Korea
Using a mixed-method study design, we examined the effects of a socially assistive humanoid robot (SAHR), called Hyodol, on depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of low-income, socially isolated older adults (N = 180). Quantitative outcomes were assessed at baseline (before Hyodol deployment) and at 3 and 6 months after baseline. Results showed reduced depressive symptoms and improved HRQOL at 3 months; however, these positive effects did not extend to 6 months. Ten focus group participants perceived Hyodol to be a valuable companion especially during the COVID outbreak. These results suggest that while Hyodol may have provided companionship for some low-income, socially isolated older adults during home confinement, its effects on depression and HRQOL were limited. Further research is needed to assess long-term effects of SAHRs as appropriate tools for reducing social isolation and improving behavioral health among community-dwelling older adults.
AbdiJ.Al-HindawiA.NgT.VizcaychipiM. P. (2018). Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open, 8(2), e018815. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018815
2.
BemelmansR.GelderblomG. J.JonkerP.de WitteL. (2016). How to use robot interventions in intramural psychogeriatric care: A feasibility study. Applied Nursing Research, 30(1), 154–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2015.07.003
ChuM. T.KhoslaR.KhaksarS. M.NguyenK. (2017). Service innovation through social robot engagement to improve dementia care quality. Assistive Technology, 29(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2016.1171807
5.
GaleN. K.HeathG.CameronE.RashidS.RedwoodS. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-117
6.
HerdmanM.GudexC.LloydA.JanssenM.KindP.ParkinD.BonselG.BadiaX. (2011). Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life Research, 20(10), 1727–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x
JangK.OhY.LeeE.OhM.KangE.KimE. (2017). 2017 Current status of older Koreans. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
9.
JoH. S.KimJ.KimS. (2019). Factors related to the effectiveness in the use of an ICT-based toy robot for the in-home care of community dwelling elderly. Korean Journal of Health Education Promotion, 36(5), 43–51.
10.
JøransonN.PedersenI.RokstadA. M.AamodtG.OlsenC.IhlebækC. (2016). Group activity with Paro in nursing homes: Systematic investigation of behaviors in participants. International Psychogeriatrics, 28(8), 1345–1354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610216000120
11.
JøransonN.PedersenI.RokstadA. M.IhlebækC. (2015). Effects on symptoms of agitation and depression in persons with dementia participating in robot-assisted activity: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 16(10), 867–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.05.002
12.
KeC.LouV. W.TanK. C.WaiM. Y.ChanL. L. (2020). Changes in technology acceptance among older people with dementia: The role of social robot engagement. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 141, 104241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104241.
13.
KimJ. Y.ParkJ. H.LeeJ. J.HuhY.LeeS. B.HanS. K.ChoiS. W.LeeD. Y.KimK. W.WooJ. I. (2008). Standardization of the Korean version of the geriatric depression scale: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Psychiatry Investigation, 5(4), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2008.5.4.232
14.
KimY.LeeH.KimT.KimJ.OkK. (2020). The effect of care-robots on improving anxiety/depression and drug compliance among the elderly in the community. Korean Society of Biological Therapies in Psychiatry, 26(3), 218–226.
15.
LaneG. W.NoronhaD.RiveraA.CraigK.YeeC.MillsB.VillanuevaE. (2016). Effectiveness of a social robot, “Paro,” in a VA long-term care setting. Psychological Services, 13(3), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000080
16.
LeeB. J.OhY. J. (2008). Factors associated with suicidal ideation among older adults and family types. Family and Environment Research, 16(10), 49–57.
17.
LeeH.ParkR.LeeO. E. (2021). Use of hydol, socially assistive robots for older residents in mid-size cities: ‘My precious companions’. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society, 41(5), 843–864. https://doi.org/10.31888/JKGS.2021.41.5.843
18.
LeeO. E.DavisB. (2020). Adapting ‘sunshine,’ a socially assistive chat robot for older adults with cognitive impairment: A pilot study. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63(6), 696–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2020.1789256
19.
LiangA.PirothI.RobinsonH.MacDonaldB.FisherM.NaterU. M.SkoludaN.BroadbentE. (2017). A pilot randomized trial of a companion robot for people with dementia living in the community. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 18(10), 871–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.05.019
20.
MoyleW.BrambleM.JonesC.MurfieldJ. (2018). Care staff perceptions of a social robot called Paro and a look-alike plush toy: A descriptive qualitative approach. Aging & Mental Health, 22(3), 330–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2016.1262820
ParkinsonS.EatoughV.HolmesJ.StapleyE.MidgleyN. (2016). Framework analysis: A worked example of a study exploring young people’s experiences of depression. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13(2), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1119228
23.
PetersenS.HoustonS.QinH.TagueC.StudleyJ. (2017). The utilization of robotic Pets in dementia care. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 55(2), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160703
24.
RitchieJ.SpencerL. (2002). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In HubermanMMilesMB (Eds.), The qualitative Researcher’s Companion (pp. 305–329). SAGE.
25.
SeibtJ.VestergaardC.DamholdtM. F. (2021). The complexity of human social interactions calls for mixed methods in HRI: Comment on “A primer for conducting experiments in human-robot interaction.” by G. Hoffman and X. Zhao. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 10(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3439715
TakayanagiK.KiritaT.ShibataT. (2014). Comparison of verbal and emotional responses of elderly people with mild/moderate dementia and those with severe dementia in responses to seal robot, PARO. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 257. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00257.
29.
TortaE.WernerF.JohnsonD.O.JuolaJ. F.CuijpersR. H.BazzaniM.OberzaucherJ.LembergerJ.LewyH.BregmanJ. (2014). Evaluation of a small socially-assistive humanoid robot in intelligent homes for the care of the elderly. Journal of Intelligent Robot Systems, 76, 57-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-013-0019.
30.
van HoutB.JanssenM. F.FengY. S.KohlmannT.BusschbachJ.GolickiD.LloydA.ScaloneL.KindP.PickardA. S. (2012). Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value in Health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 15(5), 708–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008
31.
WangR. H.SudhamaA.BegumM.HuqR.MihailidisA. (2017). Robots to assist daily activities: Views of older adults with Alzheimer’s disease and their caregivers. International Psychogeriatrics, 29(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610216001435
32.
WuY. H.Cristancho-LacroixV.FassertC.FaucounauV.de RotrouJ.RigaudA. S. (2016). The attitudes and perceptions of older adults with mild cognitive impairment toward an assistive robot. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 35(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464813515092
33.
YesavageJ. A.BrinkT. L.RoseT. L.LumO.HuangV.AdeyM.LeirerV. O. (1982). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4
34.
YooY. S. (2020). Factors associated with life satisfaction of elderly living alone in South Korea. Korea Entertainment Industry, 14(1), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.2013.44.1.111
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
