We used qualitative methods to better understand wearable activity monitor (WAM) use and its relationship with physical activity (PA) among older adults. Four focus groups, stratified by current/past (“ever”) WAM users and “never” WAM users, were conducted with 57 participants aged ≥60 years. Data were coded with deductive and inductive approaches. Among ever WAM users, those with low pre-WAM PA levels reported higher PA related to WAM use while those with high pre-WAM PA levels reported they used WAM for tracking and monitoring their activity. Ever WAM users were motivated to increase PA through rewards and social support. Many never WAM users reported that WAM was unnecessary. WAM may be helpful for some older adults to increase their PA, particularly those who are motivated by setting and achieving PA goals. The results could help develop strategies to overcome barriers to WAM adoption and promote WAM use among older adults.
AllenL. N.ChristieG. P. (2016). The emergence of personalized health technology. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(5), Article e99. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5357
BlairS. N.WeiM. (2000). Sedentary habits, health, and function in older women and men. American Journal of Health Promotion, 15(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-15.1.1
BrickwoodK. J.WatsonG.O’BrienJ.WilliamsA. D. (2019). Consumer-based wearable activity trackers increase physical activity participation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth, 7(4), Article e11819. https://doi.org/10.2196/11819
7.
CarlsonS. A.FultonJ. E.PrattM.YangZ.AdamsE. K. (2015). Inadequate physical activity and health care expenditures in the United States. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 57(4), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2014.08.002
8.
FloegelT. A.GiacobbiP. R.JrDzierzewskiJ. M.Aiken-MorganA. T.RobertsB.McCraeC. S.MarsiskeM.BumanM. P. (2015). Intervention markers of physical activity maintenance in older adults. American Journal of Health Behavior, 39(4), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.5993/ajhb.39.4.5
9.
GillespieL. D.GillespieW. J.RobertsonM. C.LambS. E.CummingR. G.RoweB. H. (2003). Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, Cd000340. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000340
10.
JudahG.GardnerB.KenwardM. G.DeStavolaB.AungerR. (2018). Exploratory study of the impact of perceived reward on habit formation. BMC Psychology, 6(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-018-0270-z
11.
KononovaA.LiL.KampK.BowenM.RikardR. V.CottenS.PengW. (2019). The use of wearable activity trackers among older adults: Focus group study of tracker perceptions, motivators, and barriers in the maintenance stage of behavior change. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth, 7(4), Article e9832. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9832
12.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Sage.
13.
LaurinD.VerreaultR.LindsayJ.MacPhersonK.RockwoodK. (2001). Physical activity and risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in elderly persons. Archives of Neurology, 58(3), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.58.3.498
14.
LauritzenJ.MuñozA.Luis SevillanoJ.CivitA. (2013). The usefulness of activity trackers in elderly with reduced mobility: A case study. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 192(1), 759–762. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-289-9-759
15.
Le HelloC.TrombertB.MorelA.ChiehA.BrouardB.BoissierC. (2018). Performance analysis of walking of 10,000 regular users of a connected activity tracker. Journal de Médecine Vasculaire, 43(4), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmv.2018.04.001
16.
LyonsE. J.LewisZ. H.MayrsohnB. G.RowlandJ. L. (2014). Behavior change techniques implemented in electronic lifestyle activity monitors: A systematic content analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(8), Article e192. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3469
17.
MercerK.GiangregorioL.SchneiderE.ChilanaP.LiM.GrindrodK. (2016). Acceptance of commercially available wearable activity trackers among adults aged over 50 and with chronic illness: A mixed-methods evaluation. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth, 4(1), Article e7. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4225
18.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
19.
MooreK.O'SheaE.KennyL.BartonJ.TedescoS.SicaM.CroweC.AlamäkiA.CondellJ.NordströmA.TimmonsS. (2021). Older adults’ experiences with using wearable devices: Qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis [review]. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth, 9(6), Article e23832. https://doi.org/10.2196/23832
O'BrienT.Troutman-JordanM.HathawayD.ArmstrongS.MooreM. (2015). Acceptability of wristband activity trackers among community dwelling older adults. Geriatric Nursing, 36(2 Suppl), S21–S25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2015.02.019
23.
OldsT. S.GomersallS. R.OldsS. T.RidleyK. (2019). A source of systematic bias in self-reported physical activity: The cutpoint bias hypothesis. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 22(8), 924–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2019.03.006
24.
OliveiraJ. S.SherringtonC.ER. Y. Z.FrancoM. R.TiedemannA. (2020). Effect of interventions using physical activity trackers on physical activity in people aged 60 years and over: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(20), 1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-100324
25.
OmuraJ. D.CarlsonS. A.PaulP.WatsonK. B.FultonJ. E. (2017). National physical activity surveillance: Users of wearable activity monitors as a potential data source. Preventive Medicine Reports, 5(C), 124–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.10.014
26.
OttoniC. A.Sims-GouldJ.WintersM. (2021). Safety perceptions of older adults on an urban greenway: Interplay of the social and built environment. Health and Place, 70, 102605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102605
PatelM. S.AschD. A.VolppK. G. (2015). Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA, 313(5), 459–460. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.14781
29.
PaulP.CarlsonS. A.CarrollD. D.BerriganD.FultonJ. E. (2015). Walking for transportation and leisure among U.S. Adults—National health interview survey 2010. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 12(Suppl 10 1), S62–S69. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2013-0519
30.
PreusseK. C.MitznerT. L.FaussetC. B.RogersW. A. (2017). Older adults’ acceptance of activity trackers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36(2), 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815624151
31.
SaldanaJ. (2015). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. SAGE.
32.
SaleminkK.StrijkerD.BosworthG. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001
33.
SallisJ. F.OwenN. (1999). Physical activity and behavioral medicine. Sage.
34.
StraitonN.AlharbiM.BaumanA.NeubeckL.GullickJ.BhindiR.GallagherR. (2018). The validity and reliability of consumer-grade activity trackers in older, community-dwelling adults: A systematic review. Maturitas, 112, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.03.016
35.
SullivanA. N.LachmanM. E. (2016). Behavior change with fitness technology in sedentary adults: A review of the evidence for increasing physical activity. Frontiers in Public Health, 4(1), 289. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00289
36.
SwartzM. C.LewisZ. H.SwartzM. D.MartinezE.LyonsE. J. (2019). Brief report: Active ingredients for adherence to a tracker-based physical activity intervention in older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 38(7), 1023–1034. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464817739350
37.
TedescoS.BartonJ.O’FlynnB. (2017). A review of activity trackers for senior citizens: Research perspectives, commercial landscape and the role of the insurance industry. Sensors (Basel), 17(6), 1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17061277
38.
Trudelle-JacksonE.JacksonA. W. (2018). Do older adults who meet 2008 physical activity guidelines have better physical performance than those who do not meet?Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 41(3), 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1519/jpt.0000000000000118
39.
TsaiH. S.ShillairR.CottenS. R.WinsteadV.YostE. (2015). Getting grandma online: Are tablets the answer for increasing digital inclusion for older adults in the U.S. Experimental Gerontology, 41(10), 695–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2015.1048165
40.
WrightS. P.Hall BrownT. S.CollierS. R.SandbergK. (2017). How consumer physical activity monitors could transform human physiology research. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 312(3), R358–R367. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00349.2016
41.
ZytnickD.KumarG. S.FoltaS. C.ReidK. F.TyborD.ChomitzV. R. (2021). Wearable activity monitor use is associated with the aerobic physical activity guidelines and walking among older adults. American Journal of Health Promotion, 35(5), 679–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117120985834
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
