A Comprehensive Digital Self-care Support System for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Development,Feasibility,and Usability Testing of myHESTIA
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2023
A Comprehensive Digital Self-care Support System for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Development,Feasibility,and Usability Testing of myHESTIA
The objective of this mixed methods study is to evaluate the need for a comprehensive digital self-care support system (CDSSS) for older adults with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) and to examine whether such a system can be developed to enable daily capture of self-care data. The 3-phase study involved Phase-1: user needs assessment and prototype development; Phase-2: preliminary user evaluation of the prototype; and Phase-3: 4-week small group usability and feasibility testing of the tracking component of the prototype. Results of Phase-1 show the need for a CDSSS. Phase-2 results demonstrate interest among older adults in using such a CDSSS and Phase-3 findings show that older adults found the tracking component of the system easy to use for capturing daily inputs. Overall, the findings show that it is feasible to design a CDSSS for older adults with MCC in a way that is usable and functional for them.
AnandA.BhattN.AggrawalD.PapicL. (2017). Software reliability modeling with impact of beta testing on release decision. In RamM.DavimJ. P. (Eds.), Advances in reliability and system engineering (pp. 121–138). Springer International Publishing.
2.
BaylissE. A.BondsD. E.BoydC. M.DavisM. M.FinkeB.FoxM. H.GlasgowR. E.GoodmanR. A.Heurtin-RobertsS.LachenmayrS.LindC.MadiganE. A.MeyersD. S.MintzS.NilsenW. J.OkunS.RuizS.SaliveM. E.StangeK. C. (2014). Understanding the context of health for persons with multiple chronic conditions: Moving from what is the matter to what matters. The Annals of Family Medicine, 12(3), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1643
3.
BourbeauJ. (2008). Clinical decision processes and patient engagement in self-management. Disease Management & Health Outcomes, 16(5), 327–333. https://doi.org/10.2165/0115677-200816050-00009
4.
BoydC.SmithC. D.MasoudiF. A.BlaumC. S.DodsonJ. A.GreenA. R.KelleyA.MatlockD.OuelletJ.RichM. W.SchoenbornN. L.TinettiM. E. (2019). Decision making for older adults with multiple chronic conditions: Executive summary for the American geriatrics society guiding principles on the care of older adults with multimorbidity. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 67(4), 665–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15809
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806
6.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
7.
BrhelM.MethH.MaedcheA.WerderK. (2015). Exploring principles of user-centered agile software development: A literature review. Information and Software Technology, 61, 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.01.004
8.
BroderickJ. E.DeWittE. M.RothrockN.CraneP. K.ForrestC. B. (2013). Advances in patient-reported outcomes: The NIH PROMIS® measures. EGEMS, 1(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1015
9.
CaldeiraC.ChenY. (2019). Seniors and self-tracking technology. In SayagoS. (Ed.), Perspectives on human-computer interaction research with older people (pp. 67–79). Springer International Publishing.
10.
De MainA. S.XieB.ShiromaK.YehT.DavisN.HanX. (2022). Assessing the effects of eHealth tutorials on older adults’ eHealth literacy. Journal of Applied Gerontology: The Official Journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 41(7), 1675–1685. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648221088281
11.
GradyP. A.GoughL. L. (2014). Self-management: A comprehensive approach to management of chronic conditions. American Journal of Public Health, 104(8), e25–e31. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2014.302041
12.
HajatC.SteinE. (2018). The global burden of multiple chronic conditions: A narrative review. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12, 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.008
13.
HolmanH.LorigK. (2004). Patient self-management: A key to effectiveness and efficiency in care of chronic disease. Public Health Reports, 119(3), 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phr.2004.04.002
14.
HopmanP.de BruinS. R.ForjazM. J.Rodriguez-BlazquezC.TonnaraG.LemmensL. C.OnderG.BaanC. A.RijkenM. (2016). Effectiveness of comprehensive care programs for patients with multiple chronic conditions or frailty: A systematic literature review. Health Policy, 120(7), 818–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.04.002
15.
HorwitzC. M.MuellerM.WileyD.TentlerA.BockoM.ChenL.LeiboviciA.QuinnJ.SharA.PentlandA. P. (2008). Is home health technology adequate for proactive self-care?Methods of Information in Medicine, 47(01), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.3414/me9101
16.
JaanaM.ParéG. (2020). Use of mobile health technologies for self-tracking purposes among seniors: A comparison to the general adult population in Canada. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii, USA, 7–10 January, 2020.
17.
KakullaB. (2021). 2022 tech trends and adults 50-plus. AARP Research.
18.
LaforestS.NourK.GignacM.GauvinL.ParisienM.PoirierM.-C. (2008). Short-term effects of a self-management intervention on health status of housebound older adults with arthritis. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 27(5), 539–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464808319712
19.
LawlessM. T.TieuM.FeoR.KitsonA. L. (2021). Theories of self-care and self-management of long-term conditions by community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-ethnography. Social Science & Medicine, 287, 114393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114393
20.
MarambaI.ChatterjeeA.NewmanC. (2019). Methods of usability testing in the development of eHealth applications: A scoping review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 126, 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.018
21.
McCorkleR.ErcolanoE.LazenbyM.Schulman-GreenD.SchillingL. S.LorigK.WagnerE. H. (2011). Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 61(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20093
22.
MitznerT. L.BoronJ. B.FaussetC. B.AdamsA. E.CharnessN.CzajaS. J.DijkstraK.FiskA. D.RogersW. A.SharitJ. (2010). Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1710–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020
23.
NambisanP. (2010). Online public health preparedness training programs: An evaluation of user experience with the technological environment. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 2(3), ojphi.v2i3.3012. https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v2i3.3012
24.
NambisanP. (2011). Evaluating patient experience in online health communities: Implications for health care organizations. Health Care Management Review, 36(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1097/hmr.0b013e3182099f82
25.
NambisanP. (2019). Comprehensive digital self-care support system (CDSSS). In GuD.DupreM. E. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of gerontology and population aging (pp. 1–10). Springer International Publishing.
26.
NambisanP.WattJ. H. (2011). Managing customer experiences in online product communities. Journal of Business Research, 64(8), 889–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.006
27.
ParkC.SongM.ChoB.LimJ.SongW.ChangH.ParkY.-H. (2015). Effects of a multi-disciplinary approached, empowerment theory based self-management intervention in older adults with chronic illness. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 45(2), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2015.45.2.192
28.
RyanP.SawinK. J. (2009). The individual and family self-management theory: Background and perspectives on context, process, and outcomes. Nursing Outlook, 57(4), 217–225.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.004
SeifertA. (2020). The digital exclusion of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63(6–7), 674–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2020.1764687
31.
SeifertA.CottenS. R.XieB. (2021). A double burden of exclusion? Digital and social exclusion of older adults in times of COVID-19. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(3), e99–e103. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa098
32.
van VelsenL.BeaujeanD. J.van Gemert-PijnenJ. E. (2013). Why mobile health app overload drives us crazy, and how to restore the sanity. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-23
33.
VaportzisE.Giatsi ClausenM.GowA. J. (2017). Older adults perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: A focus group study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01687
34.
WardB. W.SchillerJ. S. (2013). Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among US adults: Estimates from the national health interview survey, 2010. Preventing Chronic Disease, 10, 120203. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd10.120203
YuD. S.LiP. W.LiS. X.SmithR. D.YueS. C.-S.YanB. P. Y. (2022). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an empowerment-based self-care education program on health outcomes among patients with heart failure: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 5(4), e225982–e225982. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5982
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
