Abstract
Several prediction models for frailty in older adults have been published, but their characteristics and methodological quality are unclear. This review aims to summarize and critically appraise the prediction models. Studies describing multivariable prediction models for frailty among older adults were included. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO were searched from outset to Feb 21, 2021. Methodological and reporting quality of included models were evaluated by PROBAST and TRIPOD, respectively. All results were descriptively summarized. Twenty articles including 39 models were identified. The included models showed good predictive discrimination with C indices ranging from 0.70 to 0.98. However, all studies except one were assessed as high risk of bias mainly due to inappropriate analysis; meanwhile, poor reporting quality was also frequently observed. Few mature prediction models can be used in practice. Researchers should pay more attention to external validation and improving the quality both in methodology and reporting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
